当代美国的历史红线痕迹:来自 Add Health 队列的新证据

IF 2.6 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Reed T. DeAngelis, Brian G. Frizzelle, Robert A. Hummer, Kathleen Mullan Harris
{"title":"当代美国的历史红线痕迹:来自 Add Health 队列的新证据","authors":"Reed T. DeAngelis, Brian G. Frizzelle, Robert A. Hummer, Kathleen Mullan Harris","doi":"10.1007/s11113-024-09906-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on the legacies of historical redlining has lacked nationally representative and multilevel data. We advance this literature by analyzing new data that links historical redlining maps to the residential addresses of participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), a diverse and national cohort of adolescents who transitioned to adulthood between the mid-1990s and late 2010s (N = 10,897). We report three key findings. First, while most participants did not live within the boundaries of historical redlining maps, Black (22%) and Hispanic (28%) participants were several times more likely than their White peers (8%) to live in either a formerly yellow- or red-lined urban area in adolescence. Second, adolescents who resided in yellow- or red-lined areas also tended to live in the most disadvantaged households and neighborhoods and attained the lowest levels of socioeconomic status in adulthood. Third, Black and White adolescents who lived in rural areas also experienced similar or worse adult outcomes than their peers who lived in redlined urban areas. We also find anomalous but inconclusive patterns for the small group of Black and Hispanic participants who lived in historically affluent “green-lined” areas in adolescence, including poor adult health and high risk of contact with the criminal justice system. Given these findings, we outline avenues for future research that could include historical redlining maps, but also expand beyond urban redlining to consider nonmetropolitan areas and other contemporary indicators of structural racism.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traces of Historical Redlining in the Contemporary United States: New Evidence from the Add Health Cohort\",\"authors\":\"Reed T. DeAngelis, Brian G. Frizzelle, Robert A. Hummer, Kathleen Mullan Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11113-024-09906-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Research on the legacies of historical redlining has lacked nationally representative and multilevel data. We advance this literature by analyzing new data that links historical redlining maps to the residential addresses of participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), a diverse and national cohort of adolescents who transitioned to adulthood between the mid-1990s and late 2010s (N = 10,897). We report three key findings. First, while most participants did not live within the boundaries of historical redlining maps, Black (22%) and Hispanic (28%) participants were several times more likely than their White peers (8%) to live in either a formerly yellow- or red-lined urban area in adolescence. Second, adolescents who resided in yellow- or red-lined areas also tended to live in the most disadvantaged households and neighborhoods and attained the lowest levels of socioeconomic status in adulthood. Third, Black and White adolescents who lived in rural areas also experienced similar or worse adult outcomes than their peers who lived in redlined urban areas. We also find anomalous but inconclusive patterns for the small group of Black and Hispanic participants who lived in historically affluent “green-lined” areas in adolescence, including poor adult health and high risk of contact with the criminal justice system. Given these findings, we outline avenues for future research that could include historical redlining maps, but also expand beyond urban redlining to consider nonmetropolitan areas and other contemporary indicators of structural racism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Research and Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Research and Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09906-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09906-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对历史上的重划区遗留问题的研究缺乏具有全国代表性的多层次数据。我们通过分析新数据,将历史红线地图与 "全国青少年到成人健康纵向研究"(Add Health)参与者的居住地址联系起来,从而推动了这一文献的研究。"全国青少年到成人健康纵向研究"(Add Health)是一个多样化的全国性队列,研究对象是 20 世纪 90 年代中期到 2010 年代末之间步入成年的青少年(N = 10,897 人)。我们报告了三项重要发现。首先,虽然大多数参与者并没有生活在历史红线地图的范围内,但黑人(22%)和西班牙裔(28%)参与者在青少年时期生活在以前的黄线或红线城市地区的可能性是白人(8%)的几倍。其次,居住在黄线区或红线区的青少年往往也生活在最贫困的家庭和社区,成年后的社会经济地位也最低。第三,居住在农村地区的黑人和白人青少年在成年后的结果也与居住在城市红线区的同龄人相似或更差。我们还发现,在青少年时期生活在历来富裕的 "绿线 "地区的一小部分黑人和拉美裔参与者,其成年后的健康状况较差,与刑事司法系统接触的风险较高,这些参与者的情况虽不尽人意,但也是反常的。鉴于这些发现,我们概述了未来研究的途径,这些途径可以包括历史上的 "红线 "地图,也可以超越城市 "红线 "的范围,考虑非大都市地区和其他当代结构性种族主义指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Traces of Historical Redlining in the Contemporary United States: New Evidence from the Add Health Cohort

Traces of Historical Redlining in the Contemporary United States: New Evidence from the Add Health Cohort

Research on the legacies of historical redlining has lacked nationally representative and multilevel data. We advance this literature by analyzing new data that links historical redlining maps to the residential addresses of participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), a diverse and national cohort of adolescents who transitioned to adulthood between the mid-1990s and late 2010s (N = 10,897). We report three key findings. First, while most participants did not live within the boundaries of historical redlining maps, Black (22%) and Hispanic (28%) participants were several times more likely than their White peers (8%) to live in either a formerly yellow- or red-lined urban area in adolescence. Second, adolescents who resided in yellow- or red-lined areas also tended to live in the most disadvantaged households and neighborhoods and attained the lowest levels of socioeconomic status in adulthood. Third, Black and White adolescents who lived in rural areas also experienced similar or worse adult outcomes than their peers who lived in redlined urban areas. We also find anomalous but inconclusive patterns for the small group of Black and Hispanic participants who lived in historically affluent “green-lined” areas in adolescence, including poor adult health and high risk of contact with the criminal justice system. Given these findings, we outline avenues for future research that could include historical redlining maps, but also expand beyond urban redlining to consider nonmetropolitan areas and other contemporary indicators of structural racism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信