50-59岁成人与≥60岁成人相比,呼吸道合胞病毒预融合F蛋白疫苗的免疫原性和安全性均无差别。

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Murdo Ferguson, Tino F Schwarz, Sebastián A Núñez, Juan Rodríguez-García, Marek Mital, Carlos Zala, Bernhard Schmitt, Nicole Toursarkissian, Dolores Ochoa Mazarro, Josef Großkopf, Christine Voors-Pette, Hemalini Mehta, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Magali de Heusch, Bruno Salaun, Silvia Damaso, Marie-Pierre David, Dominique Descamps, Judith Hill, Corinne Vandermeulen, Veronica Hulstrøm
{"title":"50-59岁成人与≥60岁成人相比,呼吸道合胞病毒预融合F蛋白疫苗的免疫原性和安全性均无差别。","authors":"Murdo Ferguson, Tino F Schwarz, Sebastián A Núñez, Juan Rodríguez-García, Marek Mital, Carlos Zala, Bernhard Schmitt, Nicole Toursarkissian, Dolores Ochoa Mazarro, Josef Großkopf, Christine Voors-Pette, Hemalini Mehta, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Magali de Heusch, Bruno Salaun, Silvia Damaso, Marie-Pierre David, Dominique Descamps, Judith Hill, Corinne Vandermeulen, Veronica Hulstrøm","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) is approved in adults aged ≥60 years. We evaluated RSVPreF3 OA immunogenicity and safety in adults aged 50-59 years without or with increased risk for RSV disease due to specific chronic medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observer-blind, phase 3, noninferiority trial included adults aged 50-59 years, stratified into 2 subcohorts: those with and those without predefined, stable, chronic medical conditions leading to an increased risk for RSV disease. Participants in both subcohorts were randomized 2:1 to receive RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. A control group of adults aged ≥60 years received RSVPreF3 OA. Primary outcomes were RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers (geometric mean titer ratios and sero-response rate differences) 1 month post-vaccination in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds. Cell-mediated immunity and safety were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exposed population included 1152 participants aged 50-59 years and 381 participants aged ≥60 years. RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds; noninferiority criteria were met for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers in those with and those without increased risk for RSV disease. Frequencies of RSVPreF3-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells increased substantially from pre- to 1 month post-vaccination. Most solicited adverse events had mild-to-moderate intensity and were transient. Unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were similar in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds compared to ≥60-year-olds, in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated. The safety profile in 50-59-year-olds was consistent with that in ≥60-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05590403.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninferior Immunogenicity and Consistent Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Adults 50-59 Years Compared to ≥60 Years of Age.\",\"authors\":\"Murdo Ferguson, Tino F Schwarz, Sebastián A Núñez, Juan Rodríguez-García, Marek Mital, Carlos Zala, Bernhard Schmitt, Nicole Toursarkissian, Dolores Ochoa Mazarro, Josef Großkopf, Christine Voors-Pette, Hemalini Mehta, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Magali de Heusch, Bruno Salaun, Silvia Damaso, Marie-Pierre David, Dominique Descamps, Judith Hill, Corinne Vandermeulen, Veronica Hulstrøm\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciae364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) is approved in adults aged ≥60 years. We evaluated RSVPreF3 OA immunogenicity and safety in adults aged 50-59 years without or with increased risk for RSV disease due to specific chronic medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observer-blind, phase 3, noninferiority trial included adults aged 50-59 years, stratified into 2 subcohorts: those with and those without predefined, stable, chronic medical conditions leading to an increased risk for RSV disease. Participants in both subcohorts were randomized 2:1 to receive RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. A control group of adults aged ≥60 years received RSVPreF3 OA. Primary outcomes were RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers (geometric mean titer ratios and sero-response rate differences) 1 month post-vaccination in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds. Cell-mediated immunity and safety were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exposed population included 1152 participants aged 50-59 years and 381 participants aged ≥60 years. RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds; noninferiority criteria were met for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers in those with and those without increased risk for RSV disease. Frequencies of RSVPreF3-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells increased substantially from pre- to 1 month post-vaccination. Most solicited adverse events had mild-to-moderate intensity and were transient. Unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were similar in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds compared to ≥60-year-olds, in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated. The safety profile in 50-59-year-olds was consistent with that in ≥60-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05590403.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478578/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae364\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于佐剂的呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)前驱F蛋白疫苗(RSVPreF3 OA)已被批准用于年龄≥60岁的成年人。我们评估了 RSVPreF3 OA 在 50-59 岁成人中的免疫原性和安全性,这些成人没有或因特定慢性疾病而增加了患 RSV 疾病的风险:这项观察盲法 3 期非劣效性试验纳入了 50-59 岁的成年人,并将其分为 2 个亚组:患有和未患有导致 RSV 患病风险增加的预定义、稳定的慢性疾病的人。两个亚群的参与者按 2:1 的比例随机接受 RSVPreF3 OA 或安慰剂。年龄≥60 岁的成人对照组接受 RSVPreF3 OA。主要结果是 50-59 岁人群与≥60 岁人群接种后 1 个月的 RSV-A 和 RSV-B 中和滴度(几何平均滴度比和血清反应率差异)。此外,还对细胞介导免疫和安全性进行了评估:暴露人群包括 1152 名 50-59 岁的参与者和 381 名≥60 岁的参与者。RSVPreF3 OA在50-59岁人群和≥60岁人群中的免疫效果不相上下;RSV-A和RSV-B中和滴度在有RSV疾病风险和无RSV疾病风险增加的人群中均达到不相上下的标准。从接种前到接种后一个月,RSVPreF3特异性多功能CD4+ T细胞的数量大幅增加。大多数主动引起的不良反应强度为轻度至中度,并且是一过性的。各组的非主动不良反应和严重不良反应发生率相似:结论:RSVPreF3 OA在50-59岁人群中的免疫效果不劣于≥60岁人群。50-59岁人群的安全性与≥60岁人群一致:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05590403。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninferior Immunogenicity and Consistent Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Adults 50-59 Years Compared to ≥60 Years of Age.

Background: The adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) is approved in adults aged ≥60 years. We evaluated RSVPreF3 OA immunogenicity and safety in adults aged 50-59 years without or with increased risk for RSV disease due to specific chronic medical conditions.

Methods: This observer-blind, phase 3, noninferiority trial included adults aged 50-59 years, stratified into 2 subcohorts: those with and those without predefined, stable, chronic medical conditions leading to an increased risk for RSV disease. Participants in both subcohorts were randomized 2:1 to receive RSVPreF3 OA or placebo. A control group of adults aged ≥60 years received RSVPreF3 OA. Primary outcomes were RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers (geometric mean titer ratios and sero-response rate differences) 1 month post-vaccination in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds. Cell-mediated immunity and safety were also assessed.

Results: The exposed population included 1152 participants aged 50-59 years and 381 participants aged ≥60 years. RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds versus ≥60-year-olds; noninferiority criteria were met for RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers in those with and those without increased risk for RSV disease. Frequencies of RSVPreF3-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T cells increased substantially from pre- to 1 month post-vaccination. Most solicited adverse events had mild-to-moderate intensity and were transient. Unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were similar in all groups.

Conclusions: RSVPreF3 OA was immunologically noninferior in 50-59-year-olds compared to ≥60-year-olds, in whom efficacy was previously demonstrated. The safety profile in 50-59-year-olds was consistent with that in ≥60-year-olds.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05590403.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信