与面对面审查相比,虚拟皮肤病变评估咨询可减少碳足迹。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Leah Jones, Karen Koch, Amanda Oakley
{"title":"与面对面审查相比,虚拟皮肤病变评估咨询可减少碳足迹。","authors":"Leah Jones, Karen Koch, Amanda Oakley","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-08-23-6937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Climate change is one of the biggest threats to the healthcare sector. In addition, healthcare contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Virtual consultations are a growing tool to assess patients. The carbon emissions from virtual consultations have the potential to be much smaller than in-person consultations, predominantly through reduced transportation. This study assesses the carbon footprint of general practitioner referrals for skin lesions evaluated by a store-and-forward teledermatology service compared to an estimated equivalent in-person review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The carbon footprint of virtual consultations for skin lesions was compared to estimated equivalent in-person reviews based on the average transportation modalities in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Virtual consultations for 484 patients resulted in an average saving of 48 km and 11.17 kg carbon dioxide equivalent per consultation compared to equivalent in-person review.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study encourages the use of store-and-forward skin lesion assessment as a way of reducing carbon emissions in the healthcare sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual consultations for skin lesion assessment reduce carbon footprint compared to in-person reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Leah Jones, Karen Koch, Amanda Oakley\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-08-23-6937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Climate change is one of the biggest threats to the healthcare sector. In addition, healthcare contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Virtual consultations are a growing tool to assess patients. The carbon emissions from virtual consultations have the potential to be much smaller than in-person consultations, predominantly through reduced transportation. This study assesses the carbon footprint of general practitioner referrals for skin lesions evaluated by a store-and-forward teledermatology service compared to an estimated equivalent in-person review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The carbon footprint of virtual consultations for skin lesions was compared to estimated equivalent in-person reviews based on the average transportation modalities in New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Virtual consultations for 484 patients resulted in an average saving of 48 km and 11.17 kg carbon dioxide equivalent per consultation compared to equivalent in-person review.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study encourages the use of store-and-forward skin lesion assessment as a way of reducing carbon emissions in the healthcare sector.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-08-23-6937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-08-23-6937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:气候变化是医疗保健行业面临的最大威胁之一。此外,医疗保健也是温室气体排放的重要来源。虚拟会诊是一种不断发展的评估病人的工具。虚拟会诊的碳排放量有可能比面对面会诊少得多,主要是通过减少交通。本研究评估了全科医生转诊皮肤病患者时,通过存储转发式远程皮肤病学服务评估皮肤病变的碳足迹,并与估计的同等当面复查进行了比较:方法:根据新西兰的平均交通方式,将皮损虚拟会诊的碳足迹与估计的等效当面复查进行比较:结果:为 484 名患者提供虚拟会诊与等效的亲自复查相比,每次会诊平均节省 48 千米和 11.17 千克二氧化碳当量:讨论:本研究鼓励使用存储转发皮损评估作为医疗保健行业减少碳排放的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual consultations for skin lesion assessment reduce carbon footprint compared to in-person reviews.

Background and objectives: Climate change is one of the biggest threats to the healthcare sector. In addition, healthcare contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Virtual consultations are a growing tool to assess patients. The carbon emissions from virtual consultations have the potential to be much smaller than in-person consultations, predominantly through reduced transportation. This study assesses the carbon footprint of general practitioner referrals for skin lesions evaluated by a store-and-forward teledermatology service compared to an estimated equivalent in-person review.

Method: The carbon footprint of virtual consultations for skin lesions was compared to estimated equivalent in-person reviews based on the average transportation modalities in New Zealand.

Results: Virtual consultations for 484 patients resulted in an average saving of 48 km and 11.17 kg carbon dioxide equivalent per consultation compared to equivalent in-person review.

Discussion: This study encourages the use of store-and-forward skin lesion assessment as a way of reducing carbon emissions in the healthcare sector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信