青少年足球运动员的听觉干扰和眼球运动反应与头部次撞击的关系

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2023.0125
Zachary S Bellini, Grace O Recht, Taylor R Zuidema, Kyle A Kercher, Sage H Sweeney, Jesse A Steinfeldt, Keisuke Kawata
{"title":"青少年足球运动员的听觉干扰和眼球运动反应与头部次撞击的关系","authors":"Zachary S Bellini, Grace O Recht, Taylor R Zuidema, Kyle A Kercher, Sage H Sweeney, Jesse A Steinfeldt, Keisuke Kawata","doi":"10.1089/neur.2023.0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine whether neuro-ophthalmological function, as assessed by the King-Devick test (KDT), alters during a high school football season and to explore the role of auditory interference on the sensitivity of KDT. During the 2021 and 2022 high school football seasons, football players' neuro-ophthalmological function was assessed at five time points (preseason, three in-season, postseason), whereas control athletes were assessed at preseason and postseason. Two-hundred ten football players and 80 control athletes participated in the study. The year 1 cohort (<i>n</i> = 94 football, <i>n</i> = 10 control) was tested with a conventional KDT, whereas the year 2 cohort (<i>n</i> = 116 football, <i>n</i> = 70 control) was tested with KDT while listening to loud traffic sounds to induce auditory interference. There were improvements in KDT during a season among football players, regardless of conventional KDT (preseason 53.4 ± 9.3 vs. postseason 46.4 ± 8.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.01) or KDT with auditory interference (preseason 52.3 ± 11.5 vs. postseason 45.1 ± 9.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.11, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The degree of improvement was similar between the tests, with no significant group-by-time interaction (β = -0.08, SE = 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.65). The control athletes also improved KDT performance at a similar degree as the football cohorts in both KDT conditions. Our data suggest that KDT performance improves during a season, regardless of auditory interference or head impact exposure. KDT performance was not impacted by a noisy environment, supporting its sideline utility for screening more severe forms of injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"512-521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Auditory Interference and Ocular-Motor Response with Subconcussive Head Impacts in Adolescent Football Players.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary S Bellini, Grace O Recht, Taylor R Zuidema, Kyle A Kercher, Sage H Sweeney, Jesse A Steinfeldt, Keisuke Kawata\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neur.2023.0125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine whether neuro-ophthalmological function, as assessed by the King-Devick test (KDT), alters during a high school football season and to explore the role of auditory interference on the sensitivity of KDT. During the 2021 and 2022 high school football seasons, football players' neuro-ophthalmological function was assessed at five time points (preseason, three in-season, postseason), whereas control athletes were assessed at preseason and postseason. Two-hundred ten football players and 80 control athletes participated in the study. The year 1 cohort (<i>n</i> = 94 football, <i>n</i> = 10 control) was tested with a conventional KDT, whereas the year 2 cohort (<i>n</i> = 116 football, <i>n</i> = 70 control) was tested with KDT while listening to loud traffic sounds to induce auditory interference. There were improvements in KDT during a season among football players, regardless of conventional KDT (preseason 53.4 ± 9.3 vs. postseason 46.4 ± 8.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.01) or KDT with auditory interference (preseason 52.3 ± 11.5 vs. postseason 45.1 ± 9.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.11, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The degree of improvement was similar between the tests, with no significant group-by-time interaction (β = -0.08, SE = 0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.65). The control athletes also improved KDT performance at a similar degree as the football cohorts in both KDT conditions. Our data suggest that KDT performance improves during a season, regardless of auditory interference or head impact exposure. KDT performance was not impacted by a noisy environment, supporting its sideline utility for screening more severe forms of injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurotrauma reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"512-521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurotrauma reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在高中橄榄球赛季中,通过 King-Devick 测试(KDT)评估的神经眼科功能是否会发生变化,并探索听觉干扰对 KDT 灵敏度的影响。在 2021 年和 2022 年高中橄榄球赛季期间,在五个时间点(季前赛、季中赛、季后赛)对橄榄球运动员的神经眼科功能进行了评估,而在季前赛和季后赛对对照组运动员进行了评估。共有 210 名足球运动员和 80 名对照组运动员参加了这项研究。第一年的队列(94 名足球运动员,10 名对照组运动员)使用传统的 KDT 进行测试,而第二年的队列(116 名足球运动员,70 名对照组运动员)则使用 KDT 进行测试,同时聆听响亮的交通声音以诱发听觉干扰。在一个赛季中,不论是传统的 KDT(季前赛 53.4 ± 9.3 vs. 季后赛 46.4 ± 8.5 秒;β = -1.7, SE = 0.12, p < 0.01)还是听觉干扰下的 KDT(季前赛 52.3 ± 11.5 vs. 季后赛 45.1 ± 9.5 秒;β = -1.7, SE = 0.11, p < 0.001),足球运动员的 KDT 都有所提高。不同测试之间的改善程度相似,没有明显的组间时间交互作用(β = -0.08,SE = 0.17,p = 0.65)。对照组运动员在两种 KDT 条件下的 KDT 成绩提高程度也与足球组相似。我们的数据表明,无论听觉干扰或头部撞击情况如何,KDT 成绩在一个赛季中都会提高。KDT 性能不受嘈杂环境的影响,这支持了其在筛查更严重形式损伤时的边线效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Auditory Interference and Ocular-Motor Response with Subconcussive Head Impacts in Adolescent Football Players.

The aim of this study was to examine whether neuro-ophthalmological function, as assessed by the King-Devick test (KDT), alters during a high school football season and to explore the role of auditory interference on the sensitivity of KDT. During the 2021 and 2022 high school football seasons, football players' neuro-ophthalmological function was assessed at five time points (preseason, three in-season, postseason), whereas control athletes were assessed at preseason and postseason. Two-hundred ten football players and 80 control athletes participated in the study. The year 1 cohort (n = 94 football, n = 10 control) was tested with a conventional KDT, whereas the year 2 cohort (n = 116 football, n = 70 control) was tested with KDT while listening to loud traffic sounds to induce auditory interference. There were improvements in KDT during a season among football players, regardless of conventional KDT (preseason 53.4 ± 9.3 vs. postseason 46.4 ± 8.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.12, p < 0.01) or KDT with auditory interference (preseason 52.3 ± 11.5 vs. postseason 45.1 ± 9.5 sec; β = -1.7, SE = 0.11, p < 0.001). The degree of improvement was similar between the tests, with no significant group-by-time interaction (β = -0.08, SE = 0.17, p = 0.65). The control athletes also improved KDT performance at a similar degree as the football cohorts in both KDT conditions. Our data suggest that KDT performance improves during a season, regardless of auditory interference or head impact exposure. KDT performance was not impacted by a noisy environment, supporting its sideline utility for screening more severe forms of injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信