Follicular neoplasms with nuclear atypia versus other types of atypia: Should follicular neoplasms be stratified according to the presence of nuclear atypia?

Background

The third edition of The Bethesda System (TBS) subclassifies the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category on the basis of the presence of nuclear atypia (AUS-Nuclear). This approach is supported by studies showing significant differences in the risk of malignancy (ROM) between AUS-Nuclear and those without (AUS-Other). Although aspirates of follicular neoplasms (FNs) are characterized by marked architectural atypia, TBS recognizes the infrequent occurrence of FNs with mild nuclear atypia (FN-Nuclear). Furthermore, limited studies have shown significant differences in ROM between FN-Nuclear and those without (FN-Other). This study explored potential differences in ROM, molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM), and molecular alterations between FN-Nuclear and FN-Other.

Methods

A retrospective database search identified 93 FN aspirates. Cytology slides, molecular reports, and histologic follow-ups were reviewed. Both groups' benign call rate (BCR), positive call rate (PCR), MDROM, and ROM were computed and compared.

Results

Eighty-six percent of aspirates (80 of 93) comprised FN-Other, whereas 14% (13 of 93) were FN-Nuclear. The BCR and PCR for FN-Other were 51% and 49%, respectively. In contrast, they were 23% and 77% for FN-Nuclear, respectively. The MDROM significantly differed between FN-Other (30%) and FN-Nuclear (56%) (p < .05). HRAS mutation was the most common molecular alteration in FN-Nuclear, whereas mutations in NRAS/KRAS and copy number alterations were more common in FN-Other. The ROM1/ROM2 in FN-Other and FN-Nuclear were 16%/31% and 54%/88%, respectively.

Conclusions

These results reveal that FN-Nuclear exhibits significantly higher MDROM and ROM than FN-Other, which provides support for a subclassification scheme for FNs based on the presence of nuclear atypia.