{"title":"左侧乳腺癌基注强化锁定场放疗的剂量学研究和稳健性分析","authors":"Chengqiong Tang, Qian Cao, Xiuqing Ai","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S447955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The locked vision plan can make the left breast cancer heart and lung organs dose.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare the dosimetric differences between field-locked and field-split plans in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer, to explore the effect of field-locking on the low-dose region, and to evaluate its robustness to the radiotherapy target, in order to provide a reference for the selection of clinical radiotherapy protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients were selected after radical left breast cancer surgery, and 7-field locked-field and split-field plans were developed to compare the dose difference (∆D) between the target area and each organ at risk, and to introduce offsets of 3, 5 and 7 mm in six directions and recalculate the perturbed dose distributions, and to compare the ∆D between the original and the perturbed plans according to the robustness of the plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the D<sub>98%</sub>, D<sub>95%</sub> and D<sub>mean</sub> values of the planning target volume (PTV) of the two plans differed little and were not statistically different. The locked field plan provided better protection for the left lung, right lung, heart, right breast and left anterior descending coronary artery. For PTV∆D<sub>98%</sub>, PTV∆D<sub>95%</sub>, PTV∆D<sub>mean</sub>, the ∆D was higher for the Locked Fields plan, and for LungL∆5, LungL∆20 and Heart∆<sub>mean</sub>, the ∆D was higher for the original plan.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It was concluded that the field-locking plan could reduce the low-dose area of the affected lung and provide improved protection to the remaining critical organs, and the field-locking plan was more robust in protecting critical organs. Meanwhile, the field-locking plan showed higher sensitivity to positional deviation for target PTV.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric Study and Robustness Analysis of Base Note Intensive Locked Field Radiotherapy for Left Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chengqiong Tang, Qian Cao, Xiuqing Ai\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/BCTT.S447955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The locked vision plan can make the left breast cancer heart and lung organs dose.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare the dosimetric differences between field-locked and field-split plans in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer, to explore the effect of field-locking on the low-dose region, and to evaluate its robustness to the radiotherapy target, in order to provide a reference for the selection of clinical radiotherapy protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients were selected after radical left breast cancer surgery, and 7-field locked-field and split-field plans were developed to compare the dose difference (∆D) between the target area and each organ at risk, and to introduce offsets of 3, 5 and 7 mm in six directions and recalculate the perturbed dose distributions, and to compare the ∆D between the original and the perturbed plans according to the robustness of the plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the D<sub>98%</sub>, D<sub>95%</sub> and D<sub>mean</sub> values of the planning target volume (PTV) of the two plans differed little and were not statistically different. The locked field plan provided better protection for the left lung, right lung, heart, right breast and left anterior descending coronary artery. For PTV∆D<sub>98%</sub>, PTV∆D<sub>95%</sub>, PTV∆D<sub>mean</sub>, the ∆D was higher for the Locked Fields plan, and for LungL∆5, LungL∆20 and Heart∆<sub>mean</sub>, the ∆D was higher for the original plan.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It was concluded that the field-locking plan could reduce the low-dose area of the affected lung and provide improved protection to the remaining critical organs, and the field-locking plan was more robust in protecting critical organs. Meanwhile, the field-locking plan showed higher sensitivity to positional deviation for target PTV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S447955\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S447955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dosimetric Study and Robustness Analysis of Base Note Intensive Locked Field Radiotherapy for Left Breast Cancer.
Background: The locked vision plan can make the left breast cancer heart and lung organs dose.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the dosimetric differences between field-locked and field-split plans in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer, to explore the effect of field-locking on the low-dose region, and to evaluate its robustness to the radiotherapy target, in order to provide a reference for the selection of clinical radiotherapy protocols.
Methods: A total of 30 patients were selected after radical left breast cancer surgery, and 7-field locked-field and split-field plans were developed to compare the dose difference (∆D) between the target area and each organ at risk, and to introduce offsets of 3, 5 and 7 mm in six directions and recalculate the perturbed dose distributions, and to compare the ∆D between the original and the perturbed plans according to the robustness of the plans.
Results: The results revealed that the D98%, D95% and Dmean values of the planning target volume (PTV) of the two plans differed little and were not statistically different. The locked field plan provided better protection for the left lung, right lung, heart, right breast and left anterior descending coronary artery. For PTV∆D98%, PTV∆D95%, PTV∆Dmean, the ∆D was higher for the Locked Fields plan, and for LungL∆5, LungL∆20 and Heart∆mean, the ∆D was higher for the original plan.
Discussion: It was concluded that the field-locking plan could reduce the low-dose area of the affected lung and provide improved protection to the remaining critical organs, and the field-locking plan was more robust in protecting critical organs. Meanwhile, the field-locking plan showed higher sensitivity to positional deviation for target PTV.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
