针对痴呆症风险因素的人群干预措施的益处:英格兰经济模型研究。

IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Prof Naaheed Mukadam PhD , Robert Anderson MA , Sebastian Walsh MPhil , Raphael Wittenberg MSc , Prof Martin Knapp PhD , Prof Carol Brayne PhD , Prof Gill Livingston MD
{"title":"针对痴呆症风险因素的人群干预措施的益处:英格兰经济模型研究。","authors":"Prof Naaheed Mukadam PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Anderson MA ,&nbsp;Sebastian Walsh MPhil ,&nbsp;Raphael Wittenberg MSc ,&nbsp;Prof Martin Knapp PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Carol Brayne PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Gill Livingston MD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00117-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individual-level interventions for dementia risk factors could reduce costs associated with dementia and some are cost-effective. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-level interventions for tackling dementia risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this economic modelling study, we included recommended population-based interventions from a previously published review article for which there was consistent and robust evidence of effectiveness in tackling a dementia risk factor (tobacco smoking, excess alcohol use, hypertension, obesity, air pollution, and head injury). We only included interventions if they had not been introduced in England or were in place but could be extended. The interventions studied were increases in tobacco pricing, minimum pricing for alcohol, raising alcohol price, salt reduction policies, sugar reduction policies, low emission zones, and compulsory helmet use for cycling by children (aged 5–18 years). We used published intervention effect sizes and relative risks for each risk factor and a Markov model to estimate progression to dementia in populations with and without the intervention, looking at lifetime risk, in the population of England.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We estimated that reductions in excess alcohol use through minimum unit pricing would lead to cost-savings of £280 million and 4767 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained over an indefinite succession of age cohorts. Reformulation of food products to reduce salt would lead to cost-savings of £2·4 billion and 39 433 QALYs gained and reformulation to reduce sugar would lead to cost-savings of £1·046 billion and 17 985 QALYs gained. Reducing dementia risk from air pollution by introducing low emission zones in English cities with a population of 100 000 or more (that do not already impose restrictions) would lead to £260 million cost-savings and 5119 QALYs gained. Raising cigarette prices by 10% to reduce dementia risk from smoking would lead to 2277 QALYs gained and cost-savings of £157 million. Making bicycle helmets compulsory for children (aged 5–18 years) to reduce dementia risk from head injury would lead to cost-savings of £91 million and 1554 QALYs gained.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Population-level interventions could help tackle life course dementia risk and save costs.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Three Schools dementia research programme.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400117X/pdfft?md5=11cf8662075dd2811b0c703f0114287f&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400117X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of population-level interventions for dementia risk factors: an economic modelling study for England\",\"authors\":\"Prof Naaheed Mukadam PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Anderson MA ,&nbsp;Sebastian Walsh MPhil ,&nbsp;Raphael Wittenberg MSc ,&nbsp;Prof Martin Knapp PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Carol Brayne PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Gill Livingston MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2666-7568(24)00117-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individual-level interventions for dementia risk factors could reduce costs associated with dementia and some are cost-effective. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-level interventions for tackling dementia risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this economic modelling study, we included recommended population-based interventions from a previously published review article for which there was consistent and robust evidence of effectiveness in tackling a dementia risk factor (tobacco smoking, excess alcohol use, hypertension, obesity, air pollution, and head injury). We only included interventions if they had not been introduced in England or were in place but could be extended. The interventions studied were increases in tobacco pricing, minimum pricing for alcohol, raising alcohol price, salt reduction policies, sugar reduction policies, low emission zones, and compulsory helmet use for cycling by children (aged 5–18 years). We used published intervention effect sizes and relative risks for each risk factor and a Markov model to estimate progression to dementia in populations with and without the intervention, looking at lifetime risk, in the population of England.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We estimated that reductions in excess alcohol use through minimum unit pricing would lead to cost-savings of £280 million and 4767 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained over an indefinite succession of age cohorts. Reformulation of food products to reduce salt would lead to cost-savings of £2·4 billion and 39 433 QALYs gained and reformulation to reduce sugar would lead to cost-savings of £1·046 billion and 17 985 QALYs gained. Reducing dementia risk from air pollution by introducing low emission zones in English cities with a population of 100 000 or more (that do not already impose restrictions) would lead to £260 million cost-savings and 5119 QALYs gained. Raising cigarette prices by 10% to reduce dementia risk from smoking would lead to 2277 QALYs gained and cost-savings of £157 million. Making bicycle helmets compulsory for children (aged 5–18 years) to reduce dementia risk from head injury would lead to cost-savings of £91 million and 1554 QALYs gained.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Population-level interventions could help tackle life course dementia risk and save costs.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Three Schools dementia research programme.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400117X/pdfft?md5=11cf8662075dd2811b0c703f0114287f&pid=1-s2.0-S266675682400117X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Healthy Longevity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400117X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400117X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对痴呆症风险因素的个人干预措施可降低痴呆症的相关成本,其中一些措施具有成本效益。我们旨在估算针对痴呆症风险因素的人群干预措施的成本效益:在这项经济模型研究中,我们纳入了之前发表的综述文章中推荐的人群干预措施,这些干预措施在应对痴呆症风险因素(吸烟、过量饮酒、高血压、肥胖、空气污染和头部损伤)方面具有一致且可靠的有效性证据。如果干预措施尚未在英格兰实施,或者已经实施但可以推广,我们才将其纳入研究范围。研究的干预措施包括提高烟草定价、酒类最低定价、提高酒类价格、减盐政策、减糖政策、低排放区以及儿童(5-18 岁)骑自行车必须戴头盔。我们使用已公布的干预效果大小和每个风险因素的相对风险,并使用马尔可夫模型来估算英格兰人口在采取干预措施和未采取干预措施的情况下痴呆症的进展情况,以终生风险为依据:我们估计,通过最低单位定价减少过量饮酒可节约成本 2.8 亿英镑,并在不确定的连续年龄组中获得 4767 个质量调整生命年(QALYs)。重新配制食品以减少盐分,可节约成本 20-4 亿英镑,获得 39 433 个质量调整生命年;重新配制食品以减少糖分,可节约成本 10-46 亿英镑,获得 17 985 个质量调整生命年。在人口达到或超过 10 万的英国城市(尚未实施限制措施)设立低排放区,降低空气污染对痴呆症造成的风险,可节约成本 2.6 亿英镑,获得 5119 QALYs。将香烟价格提高 10%,以降低吸烟导致痴呆症的风险,将带来 2277 QALYs 收益和 1.57 亿英镑的成本节约。强制规定儿童(5-18 岁)必须佩戴自行车头盔,以降低因头部受伤导致痴呆症的风险,可节约成本 9100 万英镑,获得 1554 个 QALYs:人口层面的干预措施有助于应对终生痴呆症风险并节约成本:资金来源:英国国家健康与护理研究所 "三校痴呆症研究计划"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of population-level interventions for dementia risk factors: an economic modelling study for England

