割草后的第二天:除草时间和类型对草地节肢动物的影响

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Johanna L. Berger, Michael Staab, Margarita Hartlieb, Nadja K. Simons, Konstans Wells, Martin M. Gossner, Juliane Vogt, Rafael Achury, Sebastian Seibold, Andreas Hemp, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Nico Blüthgen
{"title":"割草后的第二天:除草时间和类型对草地节肢动物的影响","authors":"Johanna L. Berger,&nbsp;Michael Staab,&nbsp;Margarita Hartlieb,&nbsp;Nadja K. Simons,&nbsp;Konstans Wells,&nbsp;Martin M. Gossner,&nbsp;Juliane Vogt,&nbsp;Rafael Achury,&nbsp;Sebastian Seibold,&nbsp;Andreas Hemp,&nbsp;Wolfgang W. Weisser,&nbsp;Nico Blüthgen","doi":"10.1002/eap.3022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent losses in the abundance and diversity of arthropods have been documented in many regions and ecosystems. In grasslands, such insect declines are largely attributed to land use, including modern machinery and mowing regimes. However, the effects of different mowing techniques on arthropods remain poorly understood. Using 11 years of data from 111 agricultural grassland plots across Germany, we analyzed the influence of various grassland management variables on the abundance and abundance-accounted species richness of four arthropod orders: Araneae, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Orthoptera. The analysis focused on detailed mowing information, for example, days after mowing and mower type, and compared their effect with other aspects of grassland management, that is, rolling, leveling, fertilization, and grazing. We found strong negative effects of mowing on all four arthropod orders, with arthropod abundance being lowest directly after mowing and steadily increasing to three to seven times the abundance after 100 days post-mowing. Likewise, Hemiptera and Coleoptera species richness was 30% higher 100 days after mowing. Mower width showed a positive effect on Orthoptera abundance, but not on the other arthropods. Arthropod abundance and Coleoptera species richness were lowest when a mulcher was used compared to rotary or bar mowers. In addition to mowing, intensive grazing negatively affected Orthoptera abundance but not the other orders. Mowing represents a highly disturbing and iterative stressor with negative effects on arthropod abundance and diversity, likely contributed by mowing-induced mortality and habitat alteration. While modifications of mowing techniques such as mower type or mowing height and width may help to reduce the negative impact of mowing on arthropods, our results show that mowing itself has the most substantial negative effect. Based on our results, we suggest that reduced mowing frequency, omission of mowing in parts of the grassland (refuges), or extensive grazing instead of mowing have the greatest potential to promote arthropod populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.3022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The day after mowing: Time and type of mowing influence grassland arthropods\",\"authors\":\"Johanna L. Berger,&nbsp;Michael Staab,&nbsp;Margarita Hartlieb,&nbsp;Nadja K. Simons,&nbsp;Konstans Wells,&nbsp;Martin M. Gossner,&nbsp;Juliane Vogt,&nbsp;Rafael Achury,&nbsp;Sebastian Seibold,&nbsp;Andreas Hemp,&nbsp;Wolfgang W. Weisser,&nbsp;Nico Blüthgen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.3022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent losses in the abundance and diversity of arthropods have been documented in many regions and ecosystems. In grasslands, such insect declines are largely attributed to land use, including modern machinery and mowing regimes. However, the effects of different mowing techniques on arthropods remain poorly understood. Using 11 years of data from 111 agricultural grassland plots across Germany, we analyzed the influence of various grassland management variables on the abundance and abundance-accounted species richness of four arthropod orders: Araneae, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Orthoptera. The analysis focused on detailed mowing information, for example, days after mowing and mower type, and compared their effect with other aspects of grassland management, that is, rolling, leveling, fertilization, and grazing. We found strong negative effects of mowing on all four arthropod orders, with arthropod abundance being lowest directly after mowing and steadily increasing to three to seven times the abundance after 100 days post-mowing. Likewise, Hemiptera and Coleoptera species richness was 30% higher 100 days after mowing. Mower width showed a positive effect on Orthoptera abundance, but not on the other arthropods. Arthropod abundance and Coleoptera species richness were lowest when a mulcher was used compared to rotary or bar mowers. In addition to mowing, intensive grazing negatively affected Orthoptera abundance but not the other orders. Mowing represents a highly disturbing and iterative stressor with negative effects on arthropod abundance and diversity, likely contributed by mowing-induced mortality and habitat alteration. While modifications of mowing techniques such as mower type or mowing height and width may help to reduce the negative impact of mowing on arthropods, our results show that mowing itself has the most substantial negative effect. Based on our results, we suggest that reduced mowing frequency, omission of mowing in parts of the grassland (refuges), or extensive grazing instead of mowing have the greatest potential to promote arthropod populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.3022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.3022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.3022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多地区和生态系统都有节肢动物数量和多样性减少的记录。在草地上,这种昆虫数量的减少在很大程度上归因于土地的使用,包括现代机械和割草制度。然而,人们对不同割草技术对节肢动物的影响仍然知之甚少。利用德国 111 块农用草地 11 年的数据,我们分析了各种草地管理变量对四种节肢动物的丰度和丰度计算物种丰富度的影响:鞘翅目、鞘翅目、半翅目和直翅目。分析的重点是详细的割草信息,例如割草后的天数和割草机类型,并将其与草地管理的其他方面(即碾压、平整、施肥和放牧)的影响进行比较。我们发现,刈割对所有四种节肢动物都有强烈的负面影响,刈割后节肢动物的数量直接降到最低,并在刈割后 100 天稳步增加到原来的三到七倍。同样,半翅目和鞘翅目物种丰富度在除草 100 天后增加了 30%。割草宽度对直翅目昆虫的数量有积极影响,但对其他节肢动物没有影响。与旋转式或条形割草机相比,使用除草机时节肢动物的数量和鞘翅目物种丰富度最低。除除草外,密集放牧对直翅目昆虫的数量也有负面影响,但对其他目没有影响。除草对节肢动物的丰度和多样性有负面影响,可能是除草引起的死亡和生境改变造成的。虽然对割草技术(如割草机类型或割草高度和宽度)的改进可能有助于减少割草对节肢动物的负面影响,但我们的研究结果表明,割草本身的负面影响最大。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议减少割草频率、在部分草地(保护区)不进行割草或以大面积放牧代替割草,这些方法最有可能促进节肢动物数量的增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The day after mowing: Time and type of mowing influence grassland arthropods

