坦帕运动恐怖症量表丹麦语版的翻译和构建有效性研究。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2024-0022
Majbritt Mostrup Pedersen, Tina Birgitte Wisbech Carstensen, Eva Ørnbøl, Per Fink, Torben Jørgensen, Thomas Meinertz Dantoft, Lisbeth Frostholm
{"title":"坦帕运动恐怖症量表丹麦语版的翻译和构建有效性研究。","authors":"Majbritt Mostrup Pedersen, Tina Birgitte Wisbech Carstensen, Eva Ørnbøl, Per Fink, Torben Jørgensen, Thomas Meinertz Dantoft, Lisbeth Frostholm","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the construct validity of the Danish Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The English 17-item scale was translated into Danish adhering to WHO's guidelines. The construct validity of the TSK was examined in a random general population sample of 4,884 18- to 72-year olds with pain within the past 4 weeks. Examination of construct validity adhered to the COSMIN checklist. Structural validity was examined by splitting the sample and conducting exploratory factor analysis on one half and confirmatory factor analysis on the other half. Convergent validity was examined through associations with self-report measures and objective physical performance tests. Reference scores for the TSK were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After translation, all respondents felt confident that they understood the meaning of the items. All but one found the questionnaire acceptable. The exploratory factor analysis suggested that a 1-factor 13-item version without 4 reversed items resulted in the most consistent fit across subgroups of gender, age, and severe pain report. Five different models of the TSK were tested in the confirmatory factor analysis. While none were excellent fits, both one- and two-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11 were acceptable. Two-factor models marginally outperformed one-factor models on goodness of fit. There was no association between TSK scores and muscular fitness or self-reported physical activity. Cardiorespiratory fitness, self-perceived physical fitness, and self-efficacy had weak correlations with TSK scores. Scores showed modest associations with self-report measures of anxiety, illness worry, pain interference, and daily limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on an overall consideration of results, we recommend using the TSK-13 as a one-dimensional construct for both research and clinical purposes pending further examinations of the TSK in clinical samples. TSK scores from the present study can serve as a standard of reference for levels of Kinesiophobia in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and examination of construct validity of the Danish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.\",\"authors\":\"Majbritt Mostrup Pedersen, Tina Birgitte Wisbech Carstensen, Eva Ørnbøl, Per Fink, Torben Jørgensen, Thomas Meinertz Dantoft, Lisbeth Frostholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2024-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the construct validity of the Danish Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The English 17-item scale was translated into Danish adhering to WHO's guidelines. The construct validity of the TSK was examined in a random general population sample of 4,884 18- to 72-year olds with pain within the past 4 weeks. Examination of construct validity adhered to the COSMIN checklist. Structural validity was examined by splitting the sample and conducting exploratory factor analysis on one half and confirmatory factor analysis on the other half. Convergent validity was examined through associations with self-report measures and objective physical performance tests. Reference scores for the TSK were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After translation, all respondents felt confident that they understood the meaning of the items. All but one found the questionnaire acceptable. The exploratory factor analysis suggested that a 1-factor 13-item version without 4 reversed items resulted in the most consistent fit across subgroups of gender, age, and severe pain report. Five different models of the TSK were tested in the confirmatory factor analysis. While none were excellent fits, both one- and two-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11 were acceptable. Two-factor models marginally outperformed one-factor models on goodness of fit. There was no association between TSK scores and muscular fitness or self-reported physical activity. Cardiorespiratory fitness, self-perceived physical fitness, and self-efficacy had weak correlations with TSK scores. Scores showed modest associations with self-report measures of anxiety, illness worry, pain interference, and daily limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on an overall consideration of results, we recommend using the TSK-13 as a one-dimensional construct for both research and clinical purposes pending further examinations of the TSK in clinical samples. TSK scores from the present study can serve as a standard of reference for levels of Kinesiophobia in the general population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2024-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究调查了丹麦运动恐怖症坦帕量表(TSK)的结构效度:方法:根据世界卫生组织的指导方针,将 17 个项目的英语量表翻译成丹麦语。方法:根据世界卫生组织的指导原则,将英语的 17 个项目量表翻译成了丹麦语,并随机抽取了 4884 名在过去 4 周内有疼痛症状的 18 至 72 岁的普通人群作为样本,对 TSK 的结构效度进行了检验。结构效度的检查遵循 COSMIN 检查表。结构效度的检验方法是将样本拆分,对一半样本进行探索性因子分析,对另一半样本进行确认性因子分析。通过与自我报告测量和客观体能测试的关联,对收敛效度进行了检验。计算了 TSK 的参考分数:结果:翻译后,所有受访者都确信他们理解了项目的含义。除一名受访者外,所有受访者都认为问卷可以接受。探索性因素分析表明,在不同性别、年龄和严重疼痛报告的亚组中,13 个项目的单因素版本与 4 个反向项目的拟合度最高。在确认性因子分析中,对 TSK 的五个不同模型进行了测试。虽然没有一个模型的拟合效果非常好,但 TSK-13 和 TSK-11 的单因素和双因素模型都是可以接受的。在拟合优度方面,双因素模型略优于单因素模型。TSK 分数与肌肉健康状况或自我报告的体力活动之间没有关联。心肺功能、自我感觉体能和自我效能与 TSK 分数的相关性较弱。得分与自我报告的焦虑、对疾病的担忧、疼痛干扰和日常限制的测量值有适度的相关性:基于对结果的总体考虑,我们建议将 TSK-13 作为单维结构用于研究和临床目的,以待在临床样本中对 TSK 进行进一步检查。本研究得出的 TSK 分数可以作为普通人群运动恐怖症水平的参考标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation and examination of construct validity of the Danish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.

Objectives: This study investigates the construct validity of the Danish Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK).

Methods: The English 17-item scale was translated into Danish adhering to WHO's guidelines. The construct validity of the TSK was examined in a random general population sample of 4,884 18- to 72-year olds with pain within the past 4 weeks. Examination of construct validity adhered to the COSMIN checklist. Structural validity was examined by splitting the sample and conducting exploratory factor analysis on one half and confirmatory factor analysis on the other half. Convergent validity was examined through associations with self-report measures and objective physical performance tests. Reference scores for the TSK were calculated.

Results: After translation, all respondents felt confident that they understood the meaning of the items. All but one found the questionnaire acceptable. The exploratory factor analysis suggested that a 1-factor 13-item version without 4 reversed items resulted in the most consistent fit across subgroups of gender, age, and severe pain report. Five different models of the TSK were tested in the confirmatory factor analysis. While none were excellent fits, both one- and two-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11 were acceptable. Two-factor models marginally outperformed one-factor models on goodness of fit. There was no association between TSK scores and muscular fitness or self-reported physical activity. Cardiorespiratory fitness, self-perceived physical fitness, and self-efficacy had weak correlations with TSK scores. Scores showed modest associations with self-report measures of anxiety, illness worry, pain interference, and daily limitations.

Conclusions: Based on an overall consideration of results, we recommend using the TSK-13 as a one-dimensional construct for both research and clinical purposes pending further examinations of the TSK in clinical samples. TSK scores from the present study can serve as a standard of reference for levels of Kinesiophobia in the general population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信