周末因素:对医疗质量的影响。一项医学法律回顾性研究。

Q2 Medicine
G N Piras, U Baggio, V Tortorella, L Storace, F Negro, E Marinelli
{"title":"周末因素:对医疗质量的影响。一项医学法律回顾性研究。","authors":"G N Piras, U Baggio, V Tortorella, L Storace, F Negro, E Marinelli","doi":"10.7417/CT.2024.5120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the healthcare system, in the last 30 years, the prognostically negative value of the so-called Weekend Effect (WE) has been internationally recognized. The WE is regarded as the increased risk a patient might incur when hospitalized during non-working days, of enduring severe complications in comparison to the same hospitalization that occur on working days. The aim of this study was to retrospectively verify whether, once a mistake was made during weekends or on holidays, in comparison to a mistake occurred on workdays, it subsequently implied a higher risk of complications, death included, in a statistical and medico-legal way.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three different evaluators independently examined a total of 378 medico-legal cases over a more than 20-year period. Eventual medical actions and omissions were labelled as 'mistake' when the AJ claimed that at least one occurred; 'alleged mistake' included the cases where the EW's report disagreed with the AJ's one; finally, 'no mistake' when both the AJ and the EW agreed in their evaluations. During weekends there is a higher risk that a mistake occurs (OR=3.3, 95% CI=1.6;7.4; p-value<0.001) compared to weekdays. When death occurs, delayed diagnosis is the main cause (p=0.02), whereas a damaging action is more frequently claimed in general.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We verified as actual the impact of the WE on patients' outcome from a medico-legal point of view. The implications for an improvement of the several settings of the Italian NHS are various, and many are the consequences in the healthcare management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50686,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Terapeutica","volume":"175 Suppl 2(4)","pages":"213-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The weekend factor: the effect on healthcare quality. A medico-legal, retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"G N Piras, U Baggio, V Tortorella, L Storace, F Negro, E Marinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.7417/CT.2024.5120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the healthcare system, in the last 30 years, the prognostically negative value of the so-called Weekend Effect (WE) has been internationally recognized. The WE is regarded as the increased risk a patient might incur when hospitalized during non-working days, of enduring severe complications in comparison to the same hospitalization that occur on working days. The aim of this study was to retrospectively verify whether, once a mistake was made during weekends or on holidays, in comparison to a mistake occurred on workdays, it subsequently implied a higher risk of complications, death included, in a statistical and medico-legal way.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three different evaluators independently examined a total of 378 medico-legal cases over a more than 20-year period. Eventual medical actions and omissions were labelled as 'mistake' when the AJ claimed that at least one occurred; 'alleged mistake' included the cases where the EW's report disagreed with the AJ's one; finally, 'no mistake' when both the AJ and the EW agreed in their evaluations. During weekends there is a higher risk that a mistake occurs (OR=3.3, 95% CI=1.6;7.4; p-value<0.001) compared to weekdays. When death occurs, delayed diagnosis is the main cause (p=0.02), whereas a damaging action is more frequently claimed in general.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We verified as actual the impact of the WE on patients' outcome from a medico-legal point of view. The implications for an improvement of the several settings of the Italian NHS are various, and many are the consequences in the healthcare management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica Terapeutica\",\"volume\":\"175 Suppl 2(4)\",\"pages\":\"213-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica Terapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2024.5120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Terapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2024.5120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在医疗系统中,过去 30 年来,所谓的 "周末效应"(WE)在预后方面的负面价值已得到国际公认。周末效应被认为是指患者在非工作日住院治疗时,与工作日住院治疗相比,可能会增加患严重并发症的风险。本研究旨在通过统计和医学法律的方式,回顾性地验证一旦在周末或节假日犯错,与在工作日犯错相比,是否意味着随后出现并发症(包括死亡)的风险更高:方法:三位不同的评估人员在 20 多年的时间里独立审查了 378 个医疗法律案件。最终的医疗行为和疏忽被标记为 "失误",前提是主治医师声称至少发生了一起医疗行为和疏忽;"所谓失误 "包括紧急医疗人员的报告与主治医师的报告不一致的情况;最后,"无失误 "是指主治医师和紧急医疗人员的评估意见一致。周末发生错误的风险较高(OR=3.3,95% CI=1.6;7.4;p 值):我们从医学法律的角度验证了WE对患者预后的实际影响。这对改善意大利国家医疗服务体系的各种设置具有多方面的意义,并对医疗管理产生了许多影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The weekend factor: the effect on healthcare quality. A medico-legal, retrospective study.

Background: In the healthcare system, in the last 30 years, the prognostically negative value of the so-called Weekend Effect (WE) has been internationally recognized. The WE is regarded as the increased risk a patient might incur when hospitalized during non-working days, of enduring severe complications in comparison to the same hospitalization that occur on working days. The aim of this study was to retrospectively verify whether, once a mistake was made during weekends or on holidays, in comparison to a mistake occurred on workdays, it subsequently implied a higher risk of complications, death included, in a statistical and medico-legal way.

Methods: Three different evaluators independently examined a total of 378 medico-legal cases over a more than 20-year period. Eventual medical actions and omissions were labelled as 'mistake' when the AJ claimed that at least one occurred; 'alleged mistake' included the cases where the EW's report disagreed with the AJ's one; finally, 'no mistake' when both the AJ and the EW agreed in their evaluations. During weekends there is a higher risk that a mistake occurs (OR=3.3, 95% CI=1.6;7.4; p-value<0.001) compared to weekdays. When death occurs, delayed diagnosis is the main cause (p=0.02), whereas a damaging action is more frequently claimed in general.

Conclusions: We verified as actual the impact of the WE on patients' outcome from a medico-legal point of view. The implications for an improvement of the several settings of the Italian NHS are various, and many are the consequences in the healthcare management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Terapeutica
Clinica Terapeutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Clinica Terapeutica è una rivista di Clinica e Terapia in Medicina e Chirurgia, fondata nel 1951 dal Prof. Mariano Messini (1901-1980), Direttore dell''Istituto di Idrologia Medica dell''Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. La rivista è pubblicata come “periodico bimestrale” dalla Società Editrice Universo, casa editrice fondata nel 1945 dal Comm. Luigi Pellino. La Clinica Terapeutica è indicizzata su MEDLINE, INDEX MEDICUS, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信