2021-2022 年哥伦比亚四个城市 CoronaVac 疫苗的实际效果。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Carlos Alberto Reina-Bolaños , María Patricia Arbeláez-Montoya , Hugo Brango , Delia Ortega , Catalina Tovar-Acero , Liliana López-Carvajal , Doracelly Hincapié-Palacio , Ana Maritza Agudelo-Vacca , Germán Avila-Rodriguez , Paula A Avilés-Vergara , Ingrid Liliana Minotta-Díaz , David Arango-Londoño , Geraldine Quintero-Mona , Melanie Sánchez-Orozco , Laura Daniela Espinoza-Maca , Pablo Roa , Juan Carlos Alzate-Ángel , Anthony Garcés-Hurtado , Sebastián Reina , Alberto Concha-Eastman
{"title":"2021-2022 年哥伦比亚四个城市 CoronaVac 疫苗的实际效果。","authors":"Carlos Alberto Reina-Bolaños ,&nbsp;María Patricia Arbeláez-Montoya ,&nbsp;Hugo Brango ,&nbsp;Delia Ortega ,&nbsp;Catalina Tovar-Acero ,&nbsp;Liliana López-Carvajal ,&nbsp;Doracelly Hincapié-Palacio ,&nbsp;Ana Maritza Agudelo-Vacca ,&nbsp;Germán Avila-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Paula A Avilés-Vergara ,&nbsp;Ingrid Liliana Minotta-Díaz ,&nbsp;David Arango-Londoño ,&nbsp;Geraldine Quintero-Mona ,&nbsp;Melanie Sánchez-Orozco ,&nbsp;Laura Daniela Espinoza-Maca ,&nbsp;Pablo Roa ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Alzate-Ángel ,&nbsp;Anthony Garcés-Hurtado ,&nbsp;Sebastián Reina ,&nbsp;Alberto Concha-Eastman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The National Vaccination Plan against SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 was launched by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection on 14 February 2021. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the CoronaVac in preventing the three clinical outcomes of infection, hospitalisation, or death, in a real-world scenario.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was a population-based retrospective dynamic cohort study using a multivariate Cox model to calculate hazard ratios to estimate vaccine effectiveness from 17 February 2021 to 30 June 2022. The data were collected from surveillance systems for 12 months for each individual. Four cities were selected on the basis of the reliability of their data bases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rates of CoronaVac effectiveness were 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31-33) for preventing infection, 55% (95% CI 54-56) for hospitalisation, and 90% (95% CI 89-90) for death, at the end of follow-up. These findings were more consistent during the first 4 months. Compared with the unvaccinated group, homologous booster doses appeared to increase effectiveness in preventing hospitalisation, whereas heterologous booster doses increased protection for both hospitalisation and death. Booster doses did not improve effectiveness among those already vaccinated with CoronaVac, even when they received heterologous boosters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CoronaVac demonstrated effectiveness in preventing death and hospitalisation during the first year of follow-up, but its effectiveness in preventing infection was lower, decreasing rapidly after the first 4 months of follow-up. The effectiveness was higher among children aged between 3 and 12 years, and among adults aged ≥60 years. Booster doses did not improve effectiveness among those already vaccinated with CoronaVac.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224002273/pdfft?md5=7d5b93e0168b3efe044ef1d4f2c9eb25&pid=1-s2.0-S1201971224002273-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine in a retrospective population-based cohort in four Colombian cities (2021-2022)\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Alberto Reina-Bolaños ,&nbsp;María Patricia Arbeláez-Montoya ,&nbsp;Hugo Brango ,&nbsp;Delia Ortega ,&nbsp;Catalina Tovar-Acero ,&nbsp;Liliana López-Carvajal ,&nbsp;Doracelly Hincapié-Palacio ,&nbsp;Ana Maritza Agudelo-Vacca ,&nbsp;Germán Avila-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Paula A Avilés-Vergara ,&nbsp;Ingrid Liliana Minotta-Díaz ,&nbsp;David Arango-Londoño ,&nbsp;Geraldine Quintero-Mona ,&nbsp;Melanie Sánchez-Orozco ,&nbsp;Laura Daniela Espinoza-Maca ,&nbsp;Pablo Roa ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Alzate-Ángel ,&nbsp;Anthony Garcés-Hurtado ,&nbsp;Sebastián Reina ,&nbsp;Alberto Concha-Eastman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijid.2024.107156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The National Vaccination Plan against SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 was launched by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection on 14 February 2021. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the CoronaVac in preventing the three clinical outcomes of infection, hospitalisation, or death, in a real-world scenario.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was a population-based retrospective dynamic cohort study using a multivariate Cox model to calculate hazard ratios to estimate vaccine effectiveness from 17 February 2021 to 30 June 2022. The data were collected from surveillance systems for 12 months for each individual. Four cities were selected on the basis of the reliability of their data bases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The rates of CoronaVac effectiveness were 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31-33) for preventing infection, 55% (95% CI 54-56) for hospitalisation, and 90% (95% CI 89-90) for death, at the end of follow-up. These findings were more consistent during the first 4 months. Compared with the unvaccinated group, homologous booster doses appeared to increase effectiveness in preventing hospitalisation, whereas heterologous booster doses increased protection for both hospitalisation and death. Booster doses did not improve effectiveness among those already vaccinated with CoronaVac, even when they received heterologous boosters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CoronaVac demonstrated effectiveness in preventing death and hospitalisation during the first year of follow-up, but its effectiveness in preventing infection was lower, decreasing rapidly after the first 4 months of follow-up. The effectiveness was higher among children aged between 3 and 12 years, and among adults aged ≥60 years. Booster doses did not improve effectiveness among those already vaccinated with CoronaVac.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224002273/pdfft?md5=7d5b93e0168b3efe044ef1d4f2c9eb25&pid=1-s2.0-S1201971224002273-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224002273\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224002273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:卫生和社会保护部于 2021 年 2 月 14 日启动了国家 SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 疫苗接种计划。研究的主要目的是评估科罗娜疫苗在真实世界中预防感染、住院或死亡三种临床结果的有效性:这是一项基于人群的回顾性动态队列研究,采用多变量考克斯模型计算危险比 (HR),以估计疫苗的有效性,研究时间从 2021 年 2 月 17 日开始,至 2022 年 6 月 30 日结束。数据来自每个人 12 个月的监测系统。考虑到每个城市都有可靠的数据基础,因此选择了四个城市:在随访结束时,科罗娜真空预防感染的有效性估计为 32%(95%CI 31-33),预防住院的有效性估计为 55%(95%CI 54-56),预防死亡的有效性估计为 90%(95%CI 89-90)。这些结果在最初的四个月中更为一致。与未接种疫苗者相比,同种强化剂似乎更有效地预防了住院,但异种强化剂则增加了对住院和死亡的保护。已经接种过科罗娜疫苗的人在接受异源加强剂时,加强剂的效果也没有提高:科罗娜疫苗在第一年的随访中对预防死亡或住院有一定效果,但在预防感染方面效果较差,随访头四个月后效果迅速下降。3至12岁的儿童以及60岁以上的老人的有效性更高。对于已经接种过 CoronaVac 疫苗的人来说,加强剂量并未提高有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine in a retrospective population-based cohort in four Colombian cities (2021-2022)

