Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana , Ana Belén Guisado-Gil , Bernardo Santos-Ramos , Ana Herranz
{"title":"[西班牙医院药房服务研究活动评估仪表板模型的开发与共识。","authors":"Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana , Ana Belén Guisado-Gil , Bernardo Santos-Ramos , Ana Herranz","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop by consensus a dashboard model to standardise and promote the evaluation of research activity in Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was carried out in 5 phases following the modified Delphi methodology: constitution of the coordinating group, elaboration of a list of scenarios, selection of participating centres, evaluation of the list of scenarios, and analysis of the results.</p><p>The coordinating group designed a questionnaire with 114 questions. General research questions and different scenarios (indicators) were included to form the dashboard. The Hospital Pharmacy Services with the highest number of publications were identified to participate in the Delphi consultation. Two rounds of consultations were conducted in which the “Need” and/or “Feasibility” of their measurement was evaluated for each of the scenarios, using a numerical scale from 1 (lowest score) to 9 (highest score).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen Hospital Pharmacy Services, belonging to 8 different Autonomous Communities, participated in the Delphi consultation. A total of 100% of them responded to all the questions in the 2 rounds of consultations. It was considered that the Hospital Pharmacy Services should have a research dashboard (Need<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100%) with a basic structure and a common minimum set of data for all them (Need<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5%). The consensus was reached on distinguishing research projects led by the Hospital Pharmacy Services from those led by other groups in which the Hospital Pharmacy Services collaborate (Need<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5%), and a definition was approved on the leadership of these projects according to whether they are single-centre or multicentre.</p><p>A consensus was reached on 40 indicators to form the dashboard, which evaluates publications (13 indicators), human resources (12 indicators), research projects (9 indicators), doctoral theses (4 indicators), and patents and intellectual property registrations (2 indicators).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first consensus dashboard developed to evaluate the research activity of the Hospital Pharmacy Services, which will help to analyse the productivity and impact of research systematically and continuously. In addition, it will allow comparison between them and will help to establish synergies and identify trends, patterns, and challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324000424/pdfft?md5=f7bde704a578a928e4cb56521db634ce&pid=1-s2.0-S1130634324000424-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Translated article] Development and consensus of a dashboard model to evaluate research activity in Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services\",\"authors\":\"Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana , Ana Belén Guisado-Gil , Bernardo Santos-Ramos , Ana Herranz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farma.2024.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop by consensus a dashboard model to standardise and promote the evaluation of research activity in Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was carried out in 5 phases following the modified Delphi methodology: constitution of the coordinating group, elaboration of a list of scenarios, selection of participating centres, evaluation of the list of scenarios, and analysis of the results.</p><p>The coordinating group designed a questionnaire with 114 questions. General research questions and different scenarios (indicators) were included to form the dashboard. The Hospital Pharmacy Services with the highest number of publications were identified to participate in the Delphi consultation. Two rounds of consultations were conducted in which the “Need” and/or “Feasibility” of their measurement was evaluated for each of the scenarios, using a numerical scale from 1 (lowest score) to 9 (highest score).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen Hospital Pharmacy Services, belonging to 8 different Autonomous Communities, participated in the Delphi consultation. A total of 100% of them responded to all the questions in the 2 rounds of consultations. It was considered that the Hospital Pharmacy Services should have a research dashboard (Need<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100%) with a basic structure and a common minimum set of data for all them (Need<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5%). The consensus was reached on distinguishing research projects led by the Hospital Pharmacy Services from those led by other groups in which the Hospital Pharmacy Services collaborate (Need<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->87.5%), and a definition was approved on the leadership of these projects according to whether they are single-centre or multicentre.</p><p>A consensus was reached on 40 indicators to form the dashboard, which evaluates publications (13 indicators), human resources (12 indicators), research projects (9 indicators), doctoral theses (4 indicators), and patents and intellectual property registrations (2 indicators).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first consensus dashboard developed to evaluate the research activity of the Hospital Pharmacy Services, which will help to analyse the productivity and impact of research systematically and continuously. In addition, it will allow comparison between them and will help to establish synergies and identify trends, patterns, and challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324000424/pdfft?md5=f7bde704a578a928e4cb56521db634ce&pid=1-s2.0-S1130634324000424-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324000424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634324000424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Translated article] Development and consensus of a dashboard model to evaluate research activity in Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services
Objective
To develop by consensus a dashboard model to standardise and promote the evaluation of research activity in Spanish Hospital Pharmacy Services.
Methods
The study was carried out in 5 phases following the modified Delphi methodology: constitution of the coordinating group, elaboration of a list of scenarios, selection of participating centres, evaluation of the list of scenarios, and analysis of the results.
The coordinating group designed a questionnaire with 114 questions. General research questions and different scenarios (indicators) were included to form the dashboard. The Hospital Pharmacy Services with the highest number of publications were identified to participate in the Delphi consultation. Two rounds of consultations were conducted in which the “Need” and/or “Feasibility” of their measurement was evaluated for each of the scenarios, using a numerical scale from 1 (lowest score) to 9 (highest score).
Results
Sixteen Hospital Pharmacy Services, belonging to 8 different Autonomous Communities, participated in the Delphi consultation. A total of 100% of them responded to all the questions in the 2 rounds of consultations. It was considered that the Hospital Pharmacy Services should have a research dashboard (Need = 100%) with a basic structure and a common minimum set of data for all them (Need = 87.5%). The consensus was reached on distinguishing research projects led by the Hospital Pharmacy Services from those led by other groups in which the Hospital Pharmacy Services collaborate (Need = 87.5%), and a definition was approved on the leadership of these projects according to whether they are single-centre or multicentre.
A consensus was reached on 40 indicators to form the dashboard, which evaluates publications (13 indicators), human resources (12 indicators), research projects (9 indicators), doctoral theses (4 indicators), and patents and intellectual property registrations (2 indicators).
Conclusions
This is the first consensus dashboard developed to evaluate the research activity of the Hospital Pharmacy Services, which will help to analyse the productivity and impact of research systematically and continuously. In addition, it will allow comparison between them and will help to establish synergies and identify trends, patterns, and challenges.
期刊介绍：
Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
