Zhiyuan Wu, Lili Hou, Cheng Li, Xiaohua Li, Ying Li
{"title":"乳腺癌切除术后低分次照射与传统照射:急性皮肤毒性比较。","authors":"Zhiyuan Wu, Lili Hou, Cheng Li, Xiaohua Li, Ying Li","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S471901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation (<i>P</i> = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes (<i>P</i> = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) (<i>P <</i> 0.001), and tumor bed planning target volume (PTV-TB) (<i>P</i> = 0.002) were significantly correlated with higher rates of acute skin toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hypofractionated WBI demonstrated similar acute skin adverse reactions compared to conventional WBI. These findings indicate that hypofractionated radiotherapy offers comparable tolerance, equivalent curative effect, convenience, and economic benefits, supporting its clinical promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"16 ","pages":"423-432"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypofractionated versus Conventional Postmastectomy Irradiation for Breast Cancer: Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyuan Wu, Lili Hou, Cheng Li, Xiaohua Li, Ying Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/BCTT.S471901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation (<i>P</i> = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes (<i>P</i> = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) (<i>P <</i> 0.001), and tumor bed planning target volume (PTV-TB) (<i>P</i> = 0.002) were significantly correlated with higher rates of acute skin toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hypofractionated WBI demonstrated similar acute skin adverse reactions compared to conventional WBI. These findings indicate that hypofractionated radiotherapy offers comparable tolerance, equivalent curative effect, convenience, and economic benefits, supporting its clinical promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"423-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297561/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S471901\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S471901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hypofractionated versus Conventional Postmastectomy Irradiation for Breast Cancer: Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity.
Purpose: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.
Methods: This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.
Results: Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation (P = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) (P < 0.001), and tumor bed planning target volume (PTV-TB) (P = 0.002) were significantly correlated with higher rates of acute skin toxicity.
Conclusion: Hypofractionated WBI demonstrated similar acute skin adverse reactions compared to conventional WBI. These findings indicate that hypofractionated radiotherapy offers comparable tolerance, equivalent curative effect, convenience, and economic benefits, supporting its clinical promotion.