[Evaluation of molecular diagnosis of tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin with GeneXpert® MTB/RIF in Algeria].

Objective: 1) To evaluate the contribution of the GeneXpert^® MTB/RIF (GX) test in the diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis compared to culture. 2) To compare the rifampicin results resistance obtained by GX with the phenotypic sensitivity test.

Materials and methods: Retrospective study carried out over a period of five years, from May 2017 to June 2022 at the microbiology laboratory of the Central army Hospital Mohamed Seghir Nekkache, Algiers (Algeria). The pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical specimens were collected, cultivated, tested by GX PCR and direct examination by Ziehl-Neelsen staining. The study of sensitivity to antituberculosis drugs was performed according to the proportion method on liquid medium Bactec MGIT 960 (or on solid medium Lowenstein-Jensen at the Algerian Pasteur Institute).

Results: 310 samples were included in the final analysis of the study, of which 156 were of pulmonary origin and 154 of extrapulmonary origin. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) was detected in 95 samples from 88 tuberculosis patients (sex ratio 2,03 and middle age 37 years) with 49 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and 39 cases of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. For 2 cases, the GX was positive while the culture was negative and for 11 cases, the GX was negative while the culture was positive. Thus, in our study and compared to culture, GX showed an overall sensitivity of 88.2%, a specificity of 98.6%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.2%. The analysis of the data according to the type of samples, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of GX for the pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples were 96.3% vs. 77.0%, 98.0% vs. 99.1%, 96.2% vs. 96.5% and 98.0% vs. 92.7% respectively. The sensitivity of GX for disco-vertebral, lymph node, meningeal and pleural tuberculosis were 100%, 90.0%, 71.4% and 57.1% respectively. The sensitivity of GX for pulmonary tuberculosis compared to microscopy was 96% vs. 68%. The comparison of the results of detection of resistance to rifampicin by GX and by phenotypic methods showed perfect agreement.

Discussion and conclusion: A good sensitivity of GX compared to microscopy was revealed. The GX is a useful tool for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-negative cases. The sensitivity of GX in extrapulmonary tuberculosis varied depending on the location of the infection. A negative result by GX does not exclude tuberculosis and cases of resistance to RIF detected by GX must be confirmed by phenotypic method.