Hui Cao , Pingxing Li , Weixuan Song , Jianglong Chen , Cheng Chen
{"title":"供给是否与需求相匹配?从公平和效率的角度评估城市公园与居民之间的关系","authors":"Hui Cao , Pingxing Li , Weixuan Song , Jianglong Chen , Cheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The supply-demand relationship between urban parks and residents is a hot topic for promoting sustainable and efficient cities. Most studies have focused on the assessment of spatial equity, while ignoring the evaluation of park use efficiency. Taking Nanjing as an example, we developed specific indicators, namely, the supply intensity of urban park (<em>UPSI</em>), per capita park area (<em>PCPA</em>), usage ratio (<em>UR</em>), and demand satisfaction ratio (<em>DSR</em>), to measure equity and efficiency on the basis mobile phone signalling data. The results show that the service areas of urban parks cover only approximately 4/5 of the urban residences, and that the <em>PCPA</em>s of urban residences were divergent. In addition, most urban parks had unsuitable <em>UR</em>s, and the <em>DSR</em>s indicated that most residents’ demand could not be satisfied by the surrounding parks. A spatial lag model (SLM) was introduced to explore the factors influencing residents’ demand. In combination with the literature, we concluded that the disparity between urban park supply and resident demand resulted from the spatial distribution of physical geographic factors, changes in urban planning and development strategies, and the diverse and dynamic demands of urban residents. On the basis of the above results, we further made recommendations for the management and planning of urban parks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 128469"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does supply match demand? Assessing the relationship between urban parks and residents from the perspective of equity and efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Hui Cao , Pingxing Li , Weixuan Song , Jianglong Chen , Cheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The supply-demand relationship between urban parks and residents is a hot topic for promoting sustainable and efficient cities. Most studies have focused on the assessment of spatial equity, while ignoring the evaluation of park use efficiency. Taking Nanjing as an example, we developed specific indicators, namely, the supply intensity of urban park (<em>UPSI</em>), per capita park area (<em>PCPA</em>), usage ratio (<em>UR</em>), and demand satisfaction ratio (<em>DSR</em>), to measure equity and efficiency on the basis mobile phone signalling data. The results show that the service areas of urban parks cover only approximately 4/5 of the urban residences, and that the <em>PCPA</em>s of urban residences were divergent. In addition, most urban parks had unsuitable <em>UR</em>s, and the <em>DSR</em>s indicated that most residents’ demand could not be satisfied by the surrounding parks. A spatial lag model (SLM) was introduced to explore the factors influencing residents’ demand. In combination with the literature, we concluded that the disparity between urban park supply and resident demand resulted from the spatial distribution of physical geographic factors, changes in urban planning and development strategies, and the diverse and dynamic demands of urban residents. On the basis of the above results, we further made recommendations for the management and planning of urban parks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672400267X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672400267X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
城市公园与居民之间的供需关系是促进城市可持续高效发展的热门话题。大多数研究侧重于对空间公平性的评价,而忽视了对公园使用效率的评价。以南京为例,我们以手机信号数据为基础,开发了城市公园供给强度()、人均公园面积()、使用率()、需求满足率()等具体指标来衡量公平与效率。结果表明,城市公园的服务范围仅覆盖约 4/5 的城市居民,且城市居民的满意度参差不齐。此外,大多数城市公园的 s 不合适,s 表明大多数居民的需求无法通过周围的公园得到满足。我们引入了空间滞后模型(SLM)来探讨居民需求的影响因素。结合文献研究,我们认为城市公园供给与居民需求之间的差距主要源于自然地理因素的空间分布、城市规划和发展战略的变化以及城市居民多样化的动态需求。在上述结果的基础上,我们进一步对城市公园的管理和规划提出了建议。
Does supply match demand? Assessing the relationship between urban parks and residents from the perspective of equity and efficiency
The supply-demand relationship between urban parks and residents is a hot topic for promoting sustainable and efficient cities. Most studies have focused on the assessment of spatial equity, while ignoring the evaluation of park use efficiency. Taking Nanjing as an example, we developed specific indicators, namely, the supply intensity of urban park (UPSI), per capita park area (PCPA), usage ratio (UR), and demand satisfaction ratio (DSR), to measure equity and efficiency on the basis mobile phone signalling data. The results show that the service areas of urban parks cover only approximately 4/5 of the urban residences, and that the PCPAs of urban residences were divergent. In addition, most urban parks had unsuitable URs, and the DSRs indicated that most residents’ demand could not be satisfied by the surrounding parks. A spatial lag model (SLM) was introduced to explore the factors influencing residents’ demand. In combination with the literature, we concluded that the disparity between urban park supply and resident demand resulted from the spatial distribution of physical geographic factors, changes in urban planning and development strategies, and the diverse and dynamic demands of urban residents. On the basis of the above results, we further made recommendations for the management and planning of urban parks.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.