Elifnaz Sağlamkaya, Mohammad Saeed Shadabroo, Nurlan Tokmoldin, Tanner M. Melody, Bowen Sun, Obaid Alqahtani, Acacia Patterson, Brian A. Collins, Dieter Neher and Safa Shoaee
{"title":"聚合物基无氟烷烃混合物性能卓越背后的关键因素","authors":"Elifnaz Sağlamkaya, Mohammad Saeed Shadabroo, Nurlan Tokmoldin, Tanner M. Melody, Bowen Sun, Obaid Alqahtani, Acacia Patterson, Brian A. Collins, Dieter Neher and Safa Shoaee","doi":"10.1039/D4MH00747F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >All-small molecule (ASMs) solar cells have great potential to actualize the commercialization of organic photovoltaics owing to their higher solubility, lesser batch-to-batch variety and simpler synthesis routes compared to the blend systems that utilize conjugated polymers. However, the efficiencies of the ASMs are slightly lacking behind the polymer: small molecule bulk-heterojunctions. To address this discrepancy, we compare an ASM blend ZR1:Y6 with a polymer:small molecule blend PM7:Y6, sharing the same non-fullerene acceptor (NFA). Our analyses reveal similar energetic offset between the exciton singlet state and charge transfer state (Δ<em>E</em><small><sub>S<small><sub>1</sub></small>–CT</sub></small>) in ZR1:Y6 and PM7:Y6. In comparison to the latter, surprisingly, the ZR1:Y6 has noticeably a stronger field-dependency of charge generation. Low charge carrier mobilities of ZR1:Y6 measured, using space charge limited current measurements, entail a viable explanation for suppressed charge dissociation. Less crystalline and more intermixed domains as observed in the ZR1:Y6 system compared to polymer:Y6 blends, makes it difficult for NFA to form a continuous pathway for electron transport, which reduces the charge carrier mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":87,"journal":{"name":"Materials Horizons","volume":" 21","pages":" 5304-5312"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/mh/d4mh00747f?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key factors behind the superior performance of polymer-based NFA blends†\",\"authors\":\"Elifnaz Sağlamkaya, Mohammad Saeed Shadabroo, Nurlan Tokmoldin, Tanner M. Melody, Bowen Sun, Obaid Alqahtani, Acacia Patterson, Brian A. Collins, Dieter Neher and Safa Shoaee\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4MH00747F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >All-small molecule (ASMs) solar cells have great potential to actualize the commercialization of organic photovoltaics owing to their higher solubility, lesser batch-to-batch variety and simpler synthesis routes compared to the blend systems that utilize conjugated polymers. However, the efficiencies of the ASMs are slightly lacking behind the polymer: small molecule bulk-heterojunctions. To address this discrepancy, we compare an ASM blend ZR1:Y6 with a polymer:small molecule blend PM7:Y6, sharing the same non-fullerene acceptor (NFA). Our analyses reveal similar energetic offset between the exciton singlet state and charge transfer state (Δ<em>E</em><small><sub>S<small><sub>1</sub></small>–CT</sub></small>) in ZR1:Y6 and PM7:Y6. In comparison to the latter, surprisingly, the ZR1:Y6 has noticeably a stronger field-dependency of charge generation. Low charge carrier mobilities of ZR1:Y6 measured, using space charge limited current measurements, entail a viable explanation for suppressed charge dissociation. Less crystalline and more intermixed domains as observed in the ZR1:Y6 system compared to polymer:Y6 blends, makes it difficult for NFA to form a continuous pathway for electron transport, which reduces the charge carrier mobility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials Horizons\",\"volume\":\" 21\",\"pages\":\" 5304-5312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/mh/d4mh00747f?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/mh/d4mh00747f\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/mh/d4mh00747f","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Key factors behind the superior performance of polymer-based NFA blends†
All-small molecule (ASMs) solar cells have great potential to actualize the commercialization of organic photovoltaics owing to their higher solubility, lesser batch-to-batch variety and simpler synthesis routes compared to the blend systems that utilize conjugated polymers. However, the efficiencies of the ASMs are slightly lacking behind the polymer: small molecule bulk-heterojunctions. To address this discrepancy, we compare an ASM blend ZR1:Y6 with a polymer:small molecule blend PM7:Y6, sharing the same non-fullerene acceptor (NFA). Our analyses reveal similar energetic offset between the exciton singlet state and charge transfer state (ΔES1–CT) in ZR1:Y6 and PM7:Y6. In comparison to the latter, surprisingly, the ZR1:Y6 has noticeably a stronger field-dependency of charge generation. Low charge carrier mobilities of ZR1:Y6 measured, using space charge limited current measurements, entail a viable explanation for suppressed charge dissociation. Less crystalline and more intermixed domains as observed in the ZR1:Y6 system compared to polymer:Y6 blends, makes it difficult for NFA to form a continuous pathway for electron transport, which reduces the charge carrier mobility.