{"title":"各大洲的草地生物量分配、放牧方式及其对气候和海拔的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biomass allocation in grasslands is key to understanding plant response to environmental changes and grazing management. Yet, global studies on how this split between above-ground and below-ground biomass varies across continents and grazing practices are notably scarce. We employ a comprehensive field-oriented grassland database to examine differences in total net primary productivity (TNPP), above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP), below-ground net primary productivity (BNPP), and the BNPP to ANPP ratio across continents and between grazed and non-grazed grasslands. Oceania showed the greatest ANPP (916 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), while Asia had the lowest (192 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). BNPP values were similar among Oceania, Africa, and Asia (∼600 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), significantly exceeding those in Europe (289 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>) and North America (408 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). South America, Africa, and Oceania had the highest TNPP (around 1418 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> to 1466 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), while Europe had the lowest TNPP (344 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). The BNPP to ANPP ratio was highest in South America (4.17) and Asia (3.46). Global differences in TNPP and BNPP between grazed and non-grazed grasslands were minimal, but ANPP (169 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> and 198 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) and the BNPP to ANPP ratio (4.87 and 2.40, respectively) differed significantly. Across continents and grazing practices, climate had a greater role in regulating grassland biomass allocation than altitude, and warming may have a more detrimental impact on grazed grasslands than non-grazed grasslands. Distinct biomass allocation trends under various continental and grazing conditions exert effects on the economic and ecological functions of grasslands. Our study underscores the need for balanced grassland utilization strategies at a global scale. This involves optimizing grazing in high ANPP grasslands and protecting those with significant BNPP, thereby contributing to a sustainable and ecologically sound use of grasslands in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grassland biomass allocation across continents and grazing practices and its response to climate and altitude\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Biomass allocation in grasslands is key to understanding plant response to environmental changes and grazing management. Yet, global studies on how this split between above-ground and below-ground biomass varies across continents and grazing practices are notably scarce. We employ a comprehensive field-oriented grassland database to examine differences in total net primary productivity (TNPP), above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP), below-ground net primary productivity (BNPP), and the BNPP to ANPP ratio across continents and between grazed and non-grazed grasslands. Oceania showed the greatest ANPP (916 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), while Asia had the lowest (192 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). BNPP values were similar among Oceania, Africa, and Asia (∼600 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), significantly exceeding those in Europe (289 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>) and North America (408 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). South America, Africa, and Oceania had the highest TNPP (around 1418 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> to 1466 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>), while Europe had the lowest TNPP (344 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>). The BNPP to ANPP ratio was highest in South America (4.17) and Asia (3.46). Global differences in TNPP and BNPP between grazed and non-grazed grasslands were minimal, but ANPP (169 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup> and 198 g·m<sup>−2</sup>·a<sup>−1</sup>, respectively) and the BNPP to ANPP ratio (4.87 and 2.40, respectively) differed significantly. Across continents and grazing practices, climate had a greater role in regulating grassland biomass allocation than altitude, and warming may have a more detrimental impact on grazed grasslands than non-grazed grasslands. Distinct biomass allocation trends under various continental and grazing conditions exert effects on the economic and ecological functions of grasslands. Our study underscores the need for balanced grassland utilization strategies at a global scale. This involves optimizing grazing in high ANPP grasslands and protecting those with significant BNPP, thereby contributing to a sustainable and ecologically sound use of grasslands in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324002892\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324002892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Grassland biomass allocation across continents and grazing practices and its response to climate and altitude
Biomass allocation in grasslands is key to understanding plant response to environmental changes and grazing management. Yet, global studies on how this split between above-ground and below-ground biomass varies across continents and grazing practices are notably scarce. We employ a comprehensive field-oriented grassland database to examine differences in total net primary productivity (TNPP), above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP), below-ground net primary productivity (BNPP), and the BNPP to ANPP ratio across continents and between grazed and non-grazed grasslands. Oceania showed the greatest ANPP (916 g·m−2·a−1), while Asia had the lowest (192 g·m−2·a−1). BNPP values were similar among Oceania, Africa, and Asia (∼600 g·m−2·a−1), significantly exceeding those in Europe (289 g·m−2·a−1) and North America (408 g·m−2·a−1). South America, Africa, and Oceania had the highest TNPP (around 1418 g·m−2·a−1 to 1466 g·m−2·a−1), while Europe had the lowest TNPP (344 g·m−2·a−1). The BNPP to ANPP ratio was highest in South America (4.17) and Asia (3.46). Global differences in TNPP and BNPP between grazed and non-grazed grasslands were minimal, but ANPP (169 g·m−2·a−1 and 198 g·m−2·a−1, respectively) and the BNPP to ANPP ratio (4.87 and 2.40, respectively) differed significantly. Across continents and grazing practices, climate had a greater role in regulating grassland biomass allocation than altitude, and warming may have a more detrimental impact on grazed grasslands than non-grazed grasslands. Distinct biomass allocation trends under various continental and grazing conditions exert effects on the economic and ecological functions of grasslands. Our study underscores the need for balanced grassland utilization strategies at a global scale. This involves optimizing grazing in high ANPP grasslands and protecting those with significant BNPP, thereby contributing to a sustainable and ecologically sound use of grasslands in the future.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.