开发路线分析算法:使用新手和老司机进行案例研究

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Siyao Zhu , Theresa J. Chirles , Joel A. Keller , Andrew Hellinger , Yifang Xu , Gayane Yenokyan , Chia-Hsiu Chang , Rebecca Weast , Jeffrey N. Keller , Takeru Igusa , Johnathon P. Ehsani
{"title":"开发路线分析算法:使用新手和老司机进行案例研究","authors":"Siyao Zhu ,&nbsp;Theresa J. Chirles ,&nbsp;Joel A. Keller ,&nbsp;Andrew Hellinger ,&nbsp;Yifang Xu ,&nbsp;Gayane Yenokyan ,&nbsp;Chia-Hsiu Chang ,&nbsp;Rebecca Weast ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Keller ,&nbsp;Takeru Igusa ,&nbsp;Johnathon P. Ehsani","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> This study addresses the lack of methods to quantify driver familiarity with roadways, which poses a higher risk of crashes. <em>Method:</em> We present a new approach to assessing driving route diversity and familiarity using data from the <em>DrivingApp</em>, a smartphone-based research tool that collects trip-level information, including driving exposure and global positioning system (GPS) data, from young novice drivers (15–19 years old) to older drivers (67–78 years old). Using these data, we developed a GPS data-based algorithm to analyze the uniqueness of driving routes. The algorithm creates same route trip (SRT) arrays by comparing each trip of an identified user, employing statistically determined thresholds for GPS coordinate proximity and trip overlap. The optimal thresholds were established using a General Linear Model (GLM) to examine distance, and repeated observations. The Adjusted Breadth-First Search method is applied to the SRT arrays to prevent double counting or trip omission. The resulting list is classified as geographically distinct routes, or unique routes (URs). <em>Results:</em> Manual comparison of algorithm output with geographical maps yielded an overall precision of 0.93 and accuracy of 0.91. The algorithm produces two main outputs: a measure of driving diversity (number of URs) and a measure of route-based familiarity derived from the Rescorla–Wagner model. To evaluate the utility of these measures, a Gaussian mixture model clustering algorithm was used on the young novice driver dataset, revealing two distinct groups: the low-frequency driving group with lower route familiarity when having higher route diversity, whereas the high-frequency driving group with the opposite pattern. In the older driver group, there was a significant correlation found between the number of URs and Geriatric Depression Score, or walking gait speed. <em>Practical Applications:</em> These findings suggest that route diversity and familiarity could complement existing measures to understand driving safety and how driving behavior is related to physical and psychological outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 319-332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of an algorithm for analysis of routes: Case studies using novice and older drivers\",\"authors\":\"Siyao Zhu ,&nbsp;Theresa J. Chirles ,&nbsp;Joel A. Keller ,&nbsp;Andrew Hellinger ,&nbsp;Yifang Xu ,&nbsp;Gayane Yenokyan ,&nbsp;Chia-Hsiu Chang ,&nbsp;Rebecca Weast ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Keller ,&nbsp;Takeru Igusa ,&nbsp;Johnathon P. Ehsani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> This study addresses the lack of methods to quantify driver familiarity with roadways, which poses a higher risk of crashes. <em>Method:</em> We present a new approach to assessing driving route diversity and familiarity using data from the <em>DrivingApp</em>, a smartphone-based research tool that collects trip-level information, including driving exposure and global positioning system (GPS) data, from young novice drivers (15–19 years old) to older drivers (67–78 years old). Using these data, we developed a GPS data-based algorithm to analyze the uniqueness of driving routes. The algorithm creates same route trip (SRT) arrays by comparing each trip of an identified user, employing statistically determined thresholds for GPS coordinate proximity and trip overlap. The optimal thresholds were established using a General Linear Model (GLM) to examine distance, and repeated observations. The Adjusted Breadth-First Search method is applied to the SRT arrays to prevent double