{"title":"在海洋经济核算中衡量海洋和沿海地区旅游业价值的替代方法","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Marine and coastal tourism is often cited as one of the dominant sectors within many ocean economies in terms of economic contribution and number of persons employed. Despite this, discussion still arises around the definition of marine and coastal tourism in relation to the forms of activity to be included and the differences between them. Methods of valuing their economic contributions are important, not only, for accurate national accounting purposes and for international comparison but, also, for tourism planning, management and investment at national and regional levels. This paper is designed to contribute to ocean economy accounting by drawing on evidence for the Republic of Ireland that permits three different methods of valuing marine and coastal tourism to be compared and the relative merits of each to be assessed. Based on a range of criteria no one method is deemed superior. It is argued, however, that an output based NACE code approach might offer the best route to robust valuation given the comparability to the other industries in ocean economy reporting but that harmonised coastal tourism expenditure surveys could be used to get a more reliable estimate of the maritime component of the tourism related NACE activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975/pdfft?md5=e813bef4893826558866e46e71e605f7&pid=1-s2.0-S0308597X24002975-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative approaches to measuring the value of tourism in marine and coastal areas in ocean economy accounting\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Marine and coastal tourism is often cited as one of the dominant sectors within many ocean economies in terms of economic contribution and number of persons employed. Despite this, discussion still arises around the definition of marine and coastal tourism in relation to the forms of activity to be included and the differences between them. Methods of valuing their economic contributions are important, not only, for accurate national accounting purposes and for international comparison but, also, for tourism planning, management and investment at national and regional levels. This paper is designed to contribute to ocean economy accounting by drawing on evidence for the Republic of Ireland that permits three different methods of valuing marine and coastal tourism to be compared and the relative merits of each to be assessed. Based on a range of criteria no one method is deemed superior. It is argued, however, that an output based NACE code approach might offer the best route to robust valuation given the comparability to the other industries in ocean economy reporting but that harmonised coastal tourism expenditure surveys could be used to get a more reliable estimate of the maritime component of the tourism related NACE activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975/pdfft?md5=e813bef4893826558866e46e71e605f7&pid=1-s2.0-S0308597X24002975-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24002975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alternative approaches to measuring the value of tourism in marine and coastal areas in ocean economy accounting
Marine and coastal tourism is often cited as one of the dominant sectors within many ocean economies in terms of economic contribution and number of persons employed. Despite this, discussion still arises around the definition of marine and coastal tourism in relation to the forms of activity to be included and the differences between them. Methods of valuing their economic contributions are important, not only, for accurate national accounting purposes and for international comparison but, also, for tourism planning, management and investment at national and regional levels. This paper is designed to contribute to ocean economy accounting by drawing on evidence for the Republic of Ireland that permits three different methods of valuing marine and coastal tourism to be compared and the relative merits of each to be assessed. Based on a range of criteria no one method is deemed superior. It is argued, however, that an output based NACE code approach might offer the best route to robust valuation given the comparability to the other industries in ocean economy reporting but that harmonised coastal tourism expenditure surveys could be used to get a more reliable estimate of the maritime component of the tourism related NACE activities.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.