Background

Individual-level interventions for dementia risk factors could reduce costs associated with dementia and some are cost-effective. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of population-level interventions for tackling dementia risk factors.

Methods

In this economic modelling study, we included recommended population-based interventions from a previously published review article for which there was consistent and robust evidence of effectiveness in tackling a dementia risk factor (tobacco smoking, excess alcohol use, hypertension, obesity, air pollution, and head injury). We only included interventions if they had not been introduced in England or were in place but could be extended. The interventions studied were increases in tobacco pricing, minimum pricing for alcohol, raising alcohol price, salt reduction policies, sugar reduction policies, low emission zones, and compulsory helmet use for cycling by children (aged 5–18 years). We used published intervention effect sizes and relative risks for each risk factor and a Markov model to estimate progression to dementia in populations with and without the intervention, looking at lifetime risk, in the population of England.

Findings

We estimated that reductions in excess alcohol use through minimum unit pricing would lead to cost-savings of £280 million and 4767 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained over an indefinite succession of age cohorts. Reformulation of food products to reduce salt would lead to cost-savings of £2·4 billion and 39 433 QALYs gained and reformulation to reduce sugar would lead to cost-savings of £1·046 billion and 17 985 QALYs gained. Reducing dementia risk from air pollution by introducing low emission zones in English cities with a population of 100 000 or more (that do not already impose restrictions) would lead to £260 million cost-savings and 5119 QALYs gained. Raising cigarette prices by 10% to reduce dementia risk from smoking would lead to 2277 QALYs gained and cost-savings of £157 million. Making bicycle helmets compulsory for children (aged 5–18 years) to reduce dementia risk from head injury would lead to cost-savings of £91 million and 1554 QALYs gained.

Interpretation

Population-level interventions could help tackle life course dementia risk and save costs.

Funding

UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Three Schools dementia research programme.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
Lancet Healthy Longevity GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
192
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信