counting or trip omission. The resulting list is classified as geographically distinct routes, or unique routes (URs). <em>Results:</em> Manual comparison of algorithm output with geographical maps yielded an overall precision of 0.93 and accuracy of 0.91. The algorithm produces two main outputs: a measure of driving diversity (number of URs) and a measure of route-based familiarity derived from the Rescorla–Wagner model. To evaluate the utility of these measures, a Gaussian mixture model clustering algorithm was used on the young novice driver dataset, revealing two distinct groups: the low-frequency driving group with lower route familiarity when having higher route diversity, whereas the high-frequency driving group with the opposite pattern. In the older driver group, there was a significant correlation found between the number of URs and Geriatric Depression Score, or walking gait speed. <em>Practical Applications:</em> These findings suggest that route diversity and familiarity could complement existing measures to understand driving safety and how driving behavior is related to physical and psychological outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 319-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000926\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000926","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驾驶员对道路的熟悉程度会导致更高的撞车风险,而目前缺乏量化驾驶员对道路熟悉程度的方法。我们提出了一种评估驾驶路线多样性和熟悉程度的新方法,使用的数据来自于基于智能手机的研究工具 "GPS",该工具可收集年轻新手驾驶员(15-19 岁)到年长驾驶员(67-78 岁)的行程信息,包括驾驶暴露和全球定位系统 (GPS) 数据。利用这些数据,我们开发了一种基于 GPS 数据的算法来分析驾驶路线的独特性。该算法通过对已识别用户的每次行程进行比较,采用统计确定的 GPS 坐标邻近度和行程重叠度阈值,创建相同路线行程 (SRT) 阵列。最佳阈值是通过使用一般线性模型(GLM)检查距离和重复观测确定的。调整后的广度优先搜索法适用于 SRT 阵列,以防止重复计算或行程遗漏。得出的列表被归类为地理上不同的路线或独特路线(UR)。人工将算法输出与地理地图进行比较,得出的总体精确度为 0.93,准确度为 0.91。该算法有两个主要输出结果:驾驶多样性度量(UR 数量)和基于 Rescorla-Wagner 模型的路线熟悉度量。为了评估这些测量方法的实用性,我们在年轻新手驾驶员数据集上使用了高斯混合模型聚类算法,结果显示出两个不同的组别:低频率驾驶组在路线多样性较高的情况下路线熟悉度较低,而高频率驾驶组则相反。在老年驾驶员组中,UR次数与老年抑郁评分或步行步速之间存在显著相关性。这些研究结果表明,路线多样性和熟悉程度可以补充现有的测量方法,从而了解驾驶安全以及驾驶行为与生理和心理结果之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of an algorithm for analysis of routes: Case studies using novice and older drivers

Introduction: This study addresses the lack of methods to quantify driver familiarity with roadways, which poses a higher risk of crashes. Method: We present a new approach to assessing driving route diversity and familiarity using data from the DrivingApp, a smartphone-based research tool that collects trip-level information, including driving exposure and global positioning system (GPS) data, from young novice drivers (15–19 years old) to older drivers (67–78 years old). Using these data, we developed a GPS data-based algorithm to analyze the uniqueness of driving routes. The algorithm creates same route trip (SRT) arrays by comparing each trip of an identified user, employing statistically determined thresholds for GPS coordinate proximity and trip overlap. The optimal thresholds were established using a General Linear Model (GLM) to examine distance, and repeated observations. The Adjusted Breadth-First Search method is applied to the SRT arrays to prevent double counting or trip omission. The resulting list is classified as geographically distinct routes, or unique routes (URs). Results: Manual comparison of algorithm output with geographical maps yielded an overall precision of 0.93 and accuracy of 0.91. The algorithm produces two main outputs: a measure of driving diversity (number of URs) and a measure of route-based familiarity derived from the Rescorla–Wagner model. To evaluate the utility of these measures, a Gaussian mixture model clustering algorithm was used on the young novice driver dataset, revealing two distinct groups: the low-frequency driving group with lower route familiarity when having higher route diversity, whereas the high-frequency driving group with the opposite pattern. In the older driver group, there was a significant correlation found between the number of URs and Geriatric Depression Score, or walking gait speed. Practical Applications: These findings suggest that route diversity and familiarity could complement existing measures to understand driving safety and how driving behavior is related to physical and psychological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信