Objectives

The National Vaccination Plan against SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 was launched by the Ministry of Health and Social Protection on 14 February 2021. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the CoronaVac in preventing the three clinical outcomes of infection, hospitalisation, or death, in a real-world scenario.

Design

This was a population-based retrospective dynamic cohort study using a multivariate Cox model to calculate hazard ratios to estimate vaccine effectiveness from 17 February 2021 to 30 June 2022. The data were collected from surveillance systems for 12 months for each individual. Four cities were selected on the basis of the reliability of their data bases.

Results

The rates of CoronaVac effectiveness were 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31-33) for preventing infection, 55% (95% CI 54-56) for hospitalisation, and 90% (95% CI 89-90) for death, at the end of follow-up. These findings were more consistent during the first 4 months. Compared with the unvaccinated group, homologous booster doses appeared to increase effectiveness in preventing hospitalisation, whereas heterologous booster doses increased protection for both hospitalisation and death. Booster doses did not improve effectiveness among those already vaccinated with CoronaVac, even when they received heterologous boosters.

Conclusions

CoronaVac demonstrated effectiveness in preventing death and hospitalisation during the first year of follow-up, but its effectiveness in preventing infection was lower, decreasing rapidly after the first 4 months of follow-up. The effectiveness was higher among children aged between 3 and 12 years, and among adults aged ≥60 years. Booster doses did not improve effectiveness among those already vaccinated with CoronaVac.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信