Pavlos Texakalidis, Lei Liu, Constantine L Karras, Tord D Alden, Colin K Franz, Kevin Swong
{"title":"臂丛神经和脊髓损伤患者通过上举肌到后骨间神经转移恢复手部开放:系统综述和患者个体数据荟萃分析。","authors":"Pavlos Texakalidis, Lei Liu, Constantine L Karras, Tord D Alden, Colin K Franz, Kevin Swong","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and lower trunk brachial plexus injury (BPI) commonly result in hand paralysis. Although restoring hand function is complex and challenging to achieve, regaining volitional hand control drastically enhances functionality for these patients. The authors aimed to systematically review the outcomes of hand-opening function after supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies with 88 patients and 119 supinator to PIN transfers were included (87 transfers for SCI and 32 for BPI). In most studies, the time interval from injury to surgery was 6-12 months. Finger extension and thumb extension (Medical Research Council grade ≥ 3/5) recovered in 86.5% (103/119) and 78.1% (93/119) of cases, respectively, over a median follow-up of 19 months. The rates of recovery were similar for the SCI and BPI populations (finger extension, 87.3% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI; thumb extension, 75.8% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI). Type of injury (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.17-6.4, p = 0.95), time from injury to surgery (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.8-1.29, p = 0.88), and age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.06, p = 0.60) were not associated with odds of a successful outcome. Duration of follow-up was significantly associated with successful finger extension (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.30, p = 0.026). No donor-associated supinator weakness was reported postoperatively given that patients had an intact bicep muscle preoperatively contributing to supination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Supinator to PIN transfer is a safe and effective procedure that can achieve successful restoration of digital extension in the SCI and BPI population at similar rates. Duration of follow-up was associated with superior outcomes, which was expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"621-627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore hand opening in brachial plexus and spinal cord injury: a systematic review and individual patient-data meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Pavlos Texakalidis, Lei Liu, Constantine L Karras, Tord D Alden, Colin K Franz, Kevin Swong\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and lower trunk brachial plexus injury (BPI) commonly result in hand paralysis. Although restoring hand function is complex and challenging to achieve, regaining volitional hand control drastically enhances functionality for these patients. The authors aimed to systematically review the outcomes of hand-opening function after supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) transfer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies with 88 patients and 119 supinator to PIN transfers were included (87 transfers for SCI and 32 for BPI). In most studies, the time interval from injury to surgery was 6-12 months. Finger extension and thumb extension (Medical Research Council grade ≥ 3/5) recovered in 86.5% (103/119) and 78.1% (93/119) of cases, respectively, over a median follow-up of 19 months. The rates of recovery were similar for the SCI and BPI populations (finger extension, 87.3% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI; thumb extension, 75.8% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI). Type of injury (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.17-6.4, p = 0.95), time from injury to surgery (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.8-1.29, p = 0.88), and age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.06, p = 0.60) were not associated with odds of a successful outcome. Duration of follow-up was significantly associated with successful finger extension (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.30, p = 0.026). No donor-associated supinator weakness was reported postoperatively given that patients had an intact bicep muscle preoperatively contributing to supination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Supinator to PIN transfer is a safe and effective procedure that can achieve successful restoration of digital extension in the SCI and BPI population at similar rates. Duration of follow-up was associated with superior outcomes, which was expected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"621-627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231248\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:颈部脊髓损伤(SCI)和下躯干臂丛神经损伤(BPI)通常会导致手部瘫痪。虽然恢复手部功能是一项复杂且具有挑战性的工作,但恢复手部的自主控制能力可极大地增强这些患者的功能。作者旨在系统地回顾上行神经至后骨间神经(PIN)转移后手部张开功能的结果:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性文献综述:结果:共纳入了 16 项研究,88 名患者,119 次上举肌至 PIN 转移(其中 87 次转移用于 SCI,32 次用于 BPI)。在大多数研究中,从受伤到手术的时间间隔为 6-12 个月。在中位随访19个月期间,分别有86.5%(103/119)和78.1%(93/119)的病例手指伸展和拇指伸展功能得到恢复(医学研究委员会等级≥ 3/5)。SCI和BPI人群的恢复率相似(手指伸展,SCI为87.3%,BPI为84.3%;拇指伸展,SCI为75.8%,BPI为84.3%)。损伤类型(OR 1.05,95% CI 0.17-6.4,p = 0.95)、从损伤到手术的时间(OR 1.01,95% CI 0.8-1.29,p = 0.88)和年龄(OR 0.97,95% CI 0.90-1.06,p = 0.60)与成功的几率无关。随访时间与成功伸指的几率明显相关(OR 1.15,95% CI 1.01-1.30,p = 0.026)。鉴于患者术前的二头肌完好无损,有助于上举,因此术后未报告与供体相关的上举肌无力:Supinator到PIN转移术是一种安全有效的手术,在SCI和BPI人群中成功恢复数字伸展的比例相似。随访时间的长短与疗效的优劣有关,这也在意料之中。
Supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer to restore hand opening in brachial plexus and spinal cord injury: a systematic review and individual patient-data meta-analysis.
Objective: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and lower trunk brachial plexus injury (BPI) commonly result in hand paralysis. Although restoring hand function is complex and challenging to achieve, regaining volitional hand control drastically enhances functionality for these patients. The authors aimed to systematically review the outcomes of hand-opening function after supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) transfer.
Methods: A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.
Results: A total of 16 studies with 88 patients and 119 supinator to PIN transfers were included (87 transfers for SCI and 32 for BPI). In most studies, the time interval from injury to surgery was 6-12 months. Finger extension and thumb extension (Medical Research Council grade ≥ 3/5) recovered in 86.5% (103/119) and 78.1% (93/119) of cases, respectively, over a median follow-up of 19 months. The rates of recovery were similar for the SCI and BPI populations (finger extension, 87.3% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI; thumb extension, 75.8% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI). Type of injury (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.17-6.4, p = 0.95), time from injury to surgery (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.8-1.29, p = 0.88), and age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.06, p = 0.60) were not associated with odds of a successful outcome. Duration of follow-up was significantly associated with successful finger extension (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.30, p = 0.026). No donor-associated supinator weakness was reported postoperatively given that patients had an intact bicep muscle preoperatively contributing to supination.
Conclusions: Supinator to PIN transfer is a safe and effective procedure that can achieve successful restoration of digital extension in the SCI and BPI population at similar rates. Duration of follow-up was associated with superior outcomes, which was expected.
期刊介绍:
Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.