在经验丰富的佛教冥想者中,用WAKE-16测量的觉醒度提高与正念和情绪自我调节有关。

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience
Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.04.005
Christine Flatten, Damisela Linares Gutiérrez, Sebastian L Kübel, Steve Taylor, Marc Wittmann
{"title":"在经验丰富的佛教冥想者中,用WAKE-16测量的觉醒度提高与正念和情绪自我调节有关。","authors":"Christine Flatten, Damisela Linares Gutiérrez, Sebastian L Kübel, Steve Taylor, Marc Wittmann","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We tested and validated the German version of a new instrument for measuring \"wakefulness,\" defined as \"an expansive, higher-functioning, and stable state of being in which a person's vision of and relationship to the world are transformed, along with their subjective experience, their sense of identity and their conceptual outlook\" (Taylor, 2017, p. 22).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to test the construct validity of the new instrument (Inventory of Secular/Spiritual Wakefulness; WAKE-16), we performed a parametric comparison between a group of expert meditators (n=36) with a history of predominantly meditating in silence and demographically matched non-meditators (n=36) for the WAKE-16 and two conceptually related questionnaires of mindfulness and emotion regulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher scores for the meditators on the WAKE-16 indicate construct validity of the new instrument. Meditators scored higher on the two mindfulness subscales \"presence\" and \"acceptance,\" as well as on the SEE subscales of emotion regulation and body-related symbolization of emotions. Within the group of meditators, there were significant correlations between wakefulness and mindfulness, accepting one's own emotions, and experiencing overwhelming emotions. The only significant correlation in non-meditators was found between wakefulness and accepting one's own emotions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The new instrument shows construct validity by discriminating between the two groups. Correlations between wakefulness and related psychological constructs indicate convergent validity. Future studies could attempt to increase discriminatory accuracy of the definition of wakefulness, as well as finding objective methods of measuring.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"287 ","pages":"287-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increased wakefulness as measured by the WAKE-16 is related to mindfulness and emotional self-regulation in experienced Buddhist meditators.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Flatten, Damisela Linares Gutiérrez, Sebastian L Kübel, Steve Taylor, Marc Wittmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We tested and validated the German version of a new instrument for measuring \\\"wakefulness,\\\" defined as \\\"an expansive, higher-functioning, and stable state of being in which a person's vision of and relationship to the world are transformed, along with their subjective experience, their sense of identity and their conceptual outlook\\\" (Taylor, 2017, p. 22).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to test the construct validity of the new instrument (Inventory of Secular/Spiritual Wakefulness; WAKE-16), we performed a parametric comparison between a group of expert meditators (n=36) with a history of predominantly meditating in silence and demographically matched non-meditators (n=36) for the WAKE-16 and two conceptually related questionnaires of mindfulness and emotion regulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher scores for the meditators on the WAKE-16 indicate construct validity of the new instrument. Meditators scored higher on the two mindfulness subscales \\\"presence\\\" and \\\"acceptance,\\\" as well as on the SEE subscales of emotion regulation and body-related symbolization of emotions. Within the group of meditators, there were significant correlations between wakefulness and mindfulness, accepting one's own emotions, and experiencing overwhelming emotions. The only significant correlation in non-meditators was found between wakefulness and accepting one's own emotions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The new instrument shows construct validity by discriminating between the two groups. Correlations between wakefulness and related psychological constructs indicate convergent validity. Future studies could attempt to increase discriminatory accuracy of the definition of wakefulness, as well as finding objective methods of measuring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in brain research\",\"volume\":\"287 \",\"pages\":\"287-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in brain research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.04.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.04.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介唤醒 "被定义为 "一种广阔的、功能更强的和稳定的存在状态,在这种状态下,一个人对世界的看法和与世界的关系,以及他们的主观体验、身份感和概念观都发生了转变"(Taylor,2017,第22页):为了检验新工具(世俗/精神觉醒量表;WAKE-16)的建构效度,我们对一组主要在静默中冥想的专家级冥想者(36 人)与人口统计学上相匹配的非冥想者(36 人)进行了WAKE-16 和两个概念相关的正念和情绪调节问卷的参数比较:冥想者在 WAKE-16 中的得分显著高于非冥想者,这表明新工具具有建构有效性。冥想者在 "存在 "和 "接受 "这两个正念子量表以及情绪调节和情绪的身体相关象征化这两个 SEE 子量表上的得分都较高。在冥想者群体中,觉醒与正念、接受自己的情绪和体验难以承受的情绪之间存在显著的相关性。在非冥想者中,觉醒与接受自身情绪之间存在唯一的显着相关性:讨论:新工具通过区分两组人显示出了建构有效性。讨论:新工具通过区分两组人显示出了建构效度,觉醒与相关心理建构之间的相关性显示出了趋同效度。今后的研究可以尝试提高觉醒定义的区分准确性,并找到客观的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increased wakefulness as measured by the WAKE-16 is related to mindfulness and emotional self-regulation in experienced Buddhist meditators.

Introduction: We tested and validated the German version of a new instrument for measuring "wakefulness," defined as "an expansive, higher-functioning, and stable state of being in which a person's vision of and relationship to the world are transformed, along with their subjective experience, their sense of identity and their conceptual outlook" (Taylor, 2017, p. 22).

Methods: In order to test the construct validity of the new instrument (Inventory of Secular/Spiritual Wakefulness; WAKE-16), we performed a parametric comparison between a group of expert meditators (n=36) with a history of predominantly meditating in silence and demographically matched non-meditators (n=36) for the WAKE-16 and two conceptually related questionnaires of mindfulness and emotion regulation.

Results: Significantly higher scores for the meditators on the WAKE-16 indicate construct validity of the new instrument. Meditators scored higher on the two mindfulness subscales "presence" and "acceptance," as well as on the SEE subscales of emotion regulation and body-related symbolization of emotions. Within the group of meditators, there were significant correlations between wakefulness and mindfulness, accepting one's own emotions, and experiencing overwhelming emotions. The only significant correlation in non-meditators was found between wakefulness and accepting one's own emotions.

Discussion: The new instrument shows construct validity by discriminating between the two groups. Correlations between wakefulness and related psychological constructs indicate convergent validity. Future studies could attempt to increase discriminatory accuracy of the definition of wakefulness, as well as finding objective methods of measuring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信