成人脊柱裂翻修手术:持续护理实践中的手术评估算法和结果

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Rita H. Nguyen, John K. Chae, Kyle E. Zappi, Grant Luhmann, Alexa Kisselbach, Amanda Cruz, Jeffrey P. Greenfield
{"title":"成人脊柱裂翻修手术:持续护理实践中的手术评估算法和结果","authors":"Rita H. Nguyen, John K. Chae, Kyle E. Zappi, Grant Luhmann, Alexa Kisselbach, Amanda Cruz, Jeffrey P. Greenfield","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.focus24261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\n<p>Patients with a prior surgical history for Chiari malformation (CM) as a child or an adult who presents with a recurrence or persistence of symptoms pose a challenging clinical scenario. The authors analyzed preoperative presentations, surgical histories, and outcomes of adult CM revision cases to create an algorithm for the assessment of revision surgery in adult CM patients and contrast this with the care of pediatric CM patients within the context of an integrated continuity-of-care CM practice seeing pediatric and adult patients.</p>\nMETHODS\n<p>The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with CM0, -1, and -1.5 who were 21 years of age or older, had a prior history of CM surgery as either children or adults, and underwent revision surgery as adults at the authors’ institution from December 2009 to February 2020. The cohort was divided into three groups depending on the type of revision surgery performed: posterior fossa decompression with or without duraplasty (PFD/D group), occipitocervical fusion without ventral decompression (OCF group), and ventral decompression in the form of endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (VD group).</p>\nRESULTS\n<p>A total of 50 adult revision cases were divided into 30 PFD/D cases, 13 OCF cases, and 7 VD cases. Forty cases had previously undergone one CM surgery, and 10 had undergone two. Preoperatively, the PFD/D group had significantly fewer cases of diagnosed craniocervical instability (CCI), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and dysautonomia than the OCF and VD groups.</p>\n<p>A retroflexed odontoid was significantly more common in the VD group than in the PFD/D and OCF groups. Postoperatively, rates of improvement were 60.0% with PFD/D, 84.6% with OCF, and 85.7% with VD, but differences in these rates were not statistically significant.</p>\nCONCLUSIONS\n<p>In this challenging group of CM patients, possible etiologies warranting additional surgery included residual dorsal compression, persistent syrinx, CCI, and ventral brainstem compression from a significant retroflexed odontoid. Outcomes after revision were often favorable, but careful evaluation, patient selection, and communication with patients are needed in deciding to reoperate. The suggested algorithm can aid decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision Chiari surgery in adults: surgical evaluation algorithm and outcomes in a continuity-of-care practice\",\"authors\":\"Rita H. Nguyen, John K. Chae, Kyle E. Zappi, Grant Luhmann, Alexa Kisselbach, Amanda Cruz, Jeffrey P. Greenfield\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.5.focus24261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\n<p>Patients with a prior surgical history for Chiari malformation (CM) as a child or an adult who presents with a recurrence or persistence of symptoms pose a challenging clinical scenario. The authors analyzed preoperative presentations, surgical histories, and outcomes of adult CM revision cases to create an algorithm for the assessment of revision surgery in adult CM patients and contrast this with the care of pediatric CM patients within the context of an integrated continuity-of-care CM practice seeing pediatric and adult patients.</p>\\nMETHODS\\n<p>The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with CM0, -1, and -1.5 who were 21 years of age or older, had a prior history of CM surgery as either children or adults, and underwent revision surgery as adults at the authors’ institution from December 2009 to February 2020. The cohort was divided into three groups depending on the type of revision surgery performed: posterior fossa decompression with or without duraplasty (PFD/D group), occipitocervical fusion without ventral decompression (OCF group), and ventral decompression in the form of endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (VD group).</p>\\nRESULTS\\n<p>A total of 50 adult revision cases were divided into 30 PFD/D cases, 13 OCF cases, and 7 VD cases. Forty cases had previously undergone one CM surgery, and 10 had undergone two. Preoperatively, the PFD/D group had significantly fewer cases of diagnosed craniocervical instability (CCI), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and dysautonomia than the OCF and VD groups.</p>\\n<p>A retroflexed odontoid was significantly more common in the VD group than in the PFD/D and OCF groups. Postoperatively, rates of improvement were 60.0% with PFD/D, 84.6% with OCF, and 85.7% with VD, but differences in these rates were not statistically significant.</p>\\nCONCLUSIONS\\n<p>In this challenging group of CM patients, possible etiologies warranting additional surgery included residual dorsal compression, persistent syrinx, CCI, and ventral brainstem compression from a significant retroflexed odontoid. Outcomes after revision were often favorable, but careful evaluation, patient selection, and communication with patients are needed in deciding to reoperate. The suggested algorithm can aid decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.focus24261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.focus24261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿童或成人奇异畸形(Chiari malformation,CM)患者曾接受过手术治疗,但症状复发或持续存在,这给临床治疗带来了挑战。作者分析了成人奇异畸形翻修手术病例的术前表现、手术史和治疗结果,从而为评估成人奇异畸形患者的翻修手术制定了一套算法,并将其与治疗小儿和成人奇异畸形患者的连续性奇异畸形综合治疗方法进行了对比。方法:2009 年 12 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,作者回顾性审查了年龄在 21 岁或以上、曾在儿童或成人时期接受过 CM 手术并在成人时期接受过翻修手术的 CM0、-1 和-1.5 患者的病历。根据翻修手术的类型,该组患者被分为三组:后窝减压加或不加硬膜外成形术组(PFD/D 组)、枕颈融合术不加腹侧减压组(OCF 组)和内镜下鼻内椎体骨切除术形式的腹侧减压组(VD 组)。结果共有 50 例成人翻修病例,分为 30 例 PFD/D、13 例 OCF 和 7 例 VD。其中 40 例之前接受过一次 CM 手术,10 例接受过两次 CM 手术。术前,PFD/D 组确诊的颅颈不稳(CCI)、埃勒斯-丹洛斯综合征(Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)和自主神经功能障碍的病例明显少于 OCF 组和 VD 组。术后,PFD/D、OCF 和 VD 的好转率分别为 60.0%、84.6% 和 85.7%,但这些好转率的差异无统计学意义。结论在这组具有挑战性的 CM 患者中,需要进行额外手术的可能病因包括残余背侧压迫、持续性鞘膜积液、CCI 以及明显后屈的蝶骨造成的腹侧脑干压迫。翻修手术后的结果通常良好,但在决定是否再次手术时,需要仔细评估、选择患者并与患者沟通。建议的算法可以帮助患者做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revision Chiari surgery in adults: surgical evaluation algorithm and outcomes in a continuity-of-care practice
OBJECTIVE

