逆风还是顺风?COVID-19 大流行期间共享单车和打车需求的演变

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
{"title":"逆风还是顺风?COVID-19 大流行期间共享单车和打车需求的演变","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reshaped travel patterns globally, prompting shifts in mobility preferences and behaviors. After controling for temporal trends and weather, this paper investigates the impacts of the pandemic on station-based bike-sharing and ride-hailing services in New York City (NYC), spanning the periods before, during, and after the pandemic. Specifically, we examine how these transportation modes evolved across various land-use types and pandemic periods. To achieve this, we employ a spatial clustering method to group NYC traffic zones into distinct functional areas, i.e., Mixed Area, Commercial Area, Residential Area, and Educational Area, based on land use characteristics. Subsequently, we develop two time series models based on the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables (SARIMAX) model to analyze the impact of the pandemic on trip demand across different spatial areas and years. Our modeling analysis enables us to precisely quantify the average effects of pandemic phases on daily trip ridership, while also assessing shifts in daily trip demand trends across each COVID phase, accounting for variables such as land use and weather. Our findings uncover strikingly different recovery trajectories for bike-sharing and ride-hailing services. Bike-sharing rapidly rebounded, surpassing pre-pandemic trip levels by the end of the reopening phase. In contrast, ride-hailing has not yet fully recovered and continues to lag behind its pre-pandemic levels. Moreover, we observe disparities in cycling recovery across various land-use types, with Mixed and Residential Areas exhibiting faster recovery compared to Commercial and Educational zones. The varying recovery patterns can be attributed to evolving traveler sentiments and preferences, shifts in trip needs and purposes, and the implementation of local policies aimed at fostering sustainable transportation options.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324001534/pdfft?md5=4a3a75805d7fda2fa956fef330e1409f&pid=1-s2.0-S0966692324001534-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Headwind or tailwind? The evolution of bike-sharing and ride-hailing demand during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reshaped travel patterns globally, prompting shifts in mobility preferences and behaviors. After controling for temporal trends and weather, this paper investigates the impacts of the pandemic on station-based bike-sharing and ride-hailing services in New York City (NYC), spanning the periods before, during, and after the pandemic. Specifically, we examine how these transportation modes evolved across various land-use types and pandemic periods. To achieve this, we employ a spatial clustering method to group NYC traffic zones into distinct functional areas, i.e., Mixed Area, Commercial Area, Residential Area, and Educational Area, based on land use characteristics. Subsequently, we develop two time series models based on the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables (SARIMAX) model to analyze the impact of the pandemic on trip demand across different spatial areas and years. Our modeling analysis enables us to precisely quantify the average effects of pandemic phases on daily trip ridership, while also assessing shifts in daily trip demand trends across each COVID phase, accounting for variables such as land use and weather. Our findings uncover strikingly different recovery trajectories for bike-sharing and ride-hailing services. Bike-sharing rapidly rebounded, surpassing pre-pandemic trip levels by the end of the reopening phase. In contrast, ride-hailing has not yet fully recovered and continues to lag behind its pre-pandemic levels. Moreover, we observe disparities in cycling recovery across various land-use types, with Mixed and Residential Areas exhibiting faster recovery compared to Commercial and Educational zones. The varying recovery patterns can be attributed to evolving traveler sentiments and preferences, shifts in trip needs and purposes, and the implementation of local policies aimed at fostering sustainable transportation options.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324001534/pdfft?md5=4a3a75805d7fda2fa956fef330e1409f&pid=1-s2.0-S0966692324001534-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324001534\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324001534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行极大地重塑了全球的出行模式,促使人们的出行偏好和行为发生转变。在控制了时间趋势和天气因素后,本文研究了大流行对纽约市(NYC)车站共享单车和打车服务的影响,时间跨度包括大流行之前、期间和之后。具体而言,我们研究了这些交通模式在不同土地使用类型和大流行时期的演变情况。为此,我们采用空间聚类方法,根据土地使用特征将纽约市交通区域划分为不同的功能区,即混合区、商业区、住宅区和教育区。随后,我们建立了两个基于季节自回归综合移动平均与外生变量(SARIMAX)模型的时间序列模型,以分析大流行病对不同空间区域和年份的出行需求的影响。我们的建模分析使我们能够精确量化大流行病各阶段对每日出行乘客量的平均影响,同时还能评估 COVID 各阶段每日出行需求趋势的变化,并将土地使用和天气等变量考虑在内。我们的发现揭示了共享单车和打车服务截然不同的恢复轨迹。共享单车迅速反弹,在重新开放阶段结束时超过了大流行前的出行水平。相比之下,打车服务尚未完全恢复,仍然落后于大流行前的水平。此外,我们还观察到不同土地使用类型的单车恢复情况存在差异,混合区和住宅区的恢复速度快于商业区和教育区。不同的恢复模式可归因于不断变化的旅客情绪和偏好、出行需求和目的的转变,以及旨在促进可持续交通选择的地方政策的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Headwind or tailwind? The evolution of bike-sharing and ride-hailing demand during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reshaped travel patterns globally, prompting shifts in mobility preferences and behaviors. After controling for temporal trends and weather, this paper investigates the impacts of the pandemic on station-based bike-sharing and ride-hailing services in New York City (NYC), spanning the periods before, during, and after the pandemic. Specifically, we examine how these transportation modes evolved across various land-use types and pandemic periods. To achieve this, we employ a spatial clustering method to group NYC traffic zones into distinct functional areas, i.e., Mixed Area, Commercial Area, Residential Area, and Educational Area, based on land use characteristics. Subsequently, we develop two time series models based on the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous variables (SARIMAX) model to analyze the impact of the pandemic on trip demand across different spatial areas and years. Our modeling analysis enables us to precisely quantify the average effects of pandemic phases on daily trip ridership, while also assessing shifts in daily trip demand trends across each COVID phase, accounting for variables such as land use and weather. Our findings uncover strikingly different recovery trajectories for bike-sharing and ride-hailing services. Bike-sharing rapidly rebounded, surpassing pre-pandemic trip levels by the end of the reopening phase. In contrast, ride-hailing has not yet fully recovered and continues to lag behind its pre-pandemic levels. Moreover, we observe disparities in cycling recovery across various land-use types, with Mixed and Residential Areas exhibiting faster recovery compared to Commercial and Educational zones. The varying recovery patterns can be attributed to evolving traveler sentiments and preferences, shifts in trip needs and purposes, and the implementation of local policies aimed at fostering sustainable transportation options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信