Bailey Balouch MD, Aakanksha Gupta MD, Bruce Tjaden MD, Joseph V. Lombardi MD, Jeffrey P. Carpenter MD, Nadir Ahmad MD, FACS, Yekaterina Shapiro MD
{"title":"颈动脉内膜切除术补片感染的后遗症:耳鼻喉科医生的视角。","authors":"Bailey Balouch MD, Aakanksha Gupta MD, Bruce Tjaden MD, Joseph V. Lombardi MD, Jeffrey P. Carpenter MD, Nadir Ahmad MD, FACS, Yekaterina Shapiro MD","doi":"10.1002/hed.27909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Postoperative carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patch infection is a rare but well-recognized complication of CEA. It is important for otolaryngologists to be aware of the presentation and challenges in its diagnosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who presented with a neck mass or hemorrhage and a known prior history of carotid endarterectomy with synthetic patch reconstruction were worked up with ultrasound, CT, or MRI imaging. In one case, fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed. Ultimately, all patients were taken to the operating room for neck exploration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the three patients presented in this case series, two presented with a chronic neck mass, two-to-three years after carotid endarterectomy. One patient presented acutely with hemorrhage from the carotid endarterectomy site. Carotid patch infection was diagnosed after neck exploration in all cases. Vascular surgery was consulted intra-operatively to perform definitive vascular repair.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Infected carotid patch should be suspected in patients with a history of prior CEA, as many of the presenting complaints may resemble or mimic pathology managed by otolaryngology. The onset of symptoms can be perioperative or very delayed. A multidisciplinary approach with vascular surgery and infectious disease is required for appropriate management of these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hed.27909","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequelae of carotid endarterectomy patch infection: An otolaryngologist perspective\",\"authors\":\"Bailey Balouch MD, Aakanksha Gupta MD, Bruce Tjaden MD, Joseph V. Lombardi MD, Jeffrey P. Carpenter MD, Nadir Ahmad MD, FACS, Yekaterina Shapiro MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.27909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Postoperative carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patch infection is a rare but well-recognized complication of CEA. It is important for otolaryngologists to be aware of the presentation and challenges in its diagnosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who presented with a neck mass or hemorrhage and a known prior history of carotid endarterectomy with synthetic patch reconstruction were worked up with ultrasound, CT, or MRI imaging. In one case, fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed. Ultimately, all patients were taken to the operating room for neck exploration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the three patients presented in this case series, two presented with a chronic neck mass, two-to-three years after carotid endarterectomy. One patient presented acutely with hemorrhage from the carotid endarterectomy site. Carotid patch infection was diagnosed after neck exploration in all cases. Vascular surgery was consulted intra-operatively to perform definitive vascular repair.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Infected carotid patch should be suspected in patients with a history of prior CEA, as many of the presenting complaints may resemble or mimic pathology managed by otolaryngology. The onset of symptoms can be perioperative or very delayed. A multidisciplinary approach with vascular surgery and infectious disease is required for appropriate management of these patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hed.27909\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.27909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.27909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)术后补片感染是一种罕见但公认的 CEA 并发症。耳鼻喉科医生必须了解其表现形式和诊断难题:方法:对出现颈部肿块或出血并已知既往有颈动脉内膜切除术和合成补片重建史的患者进行超声、CT 或核磁共振成像检查。在一个病例中,还进行了细针穿刺活检。最终,所有患者都被送入手术室进行颈部探查:本病例系列中的三位患者中,有两位在颈动脉内膜切除术后两到三年出现慢性颈部肿块。一名患者颈动脉内膜切除术后出现急性出血。所有病例均在颈部探查后确诊为颈动脉斑块感染。术中咨询了血管外科,以进行明确的血管修复:结论:对于有颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)病史的患者,应怀疑颈动脉斑块感染,因为许多症状可能与耳鼻喉科处理的病理相似或相似。症状可能在围手术期出现,也可能很迟才出现。要对这些患者进行适当的治疗,需要与血管外科和感染性疾病科进行多学科合作。
Sequelae of carotid endarterectomy patch infection: An otolaryngologist perspective
Background
Postoperative carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patch infection is a rare but well-recognized complication of CEA. It is important for otolaryngologists to be aware of the presentation and challenges in its diagnosis.
Methods
Patients who presented with a neck mass or hemorrhage and a known prior history of carotid endarterectomy with synthetic patch reconstruction were worked up with ultrasound, CT, or MRI imaging. In one case, fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed. Ultimately, all patients were taken to the operating room for neck exploration.
Results
Of the three patients presented in this case series, two presented with a chronic neck mass, two-to-three years after carotid endarterectomy. One patient presented acutely with hemorrhage from the carotid endarterectomy site. Carotid patch infection was diagnosed after neck exploration in all cases. Vascular surgery was consulted intra-operatively to perform definitive vascular repair.
Conclusions
Infected carotid patch should be suspected in patients with a history of prior CEA, as many of the presenting complaints may resemble or mimic pathology managed by otolaryngology. The onset of symptoms can be perioperative or very delayed. A multidisciplinary approach with vascular surgery and infectious disease is required for appropriate management of these patients.