Patients with a prior surgical history for Chiari malformation (CM) as a child or an adult who presents with a recurrence or persistence of symptoms pose a challenging clinical scenario. The authors analyzed preoperative presentations, surgical histories, and outcomes of adult CM revision cases to create an algorithm for the assessment of revision surgery in adult CM patients and contrast this with the care of pediatric CM patients within the context of an integrated continuity-of-care CM practice seeing pediatric and adult patients.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with CM0, -1, and -1.5 who were 21 years of age or older, had a prior history of CM surgery as either children or adults, and underwent revision surgery as adults at the authors’ institution from December 2009 to February 2020. The cohort was divided into three groups depending on the type of revision surgery performed: posterior fossa decompression with or without duraplasty (PFD/D group), occipitocervical fusion without ventral decompression (OCF group), and ventral decompression in the form of endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy (VD group).

RESULTS

A total of 50 adult revision cases were divided into 30 PFD/D cases, 13 OCF cases, and 7 VD cases. Forty cases had previously undergone one CM surgery, and 10 had undergone two. Preoperatively, the PFD/D group had significantly fewer cases of diagnosed craniocervical instability (CCI), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, and dysautonomia than the OCF and VD groups.

A retroflexed odontoid was significantly more common in the VD group than in the PFD/D and OCF groups. Postoperatively, rates of improvement were 60.0% with PFD/D, 84.6% with OCF, and 85.7% with VD, but differences in these rates were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In this challenging group of CM patients, possible etiologies warranting additional surgery included residual dorsal compression, persistent syrinx, CCI, and ventral brainstem compression from a significant retroflexed odontoid. Outcomes after revision were often favorable, but careful evaluation, patient selection, and communication with patients are needed in deciding to reoperate. The suggested algorithm can aid decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信