用于机械循环装置测试的冯-威廉因子多聚体分析的增强型快速方法。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Artificial organs Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/aor.14838
Amanda G Smith, Antony P McNamee, Chris H H Chan, John Headrick, Michael J Simmonds
{"title":"用于机械循环装置测试的冯-威廉因子多聚体分析的增强型快速方法。","authors":"Amanda G Smith, Antony P McNamee, Chris H H Chan, John Headrick, Michael J Simmonds","doi":"10.1111/aor.14838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical glycoprotein in hemostasis and is an important factor in diagnosing bleeding disorders. Albeit the analysis of VWF is often compromised by inconsistent methodologies and challenges quantifying multimeric size. Current VWF multimer analysis methods are costly, time-consuming, and often inconsistent; thus, demanding skilled professionals. This study aimed to streamline and optimize the VWF multimer analysis technique, making it more efficient and reproducible, particularly for identifying or predicting mechanical circulatory support (MCS) induced bleeding disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from healthy volunteers were exposed to high shear forces via a Medtronic HeartWare ventricular assist device. VWF multimers were analyzed using vertical-gel agarose electrophoresis and Western blotting. Differences in VWF distribution were determined using densitometry, and two methods of densitometric analysis were compared: proprietary software against open-source software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the developed method: (i) protocol duration was accelerated from three days (in classical methods) to ~ eight hours; (ii) the resolution of the high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers were substantially improved; and (iii) densitometric analysis tools were validated. Additionally, the densitometry analysis using two software types showed a strong correlation between results, with the proprietary software reporting slightly higher HMW VWF percentages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This methodology is recommended for affordable, accurate, and reproducible VWF multimer evaluations during MCS use and testing. Further research comparing this method with semi-automated methods would provide additional insight and improve inter-laboratory comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An enhanced and rapid method for von Willebrand factor multimer analysis for mechanical circulatory device testing.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda G Smith, Antony P McNamee, Chris H H Chan, John Headrick, Michael J Simmonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aor.14838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical glycoprotein in hemostasis and is an important factor in diagnosing bleeding disorders. Albeit the analysis of VWF is often compromised by inconsistent methodologies and challenges quantifying multimeric size. Current VWF multimer analysis methods are costly, time-consuming, and often inconsistent; thus, demanding skilled professionals. This study aimed to streamline and optimize the VWF multimer analysis technique, making it more efficient and reproducible, particularly for identifying or predicting mechanical circulatory support (MCS) induced bleeding disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from healthy volunteers were exposed to high shear forces via a Medtronic HeartWare ventricular assist device. VWF multimers were analyzed using vertical-gel agarose electrophoresis and Western blotting. Differences in VWF distribution were determined using densitometry, and two methods of densitometric analysis were compared: proprietary software against open-source software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the developed method: (i) protocol duration was accelerated from three days (in classical methods) to ~ eight hours; (ii) the resolution of the high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers were substantially improved; and (iii) densitometric analysis tools were validated. Additionally, the densitometry analysis using two software types showed a strong correlation between results, with the proprietary software reporting slightly higher HMW VWF percentages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This methodology is recommended for affordable, accurate, and reproducible VWF multimer evaluations during MCS use and testing. Further research comparing this method with semi-automated methods would provide additional insight and improve inter-laboratory comparisons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial organs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14838\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冯-威廉因子(VWF)是止血过程中的一种重要糖蛋白,也是诊断出血性疾病的一个重要因素。尽管对 VWF 的分析常常因方法不一致和量化多聚体大小的挑战而受到影响。目前的 VWF 多聚体分析方法成本高、耗时长,而且往往不一致,因此需要熟练的专业人员。本研究旨在简化和优化 VWF 多聚体分析技术,使其更高效、可重复,尤其是在识别或预测机械循环支持(MCS)诱发的出血性疾病方面:方法:健康志愿者的血液样本通过美敦力公司的 HeartWare 心室辅助装置暴露在高剪切力下。采用垂直凝胶琼脂糖电泳和 Western 印迹法分析 VWF 多聚体。使用密度计确定了 VWF 分布的差异,并比较了两种密度计分析方法:专利软件和开源软件:使用所开发的方法:(i) 方案持续时间从传统方法的三天缩短到约八小时;(ii) 高分子量(HMW)VWF 多聚体的分辨率大幅提高;(iii) 密度计分析工具得到验证。此外,使用两种软件进行的密度计分析显示,结果之间存在很强的相关性,专利软件报告的高分子量 VWF 百分比略高:建议在使用 MCS 和进行测试时使用这种方法进行经济、准确和可重复的 VWF 多聚体评估。将此方法与半自动方法进行比较的进一步研究将提供更多的见解,并改进实验室间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An enhanced and rapid method for von Willebrand factor multimer analysis for mechanical circulatory device testing.

An enhanced and rapid method for von Willebrand factor multimer analysis for mechanical circulatory device testing.

Background: Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical glycoprotein in hemostasis and is an important factor in diagnosing bleeding disorders. Albeit the analysis of VWF is often compromised by inconsistent methodologies and challenges quantifying multimeric size. Current VWF multimer analysis methods are costly, time-consuming, and often inconsistent; thus, demanding skilled professionals. This study aimed to streamline and optimize the VWF multimer analysis technique, making it more efficient and reproducible, particularly for identifying or predicting mechanical circulatory support (MCS) induced bleeding disorders.

Methods: Blood samples from healthy volunteers were exposed to high shear forces via a Medtronic HeartWare ventricular assist device. VWF multimers were analyzed using vertical-gel agarose electrophoresis and Western blotting. Differences in VWF distribution were determined using densitometry, and two methods of densitometric analysis were compared: proprietary software against open-source software.

Results: Using the developed method: (i) protocol duration was accelerated from three days (in classical methods) to ~ eight hours; (ii) the resolution of the high molecular weight (HMW) VWF multimers were substantially improved; and (iii) densitometric analysis tools were validated. Additionally, the densitometry analysis using two software types showed a strong correlation between results, with the proprietary software reporting slightly higher HMW VWF percentages.

Conclusion: This methodology is recommended for affordable, accurate, and reproducible VWF multimer evaluations during MCS use and testing. Further research comparing this method with semi-automated methods would provide additional insight and improve inter-laboratory comparisons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信