Yingchen He, Jonathon Toft-Nielsen, Gordon Legge, Sandra R Montezuma
{"title":"假肢视觉和模拟视觉缩减中的模式反转视觉诱发电位。","authors":"Yingchen He, Jonathon Toft-Nielsen, Gordon Legge, Sandra R Montezuma","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantitatively evaluate visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in prosthetic vision and simulated visual reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Four blind patients implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis and seven sighted controls participated. VEPs were recorded with pattern-reversal stimuli (2 cycles of a horizontal square wave grating, 0.1 cycle/degree) at 1.07 reversals per second (rps) for Argus II subjects and 3.37 rps for controls. Argus II patients had both eyes patched, viewing the pattern solely through their implant. Controls viewed the pattern monocularly, either with their best-corrected vision or with simulated visual reduction (field restriction, added blur or reduced display contrast).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VEPs recorded in Argus II patients displayed a similar shape to normal VEPs when controls viewed the pattern without simulated visual reduction. In sighted controls, adding blur significantly delayed the P100 peak time by 8.7 ms, 95% CI (0.9, 16.6). Reducing stimulus contrast to 32% and 6% of full display contrast significantly decreased P100 amplitude to 55% (37%, 82%) and 20% (13%, 31%), respectively. Restriction on the field of view had no impact on either the amplitude or the peak latency of P100.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The early visual cortex in retinal prosthesis users remains responsive to retinal input, showing a similar response profile to that of sighted controls. Pattern-reversal VEP offers valuable insights for objectively evaluating artificial vision therapy systems (AVTSs) when selecting, fitting and training implant users, but the uncertainties in the exact timing and location of electrode stimulation must be considered when interpreting the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials in prosthetic vision and simulated visual reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Yingchen He, Jonathon Toft-Nielsen, Gordon Legge, Sandra R Montezuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantitatively evaluate visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in prosthetic vision and simulated visual reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Four blind patients implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis and seven sighted controls participated. VEPs were recorded with pattern-reversal stimuli (2 cycles of a horizontal square wave grating, 0.1 cycle/degree) at 1.07 reversals per second (rps) for Argus II subjects and 3.37 rps for controls. Argus II patients had both eyes patched, viewing the pattern solely through their implant. Controls viewed the pattern monocularly, either with their best-corrected vision or with simulated visual reduction (field restriction, added blur or reduced display contrast).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VEPs recorded in Argus II patients displayed a similar shape to normal VEPs when controls viewed the pattern without simulated visual reduction. In sighted controls, adding blur significantly delayed the P100 peak time by 8.7 ms, 95% CI (0.9, 16.6). Reducing stimulus contrast to 32% and 6% of full display contrast significantly decreased P100 amplitude to 55% (37%, 82%) and 20% (13%, 31%), respectively. Restriction on the field of view had no impact on either the amplitude or the peak latency of P100.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The early visual cortex in retinal prosthesis users remains responsive to retinal input, showing a similar response profile to that of sighted controls. Pattern-reversal VEP offers valuable insights for objectively evaluating artificial vision therapy systems (AVTSs) when selecting, fitting and training implant users, but the uncertainties in the exact timing and location of electrode stimulation must be considered when interpreting the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308878/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:定量评估义眼和模拟视力下降时的视觉诱发电位(VEP):定量评估义眼和模拟视力下降时的视觉诱发电位(VEP):四名植入 Argus II 视网膜假体的盲人患者和七名视力正常的对照组患者参加了此次研究。在模式反转刺激(水平方波光栅的 2 个周期,每度 0.1 个周期)下记录 VEP,Argus II 患者的反转频率为每秒 1.07 次,对照组为每秒 3.37 次。Argus II 患者双眼都被植入植入体,只能通过植入体观看图案。对照组则单眼观看图案,要么使用最佳矫正视力,要么使用模拟视觉减弱(视野限制、增加模糊度或降低显示对比度):结果:Argus II 患者记录的 VEPs 在对照组观看图案时显示出与正常 VEPs 相似的形状,但没有模拟视力下降。在视力正常的对照组中,增加模糊会使 P100 峰值时间明显延迟 8.7 毫秒,95% CI (0.9, 16.6)。将刺激对比度降低到全显示对比度的 32% 和 6% 会显著降低 P100 波幅,分别为 55% (37%, 82%) 和 20% (13%, 31%)。视场的限制对 P100 的振幅或峰值潜伏期均无影响:结论:视网膜假体使用者的早期视觉皮层对视网膜输入仍有反应,显示出与健视对照组相似的反应特征。模式反转 VEP 为客观评估人工视觉治疗系统(AVTS)提供了宝贵的见解,有助于选择、安装和训练植入用户,但在解释结果时必须考虑电极刺激的确切时间和位置的不确定性。
Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials in prosthetic vision and simulated visual reduction.
Objective: To quantitatively evaluate visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in prosthetic vision and simulated visual reduction.
Methods and analysis: Four blind patients implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis and seven sighted controls participated. VEPs were recorded with pattern-reversal stimuli (2 cycles of a horizontal square wave grating, 0.1 cycle/degree) at 1.07 reversals per second (rps) for Argus II subjects and 3.37 rps for controls. Argus II patients had both eyes patched, viewing the pattern solely through their implant. Controls viewed the pattern monocularly, either with their best-corrected vision or with simulated visual reduction (field restriction, added blur or reduced display contrast).
Results: VEPs recorded in Argus II patients displayed a similar shape to normal VEPs when controls viewed the pattern without simulated visual reduction. In sighted controls, adding blur significantly delayed the P100 peak time by 8.7 ms, 95% CI (0.9, 16.6). Reducing stimulus contrast to 32% and 6% of full display contrast significantly decreased P100 amplitude to 55% (37%, 82%) and 20% (13%, 31%), respectively. Restriction on the field of view had no impact on either the amplitude or the peak latency of P100.
Conclusion: The early visual cortex in retinal prosthesis users remains responsive to retinal input, showing a similar response profile to that of sighted controls. Pattern-reversal VEP offers valuable insights for objectively evaluating artificial vision therapy systems (AVTSs) when selecting, fitting and training implant users, but the uncertainties in the exact timing and location of electrode stimulation must be considered when interpreting the results.