乳腺癌切除术后低分次照射与传统照射:急性皮肤毒性比较。

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S471901
Zhiyuan Wu, Lili Hou, Cheng Li, Xiaohua Li, Ying Li
{"title":"乳腺癌切除术后低分次照射与传统照射:急性皮肤毒性比较。","authors":"Zhiyuan Wu, Lili Hou, Cheng Li, Xiaohua Li, Ying Li","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S471901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation (<i>P</i> = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes (<i>P</i> = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) (<i>P <</i> 0.001), and tumor bed planning target volume (PTV-TB) (<i>P</i> = 0.002) were significantly correlated with higher rates of acute skin toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hypofractionated WBI demonstrated similar acute skin adverse reactions compared to conventional WBI. These findings indicate that hypofractionated radiotherapy offers comparable tolerance, equivalent curative effect, convenience, and economic benefits, supporting its clinical promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypofractionated versus Conventional Postmastectomy Irradiation for Breast Cancer: Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiyuan Wu, Lili Hou, Cheng Li, Xiaohua Li, Ying Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/BCTT.S471901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation (<i>P</i> = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes (<i>P</i> = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) (<i>P <</i> 0.001), and tumor bed planning target volume (PTV-TB) (<i>P</i> = 0.002) were significantly correlated with higher rates of acute skin toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hypofractionated WBI demonstrated similar acute skin adverse reactions compared to conventional WBI. These findings indicate that hypofractionated radiotherapy offers comparable tolerance, equivalent curative effect, convenience, and economic benefits, supporting its clinical promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297561/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S471901\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S471901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳腺癌是女性癌症死亡的主要原因。放疗可以减少接受保乳手术(BCS)患者的复发率并延长生存期。本研究旨在比较单一机构中接受低分次放疗和常规放疗患者的急性皮肤反应,并总结相关影响因素:本研究分析了152名在BCS术后接受低分次或常规全乳房照射(WBI)的患者。急性皮肤毒性根据肿瘤放疗组(RTOG)标准进行评估。通过多变量分析确定了急性皮肤毒性的预测因素,并使用森林点进行可视化分析:75.34%与70.89%的患者出现0级反应,16.44%与15.19%的患者出现1级反应,8.22%与12.66%的患者出现2级反应,0%与1.27%的患者出现3级反应。与传统放射治疗相比,采用低分量放射治疗的患者在急性皮肤反应方面没有明显的统计学差异(P = 0.62)。多变量分析显示,转移淋巴结(P = 0.021)、全乳计划靶体积(PTV-WB)(P 0.001)和肿瘤床计划靶体积(PTV-TB)(P = 0.002)与急性皮肤毒性发生率较高显著相关:结论:与传统 WBI 相比,低分量 WBI 显示出相似的急性皮肤不良反应。这些研究结果表明,低分次放射治疗具有相似的耐受性、同等的疗效、便利性和经济效益,支持其临床推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypofractionated versus Conventional Postmastectomy Irradiation for Breast Cancer: Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity.

Purpose: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.

Methods: This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.

Results: Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation (P = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) (P < 0.001), and tumor bed planning target volume (PTV-TB) (P = 0.002) were significantly correlated with higher rates of acute skin toxicity.

Conclusion: Hypofractionated WBI demonstrated similar acute skin adverse reactions compared to conventional WBI. These findings indicate that hypofractionated radiotherapy offers comparable tolerance, equivalent curative effect, convenience, and economic benefits, supporting its clinical promotion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信