面对气候变化:中高纬度地区种植系统风险与机遇的传播:中美玉米带案例研究

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jiazhong Zheng , Weihan Wang , Weiguang Wang , Tong Cui , Shuai Chen , Cundong Xu , Bernard Engel
{"title":"面对气候变化:中高纬度地区种植系统风险与机遇的传播:中美玉米带案例研究","authors":"Jiazhong Zheng ,&nbsp;Weihan Wang ,&nbsp;Weiguang Wang ,&nbsp;Tong Cui ,&nbsp;Shuai Chen ,&nbsp;Cundong Xu ,&nbsp;Bernard Engel","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anthropogenic activities are leading to increased concentrations of greenhouse gases, especially CO<sub>2</sub>, in the atmosphere. This is threatening the resilience of cropping systems, although many crops show strong adaptation abilities. How interactions between climate change and increases in the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration ([CO<sub>2</sub>]) will ultimately affect regional crop production, including growth processes and water utilization, is not well understood. Climate variability has different effects on agriculture depending on the type of water resources (i.e., rain-fed vs. irrigated crops). To date, however, there have been no reports on disparities in the responses of crop productivity and water consumption to climate change between irrigated and rain-fed agricultural production at identical latitudes. We aimed to compare the responses of maize crops, in terms of productivity and water consumption, between two mid-high latitude regions under various climate change scenarios, with and without considering the effects of elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>]. The Southwestern Plain of the Great Lakes (SPG) located in the U.S. Corn Belt and the Northeast Plain (NEPC) located in the China Corn Belt were selected as irrigated and rain-fed case study areas, respectively. Using the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator with three global climate models under two representative concentration path emission scenarios in combination with six CO<sub>2</sub> trajectories, the risks and opportunities of global warming for maize crops, in terms of growth and water consumption, were characterized at a regional scale from the viewpoint of the water footprint concept. The influence of climate warming on maize crops will be stronger in the SPG than in the NEPC in terms of the future average length of the whole growing season duration (GSD-w), yield, and water consumption. The sowing date and maize variety were kept constant in these simulations. The model predicted that the protective effect of elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>] on maize GSD-w will not be as significant as that on yield. Our results indicate that elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>] could reduce the water intensity per unit yield of maize by 159.2 m<sup>3</sup>/t, on average, in the two study regions. The results of this study provide insights into the risks and opportunities of climate change for irrigated and rain-fed maize cropping systems in mid-high-latitude regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104087"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FACE-ing climate change: Propagation of risks and opportunities for cropping systems in mid-high-latitude regions: A case study between U.S. and China corn belts\",\"authors\":\"Jiazhong Zheng ,&nbsp;Weihan Wang ,&nbsp;Weiguang Wang ,&nbsp;Tong Cui ,&nbsp;Shuai Chen ,&nbsp;Cundong Xu ,&nbsp;Bernard Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Anthropogenic activities are leading to increased concentrations of greenhouse gases, especially CO<sub>2</sub>, in the atmosphere. This is threatening the resilience of cropping systems, although many crops show strong adaptation abilities. How interactions between climate change and increases in the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration ([CO<sub>2</sub>]) will ultimately affect regional crop production, including growth processes and water utilization, is not well understood. Climate variability has different effects on agriculture depending on the type of water resources (i.e., rain-fed vs. irrigated crops). To date, however, there have been no reports on disparities in the responses of crop productivity and water consumption to climate change between irrigated and rain-fed agricultural production at identical latitudes. We aimed to compare the responses of maize crops, in terms of productivity and water consumption, between two mid-high latitude regions under various climate change scenarios, with and without considering the effects of elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>]. The Southwestern Plain of the Great Lakes (SPG) located in the U.S. Corn Belt and the Northeast Plain (NEPC) located in the China Corn Belt were selected as irrigated and rain-fed case study areas, respectively. Using the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator with three global climate models under two representative concentration path emission scenarios in combination with six CO<sub>2</sub> trajectories, the risks and opportunities of global warming for maize crops, in terms of growth and water consumption, were characterized at a regional scale from the viewpoint of the water footprint concept. The influence of climate warming on maize crops will be stronger in the SPG than in the NEPC in terms of the future average length of the whole growing season duration (GSD-w), yield, and water consumption. The sowing date and maize variety were kept constant in these simulations. The model predicted that the protective effect of elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>] on maize GSD-w will not be as significant as that on yield. Our results indicate that elevated [CO<sub>2</sub>] could reduce the water intensity per unit yield of maize by 159.2 m<sup>3</sup>/t, on average, in the two study regions. The results of this study provide insights into the risks and opportunities of climate change for irrigated and rain-fed maize cropping systems in mid-high-latitude regions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002373\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类活动导致大气中温室气体(尤其是二氧化碳)浓度增加。尽管许多作物表现出很强的适应能力,但这正威胁着作物种植系统的恢复能力。气候变化与大气中二氧化碳浓度([CO])增加之间的相互作用将如何最终影响地区作物生产,包括生长过程和水分利用,目前还不十分清楚。气候多变性对农业的影响因水资源类型(即雨水灌溉作物与灌溉作物)而异。然而,迄今为止,还没有关于相同纬度地区灌溉农业生产与雨水灌溉农业生产在作物生产率和耗水量方面对气候变化的反应差异的报道。我们的目的是比较两个中高纬度地区在各种气候变化情景下玉米作物在生产率和耗水量方面的反应,包括考虑和不考虑[CO]升高的影响。研究分别选取了位于美国玉米带的五大湖西南平原(SPG)和位于中国玉米带的东北平原(NEPC)作为灌溉和雨水灌溉案例研究区。利用农业生产系统模拟器(Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator)和三种全球气候模型,在两种代表性浓度路径排放情景下,结合六种二氧化碳轨迹,从水足迹概念的角度,在区域尺度上描述了全球变暖对玉米作物生长和耗水的风险和机遇。从未来整个生长期的平均长度(GSD-w)、产量和耗水量来看,气候变暖对玉米作物的影响在南太平洋区域将比在北太平洋区域更大。在这些模拟中,播种日期和玉米品种保持不变。模型预测,[CO]升高对玉米 GSD-w 的保护作用不如对产量的保护作用显著。我们的结果表明,在两个研究区域,[CO]升高可使玉米单位产量的水分强度平均降低 159.2 m/t。这项研究的结果为中高纬度地区灌溉和雨水灌溉玉米种植系统提供了气候变化的风险和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