The day after mowing: Time and type of mowing influence grassland arthropods

Recent losses in the abundance and diversity of arthropods have been documented in many regions and ecosystems. In grasslands, such insect declines are largely attributed to land use, including modern machinery and mowing regimes. However, the effects of different mowing techniques on arthropods remain poorly understood. Using 11 years of data from 111 agricultural grassland plots across Germany, we analyzed the influence of various grassland management variables on the abundance and abundance-accounted species richness of four arthropod orders: Araneae, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Orthoptera. The analysis focused on detailed mowing information, for example, days after mowing and mower type, and compared their effect with other aspects of grassland management, that is, rolling, leveling, fertilization, and grazing. We found strong negative effects of mowing on all four arthropod orders, with arthropod abundance being lowest directly after mowing and steadily increasing to three to seven times the abundance after 100 days post-mowing. Likewise, Hemiptera and Coleoptera species richness was 30% higher 100 days after mowing. Mower width showed a positive effect on Orthoptera abundance, but not on the other arthropods. Arthropod abundance and Coleoptera species richness were lowest when a mulcher was used compared to rotary or bar mowers. In addition to mowing, intensive grazing negatively affected Orthoptera abundance but not the other orders. Mowing represents a highly disturbing and iterative stressor with negative effects on arthropod abundance and diversity, likely contributed by mowing-induced mortality and habitat alteration. While modifications of mowing techniques such as mower type or mowing height and width may help to reduce the negative impact of mowing on arthropods, our results show that mowing itself has the most substantial negative effect. Based on our results, we suggest that reduced mowing frequency, omission of mowing in parts of the grassland (refuges), or extensive grazing instead of mowing have the greatest potential to promote arthropod populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信