用多种夜间和白天滤波方法计算山区森林涡度协方差得出的生态系统一氧化碳[公式省略]净交换量的一致性

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
{"title":"用多种夜间和白天滤波方法计算山区森林涡度协方差得出的生态系统一氧化碳[公式省略]净交换量的一致性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The assessment of net ecosystem CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> exchange often relies on eddy covariance measurements. Under stable, low-turbulence conditions, the measured flux may not be representative of the net ecosystem exchange (NEE), as unmeasured fluxes (e.g., advection) can become relevant. Consequently, such periods need to be filtered out for robust flux calculations. Typically, the focus lies on nighttime filtering alone, yet daytime flux measurements can also be unrepresentative. This study evaluates well-established and novel filtering methods applied both at nighttime and daytime at a mountain forest site in Tyrol, Austria (Forest-Atmosphere-Interaction-Research (FAIR) site, AT-Mmg). Established methods, including friction velocity filtering, its counterpart using the standard deviation of vertical velocity fluctuations (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) and an after-sunset flux maxima approach (commonly referred to as <em>van Gorsel method</em>), are compared. Additionally, we use a more recent approach with a physically-derived measure of flow decoupling for filtering. Moreover, we introduce a novel K-means clustering approach that groups flow situations into clusters based on vertical profiles of temperature, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and wind speed. Clusters in which the measured flux is expected to be a reasonable NEE estimate are retained. Such scenarios are Foehn periods, early-night situations with high turbulence and low stability, or well-mixed afternoon conditions. Despite being based on widely differing assumptions, the various filtering approaches yielded similar carbon budget estimates over 14 months of measurements (-224 to -286 g C m<sup>−2</sup> for nighttime filtering and -440 to -382 g C m<sup>−2</sup> for all-day filtering), in contrast to the unfiltered budget of -534 g C m<sup>−2</sup>. Nighttime filtering results in higher respiration rates throughout the night, while daytime filtering suggests increased morning carbon uptake compared to unfiltered data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324002867/pdfft?md5=41ffbd20d6a649c4c990d2b0f11c9c23&pid=1-s2.0-S0168192324002867-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement of multiple night- and daytime filtering approaches of eddy covariance-derived net ecosystem CO2 exchange over a mountain forest\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The assessment of net ecosystem CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> exchange often relies on eddy covariance measurements. Under stable, low-turbulence conditions, the measured flux may not be representative of the net ecosystem exchange (NEE), as unmeasured fluxes (e.g., advection) can become relevant. Consequently, such periods need to be filtered out for robust flux calculations. Typically, the focus lies on nighttime filtering alone, yet daytime flux measurements can also be unrepresentative. This study evaluates well-established and novel filtering methods applied both at nighttime and daytime at a mountain forest site in Tyrol, Austria (Forest-Atmosphere-Interaction-Research (FAIR) site, AT-Mmg). Established methods, including friction velocity filtering, its counterpart using the standard deviation of vertical velocity fluctuations (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) and an after-sunset flux maxima approach (commonly referred to as <em>van Gorsel method</em>), are compared. Additionally, we use a more recent approach with a physically-derived measure of flow decoupling for filtering. Moreover, we introduce a novel K-means clustering approach that groups flow situations into clusters based on vertical profiles of temperature, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and wind speed. Clusters in which the measured flux is expected to be a reasonable NEE estimate are retained. Such scenarios are Foehn periods, early-night situations with high turbulence and low stability, or well-mixed afternoon conditions. Despite being based on widely differing assumptions, the various filtering approaches yielded similar carbon budget estimates over 14 months of measurements (-224 to -286 g C m<sup>−2</sup> for nighttime filtering and -440 to -382 g C m<sup>−2</sup> for all-day filtering), in contrast to the unfiltered budget of -534 g C m<sup>−2</sup>. Nighttime filtering results in higher respiration rates throughout the night, while daytime filtering suggests increased morning carbon uptake compared to unfiltered data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324002867/pdfft?md5=41ffbd20d6a649c4c990d2b0f11c9c23&pid=1-s2.0-S0168192324002867-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324002867\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324002867","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对生态系统二氧化碳净交换量的评估通常依赖于涡度协方差测量。在稳定、低湍流条件下,测量到的通量可能并不代表生态系统净交换量(NEE),因为未测量到的通量(如平流)可能与之相关。因此,为了进行可靠的通量计算,需要过滤掉这些时段。通常情况下,重点仅放在夜间过滤上,但白天的通量测量也可能不具代表性。本研究评估了在奥地利蒂罗尔州一个山林站点(森林-大气-交互作用研究(FAIR)站点,AT-Mmg)应用于夜间和白天的成熟和新型过滤方法。比较了摩擦速度过滤法、垂直速度波动标准偏差法()和日落后通量最大值法(通常称为)等成熟方法。此外,我们还使用了一种更新颖的方法,用物理方法测量流量解耦进行过滤。此外,我们还引入了一种新颖的 K-means 聚类方法,根据温度和风速的垂直剖面将流量情况分组。在这些聚类中,测得的流量有望成为合理的 NEE 估计值。这些情况包括 Foehn 时段、高湍流和低稳定性的初夜情况或混合良好的午后情况。尽管基于的假设大相径庭,但在 14 个月的测量中,不同的过滤方法得出了相似的碳预算估计值(夜间过滤为 -224 至 -286 g C m,全天过滤为 -440 至 -382 g C m),而未经过滤的预算为 -534 g C m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Agreement of multiple night- and daytime filtering approaches of eddy covariance-derived net ecosystem CO2 exchange over a mountain forest

Agreement of multiple night- and daytime filtering approaches of eddy covariance-derived net ecosystem CO2 exchange over a mountain forest

The assessment of net ecosystem CO2 exchange often relies on eddy covariance measurements. Under stable, low-turbulence conditions, the measured flux may not be representative of the net ecosystem exchange (NEE), as unmeasured fluxes (e.g., advection) can become relevant. Consequently, such periods need to be filtered out for robust flux calculations. Typically, the focus lies on nighttime filtering alone, yet daytime flux measurements can also be unrepresentative. This study evaluates well-established and novel filtering methods applied both at nighttime and daytime at a mountain forest site in Tyrol, Austria (Forest-Atmosphere-Interaction-Research (FAIR) site, AT-Mmg). Established methods, including friction velocity filtering, its counterpart using the standard deviation of vertical velocity fluctuations (σw) and an after-sunset flux maxima approach (commonly referred to as van Gorsel method), are compared. Additionally, we use a more recent approach with a physically-derived measure of flow decoupling for filtering. Moreover, we introduce a novel K-means clustering approach that groups flow situations into clusters based on vertical profiles of temperature, σw and wind speed. Clusters in which the measured flux is expected to be a reasonable NEE estimate are retained. Such scenarios are Foehn periods, early-night situations with high turbulence and low stability, or well-mixed afternoon conditions. Despite being based on widely differing assumptions, the various filtering approaches yielded similar carbon budget estimates over 14 months of measurements (-224 to -286 g C m−2 for nighttime filtering and -440 to -382 g C m−2 for all-day filtering), in contrast to the unfiltered budget of -534 g C m−2. Nighttime filtering results in higher respiration rates throughout the night, while daytime filtering suggests increased morning carbon uptake compared to unfiltered data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信