FACE-ing climate change: Propagation of risks and opportunities for cropping systems in mid-high-latitude regions: A case study between U.S. and China corn belts

FACE-ing climate change: Propagation of risks and opportunities for cropping systems in mid-high-latitude regions: A case study between U.S. and China corn belts

Anthropogenic activities are leading to increased concentrations of greenhouse gases, especially CO2, in the atmosphere. This is threatening the resilience of cropping systems, although many crops show strong adaptation abilities. How interactions between climate change and increases in the atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) will ultimately affect regional crop production, including growth processes and water utilization, is not well understood. Climate variability has different effects on agriculture depending on the type of water resources (i.e., rain-fed vs. irrigated crops). To date, however, there have been no reports on disparities in the responses of crop productivity and water consumption to climate change between irrigated and rain-fed agricultural production at identical latitudes. We aimed to compare the responses of maize crops, in terms of productivity and water consumption, between two mid-high latitude regions under various climate change scenarios, with and without considering the effects of elevated [CO2]. The Southwestern Plain of the Great Lakes (SPG) located in the U.S. Corn Belt and the Northeast Plain (NEPC) located in the China Corn Belt were selected as irrigated and rain-fed case study areas, respectively. Using the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator with three global climate models under two representative concentration path emission scenarios in combination with six CO2 trajectories, the risks and opportunities of global warming for maize crops, in terms of growth and water consumption, were characterized at a regional scale from the viewpoint of the water footprint concept. The influence of climate warming on maize crops will be stronger in the SPG than in the NEPC in terms of the future average length of the whole growing season duration (GSD-w), yield, and water consumption. The sowing date and maize variety were kept constant in these simulations. The model predicted that the protective effect of elevated [CO2] on maize GSD-w will not be as significant as that on yield. Our results indicate that elevated [CO2] could reduce the water intensity per unit yield of maize by 159.2 m3/t, on average, in the two study regions. The results of this study provide insights into the risks and opportunities of climate change for irrigated and rain-fed maize cropping systems in mid-high-latitude regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信