评估验光学生的技术自我效能感和远程保健接受度。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Optometry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-04 DOI:10.1080/08164622.2024.2380080
Jia Jia Lek, Kwang Meng Cham, Mark Merolli
{"title":"评估验光学生的技术自我效能感和远程保健接受度。","authors":"Jia Jia Lek, Kwang Meng Cham, Mark Merolli","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2024.2380080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Constant technological improvements require practitioners to be open to adopting technologies such as telehealth for enhanced patient care. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of telehealth adoption will guide stakeholders in making decisions for safe and effective implementation of telehealth.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective use of telehealth improves patient outcomes. It is unclear if optometry students feel supported in using and/or are accepting of telehealth. This study evaluated telehealth acceptance of optometry students, its association with their technology self-efficacy, and whether telehealth training alters this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Final-year optometry students at the University of Melbourne were invited to participate in a telehealth course. A 22-item online survey adapted from the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment for twenty-first Century Learning was used to evaluate technology self-efficacy pre- and post-learning. Telehealth acceptance was evaluated using a 34-item survey according to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology-2. A 5-point Likert scale was used for each item, yielding two total scores. Respondent demographics, frequency of usage and number of devices were recorded. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA and Pearson correlation were used to analyse demographic variables and relationship between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 (68%) and 49 (58%) students participated in the pre- and post-learning surveys. Majority were 20-29-year-old females. Students used between two and four devices for online activities, with 62% being online at least hourly. Technology self-efficacy scores (average ± SD) pre- and post-learning were 83.8% ± 8.2 and 87.8% ± 7.1. Telehealth acceptance scores pre- and post-learning were 66.1% ± 9.6 and 73.98% ± 9.9. There was no association with gender, number of devices and frequency of online use for all scores. Correlation between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance was insignificant pre-learning (<i>p</i> = 0.3) but was significant post-learning (<i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optometry students demonstrated high technology self-efficacy compared to telehealth acceptance. Telehealth training resulted in marked improvement in telehealth acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"368-379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating perceived technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance in optometry students.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Jia Lek, Kwang Meng Cham, Mark Merolli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08164622.2024.2380080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Constant technological improvements require practitioners to be open to adopting technologies such as telehealth for enhanced patient care. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of telehealth adoption will guide stakeholders in making decisions for safe and effective implementation of telehealth.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective use of telehealth improves patient outcomes. It is unclear if optometry students feel supported in using and/or are accepting of telehealth. This study evaluated telehealth acceptance of optometry students, its association with their technology self-efficacy, and whether telehealth training alters this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Final-year optometry students at the University of Melbourne were invited to participate in a telehealth course. A 22-item online survey adapted from the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment for twenty-first Century Learning was used to evaluate technology self-efficacy pre- and post-learning. Telehealth acceptance was evaluated using a 34-item survey according to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology-2. A 5-point Likert scale was used for each item, yielding two total scores. Respondent demographics, frequency of usage and number of devices were recorded. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA and Pearson correlation were used to analyse demographic variables and relationship between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 (68%) and 49 (58%) students participated in the pre- and post-learning surveys. Majority were 20-29-year-old females. Students used between two and four devices for online activities, with 62% being online at least hourly. Technology self-efficacy scores (average ± SD) pre- and post-learning were 83.8% ± 8.2 and 87.8% ± 7.1. Telehealth acceptance scores pre- and post-learning were 66.1% ± 9.6 and 73.98% ± 9.9. There was no association with gender, number of devices and frequency of online use for all scores. Correlation between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance was insignificant pre-learning (<i>p</i> = 0.3) but was significant post-learning (<i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optometry students demonstrated high technology self-efficacy compared to telehealth acceptance. Telehealth training resulted in marked improvement in telehealth acceptance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"368-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2380080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2380080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床相关性:技术的不断进步要求从业人员对采用远程医疗等技术加强患者护理持开放态度。了解采用远程医疗的障碍和促进因素将为利益相关者做出安全有效地实施远程医疗的决策提供指导:背景:有效使用远程保健可改善患者的治疗效果。目前还不清楚验光学生在使用和/或接受远程保健方面是否感到受到支持。本研究评估了验光学生对远程保健的接受程度、与他们的技术自我效能的关系,以及远程保健培训是否会改变这种关系:方法:邀请墨尔本大学验光配镜专业的毕业班学生参加远程保健课程。该调查改编自 "21 世纪学习技术能力自我评估",共 22 个项目,用于评估学习前和学习后的技术自我效能感。根据 "技术接受和使用统一理论-2"(Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology-2),使用 34 个项目的调查表对远程保健接受度进行了评估。每个项目均采用 5 分李克特量表,得出两个总分。调查还记录了受访者的人口统计数据、使用频率和设备数量。使用描述性统计、方差分析和皮尔逊相关分析了人口统计学变量以及技术自我效能感与远程保健接受度之间的关系:58(68%)和 49(58%)名学生参加了学习前和学习后的调查。大多数是 20-29 岁的女性。学生使用两到四种设备进行在线活动,62%的学生至少每小时上网一次。学习前后的技术自我效能得分(平均值±标准差)分别为 83.8% ± 8.2 和 87.8% ± 7.1。学习前后的远程保健接受度得分分别为 66.1% ± 9.6 和 73.98% ± 9.9。所有得分均与性别、设备数量和在线使用频率无关。技术自我效能感与远程保健接受度之间的相关性在学习前不显著(p = 0.3),但在学习后显著(p = 0.04):结论:与远程保健接受度相比,验光学生表现出较高的技术自我效能感。远程保健培训显著提高了学生对远程保健的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating perceived technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance in optometry students.

Clinical relevance: Constant technological improvements require practitioners to be open to adopting technologies such as telehealth for enhanced patient care. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of telehealth adoption will guide stakeholders in making decisions for safe and effective implementation of telehealth.

Background: Effective use of telehealth improves patient outcomes. It is unclear if optometry students feel supported in using and/or are accepting of telehealth. This study evaluated telehealth acceptance of optometry students, its association with their technology self-efficacy, and whether telehealth training alters this relationship.

Methods: Final-year optometry students at the University of Melbourne were invited to participate in a telehealth course. A 22-item online survey adapted from the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment for twenty-first Century Learning was used to evaluate technology self-efficacy pre- and post-learning. Telehealth acceptance was evaluated using a 34-item survey according to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology-2. A 5-point Likert scale was used for each item, yielding two total scores. Respondent demographics, frequency of usage and number of devices were recorded. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA and Pearson correlation were used to analyse demographic variables and relationship between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance.

Results: 58 (68%) and 49 (58%) students participated in the pre- and post-learning surveys. Majority were 20-29-year-old females. Students used between two and four devices for online activities, with 62% being online at least hourly. Technology self-efficacy scores (average ± SD) pre- and post-learning were 83.8% ± 8.2 and 87.8% ± 7.1. Telehealth acceptance scores pre- and post-learning were 66.1% ± 9.6 and 73.98% ± 9.9. There was no association with gender, number of devices and frequency of online use for all scores. Correlation between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance was insignificant pre-learning (p = 0.3) but was significant post-learning (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Optometry students demonstrated high technology self-efficacy compared to telehealth acceptance. Telehealth training resulted in marked improvement in telehealth acceptance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信