复杂病例的术前麻醉和其他团队会议:叙述性回顾。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Antoine Baumann , Dan Benhamou
{"title":"复杂病例的术前麻醉和其他团队会议:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Antoine Baumann ,&nbsp;Dan Benhamou","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The conventional two-step process for surgical procedures – surgical followed by anaesthetic consultation - may not adequately address the needs of complex cases involving high-risk patients or procedures, leading to increased risks of adverse events. Although surgical team meetings (STM) and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) were implemented many years ago, anaesthesia team meetings (ATM) have recently emerged as potential solutions to enhance perioperative management.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We aim to systematically review and summarize the existing literature that reflects the main theoretical approaches, practices, effects, and clinical relevance of preoperative team meetings - with specific consideration to preoperative ATM - in managing difficult cases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a narrative review of the literature (1980–2024) to identify studies focusing on the practice and the impact of preoperative meetings on patient outcomes, compliance with treatment plans, and teamwork quality. We provide here a qualitative synthesis of the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen studies were identified: 11 consider preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM), 2 consider preoperative surgical team meeting (STM), and only one anaesthesia team meeting (ATM).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is currently not enough robust evidence that preoperative team meetings clearly improve hard patient’s outcome parameters. And the place for ATM does not appear to have been studied to date. There is a need for well-designed studies to explore the impact of preoperative ATM on clinical practice improvement, quality of care, and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 5","pages":"Article 101421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative anaesthesia and other team meetings for complex cases: a narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Baumann ,&nbsp;Dan Benhamou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The conventional two-step process for surgical procedures – surgical followed by anaesthetic consultation - may not adequately address the needs of complex cases involving high-risk patients or procedures, leading to increased risks of adverse events. Although surgical team meetings (STM) and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) were implemented many years ago, anaesthesia team meetings (ATM) have recently emerged as potential solutions to enhance perioperative management.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We aim to systematically review and summarize the existing literature that reflects the main theoretical approaches, practices, effects, and clinical relevance of preoperative team meetings - with specific consideration to preoperative ATM - in managing difficult cases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a narrative review of the literature (1980–2024) to identify studies focusing on the practice and the impact of preoperative meetings on patient outcomes, compliance with treatment plans, and teamwork quality. We provide here a qualitative synthesis of the findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen studies were identified: 11 consider preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM), 2 consider preoperative surgical team meeting (STM), and only one anaesthesia team meeting (ATM).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is currently not enough robust evidence that preoperative team meetings clearly improve hard patient’s outcome parameters. And the place for ATM does not appear to have been studied to date. There is a need for well-designed studies to explore the impact of preoperative ATM on clinical practice improvement, quality of care, and patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000791\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外科手术的传统两步流程--先手术后麻醉会诊--可能无法充分满足涉及高风险患者或手术的复杂病例的需求,从而导致不良事件的风险增加。尽管手术团队会议(STM)和多学科团队会议(MDTM)在多年前就已实施,但麻醉团队会议(ATM)近来已成为加强围手术期管理的潜在解决方案。目的:我们旨在系统回顾和总结现有文献,这些文献反映了术前团队会议(特别是术前ATM)在管理疑难病例方面的主要理论方法、实践、效果和临床意义:我们对文献(1980 - 2024 年)进行了叙事性回顾,以确定有关术前会议的实践及其对患者预后、治疗计划依从性和团队合作质量的影响的研究。我们在此对研究结果进行了定性综述:结果:共发现 14 项研究:11 项研究考虑了术前多学科团队会议 (MDTM),2 项研究考虑了术前手术团队会议 (STM),只有一项研究考虑了麻醉团队会议 (ATM):结论:目前还没有足够有力的证据表明术前团队会议能明显改善患者的预后参数。迄今为止,似乎尚未对 ATM 的地位进行过研究。有必要进行精心设计的研究,探讨术前团队会议对临床实践改进、护理质量和患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative anaesthesia and other team meetings for complex cases: a narrative review

Background

The conventional two-step process for surgical procedures – surgical followed by anaesthetic consultation - may not adequately address the needs of complex cases involving high-risk patients or procedures, leading to increased risks of adverse events. Although surgical team meetings (STM) and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) were implemented many years ago, anaesthesia team meetings (ATM) have recently emerged as potential solutions to enhance perioperative management.

Purpose

We aim to systematically review and summarize the existing literature that reflects the main theoretical approaches, practices, effects, and clinical relevance of preoperative team meetings - with specific consideration to preoperative ATM - in managing difficult cases.

Methods

We performed a narrative review of the literature (1980–2024) to identify studies focusing on the practice and the impact of preoperative meetings on patient outcomes, compliance with treatment plans, and teamwork quality. We provide here a qualitative synthesis of the findings.

Results

Fourteen studies were identified: 11 consider preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM), 2 consider preoperative surgical team meeting (STM), and only one anaesthesia team meeting (ATM).

Conclusions

There is currently not enough robust evidence that preoperative team meetings clearly improve hard patient’s outcome parameters. And the place for ATM does not appear to have been studied to date. There is a need for well-designed studies to explore the impact of preoperative ATM on clinical practice improvement, quality of care, and patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信