异种胶原蛋白基质在植入前软组织增量中的功效:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Shashi Dadlani, Betsy Joseph, Sukumaran Anil
{"title":"异种胶原蛋白基质在植入前软组织增量中的功效:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Shashi Dadlani,&nbsp;Betsy Joseph,&nbsp;Sukumaran Anil","doi":"10.1002/cre2.937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Xenogenic collagen matrices (XCMs) are gaining popularity for soft tissue augmentation in dental implants; yet, gaps exist in our understanding of their comparative effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on studies that utilize soft tissue augmentation techniques for dental implants to improve keratinized mucosa width (KMW), soft tissue thickness (STT), and soft tissue volume (STV). We compared porcine collagen matrices with autogenous grafts when no bone grafts were utilized.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials published between January 2013 and July 2023 that assessed the efficacy of XCM in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation. The primary outcome included KMW changes while the secondary outcome was STT/STV changes. Statistical analyses were conducted using a random- or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and six were included in the meta-analysis. No significant intergroup differences were observed (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), but a significant difference was observed in favor of KMW ≥ 2 mm. Heterogeneity among the studies varied at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, with <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> values of 78% and 0%, respectively. The pooled mean difference between the XCM and autograft groups was −0.96 (−1.71 to −0.21), which shows that there was a larger increase in KMW in the autograft group compared with the XCM group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Collagen matrices are less effective than autogenous grafts at increasing keratinized tissue and STT/STV, but the two techniques yield comparable aesthetic outcomes. Additional studies are necessary to better guide clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrices in Augmenting Peri-Implant Soft Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shashi Dadlani,&nbsp;Betsy Joseph,&nbsp;Sukumaran Anil\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Xenogenic collagen matrices (XCMs) are gaining popularity for soft tissue augmentation in dental implants; yet, gaps exist in our understanding of their comparative effectiveness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on studies that utilize soft tissue augmentation techniques for dental implants to improve keratinized mucosa width (KMW), soft tissue thickness (STT), and soft tissue volume (STV). We compared porcine collagen matrices with autogenous grafts when no bone grafts were utilized.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials published between January 2013 and July 2023 that assessed the efficacy of XCM in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation. The primary outcome included KMW changes while the secondary outcome was STT/STV changes. Statistical analyses were conducted using a random- or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and six were included in the meta-analysis. No significant intergroup differences were observed (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05), but a significant difference was observed in favor of KMW ≥ 2 mm. Heterogeneity among the studies varied at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, with <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> values of 78% and 0%, respectively. The pooled mean difference between the XCM and autograft groups was −0.96 (−1.71 to −0.21), which shows that there was a larger increase in KMW in the autograft group compared with the XCM group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Collagen matrices are less effective than autogenous grafts at increasing keratinized tissue and STT/STV, but the two techniques yield comparable aesthetic outcomes. Additional studies are necessary to better guide clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300508/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:异种胶原基质 (XCM) 在牙科植入物的软组织增量方面越来越受欢迎;然而,我们对其比较效果的认识还存在差距:本系统综述和荟萃分析主要关注利用软组织增量技术改善角化粘膜宽度(KMW)、软组织厚度(STT)和软组织体积(STV)的研究。我们比较了猪胶原蛋白基质和自体移植物(在不使用骨移植物的情况下):我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 等数据库中搜索了 2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月间发表的随机对照试验和对照临床试验,这些试验评估了 XCM 在种植体周围软组织增量中的疗效。主要结果包括 KMW 变化,次要结果为 STT/STV 变化。使用随机或固定效应模型进行统计分析,并使用 I2 统计量评估异质性:定性分析纳入了九项研究,荟萃分析纳入了六项研究。没有观察到明显的组间差异(P > 0.05),但观察到 KMW ≥ 2 mm 的研究有明显差异。在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访中,研究间的异质性各不相同,I2 值分别为 78% 和 0%。XCM 组和自体移植组之间的汇总平均差异为-0.96(-1.71 至-0.21),这表明自体移植组的 KMW 比 XCM 组有更大的增加(P 结论:自体移植组的 KMW 比 XCM 组的 KMW 有更大的增加,而 XCM 组的 KMW 比自体移植组的 KMW 有更大的增加:在增加角化组织和 STT/STV 方面,胶原基质不如自体移植物有效,但两种技术产生的美学效果相当。有必要进行更多的研究,以更好地指导临床实践,改善患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrices in Augmenting Peri-Implant Soft Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrices in Augmenting Peri-Implant Soft Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Xenogenic collagen matrices (XCMs) are gaining popularity for soft tissue augmentation in dental implants; yet, gaps exist in our understanding of their comparative effectiveness.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on studies that utilize soft tissue augmentation techniques for dental implants to improve keratinized mucosa width (KMW), soft tissue thickness (STT), and soft tissue volume (STV). We compared porcine collagen matrices with autogenous grafts when no bone grafts were utilized.

Materials and Methods

We searched databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials published between January 2013 and July 2023 that assessed the efficacy of XCM in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation. The primary outcome included KMW changes while the secondary outcome was STT/STV changes. Statistical analyses were conducted using a random- or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.

Results

Nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and six were included in the meta-analysis. No significant intergroup differences were observed (p > 0.05), but a significant difference was observed in favor of KMW ≥ 2 mm. Heterogeneity among the studies varied at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, with I2 values of 78% and 0%, respectively. The pooled mean difference between the XCM and autograft groups was −0.96 (−1.71 to −0.21), which shows that there was a larger increase in KMW in the autograft group compared with the XCM group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Collagen matrices are less effective than autogenous grafts at increasing keratinized tissue and STT/STV, but the two techniques yield comparable aesthetic outcomes. Additional studies are necessary to better guide clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信