尿路感染的非抗生素预防:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Zeyu Han, Xianyanling Yi, Jin Li, Dazhou Liao, Jianzhong Ai
{"title":"尿路感染的非抗生素预防:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Zeyu Han, Xianyanling Yi, Jin Li, Dazhou Liao, Jianzhong Ai","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02357-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent guidelines indicated that, in addition to antibiotics, nonantibiotic interventions serve as available preventive options for urinary tract infections (UTIs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of various nonantibiotic interventions in preventing UTIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors systematically searched databases for eligible studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on one or more nonantibiotic interventions for UTI prevention, with the incidence of UTIs being a key outcome measure. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 RCTs comprising 10,495 subjects and investigating 14 interventions, were included. Nearly 80% of the RCTs utilized double-blind or triple-blind designs. In the whole group, D-mannose (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 0.21 to 0.56), vaccine (RR 0.65, 0.52 to 0.82), probiotics (RR 0.69, 0.50 to 0.94), cranberry (RR 0.72, 0.60 to 0.87), and triple therapy (cranberry plus probiotics plus vitamin A) (RR 0.27, 0.09 to 0.87), exhibited a significant reduction in UTI incidence compared to the placebo. Probiotics (RR 0.50, 0.28 to 0.89) were the most effective in the nonadult group, while vitamin D (RR 0.46, 0.27 to 0.81) showed the highest efficacy in the long follow-up group (≥ 1 year). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the interventions and the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D-mannose, triple therapy, vaccine, probiotics, and cranberry serve as potential nonantibiotic intervention options for clinical UTI prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonantibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Zeyu Han, Xianyanling Yi, Jin Li, Dazhou Liao, Jianzhong Ai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-024-02357-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent guidelines indicated that, in addition to antibiotics, nonantibiotic interventions serve as available preventive options for urinary tract infections (UTIs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of various nonantibiotic interventions in preventing UTIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors systematically searched databases for eligible studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on one or more nonantibiotic interventions for UTI prevention, with the incidence of UTIs being a key outcome measure. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 RCTs comprising 10,495 subjects and investigating 14 interventions, were included. Nearly 80% of the RCTs utilized double-blind or triple-blind designs. In the whole group, D-mannose (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 0.21 to 0.56), vaccine (RR 0.65, 0.52 to 0.82), probiotics (RR 0.69, 0.50 to 0.94), cranberry (RR 0.72, 0.60 to 0.87), and triple therapy (cranberry plus probiotics plus vitamin A) (RR 0.27, 0.09 to 0.87), exhibited a significant reduction in UTI incidence compared to the placebo. Probiotics (RR 0.50, 0.28 to 0.89) were the most effective in the nonadult group, while vitamin D (RR 0.46, 0.27 to 0.81) showed the highest efficacy in the long follow-up group (≥ 1 year). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the interventions and the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>D-mannose, triple therapy, vaccine, probiotics, and cranberry serve as potential nonantibiotic intervention options for clinical UTI prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02357-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02357-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最新指南指出,除抗生素外,非抗生素干预措施也可作为尿路感染(UTI)的预防选择。本研究旨在比较各种非抗生素干预措施在预防UTI方面的有效性和安全性:作者在数据库中系统地搜索了符合条件的研究。纳入标准包括以一种或多种预防UTI的非抗生素干预措施为重点的随机对照试验(RCT),并将UTI发病率作为主要的结果测量指标。根据年龄、性别和随访情况进行了分组分析:共纳入了 50 项研究性试验,包括 10 495 名受试者,研究了 14 种干预措施。其中近 80% 的研究采用了双盲或三盲设计。与安慰剂相比,在整个研究组中,D-甘露糖(风险比[RR] 0.34,0.21 至 0.56)、疫苗(RR 0.65,0.52 至 0.82)、益生菌(RR 0.69,0.50 至 0.94)、蔓越莓(RR 0.72,0.60 至 0.87)和三联疗法(蔓越莓加益生菌加维生素 A)(RR 0.27,0.09 至 0.87)显著降低了 UTI 发病率。益生菌(RR 0.50,0.28 至 0.89)在非成人组中最为有效,而维生素 D(RR 0.46,0.27 至 0.81)在长期随访组(≥ 1 年)中疗效最高。干预组和安慰剂组的不良反应发生率无明显差异:结论:D-甘露糖、三联疗法、疫苗、益生菌和蔓越莓是临床预防UTI的潜在非抗生素干预方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nonantibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Nonantibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: Recent guidelines indicated that, in addition to antibiotics, nonantibiotic interventions serve as available preventive options for urinary tract infections (UTIs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of various nonantibiotic interventions in preventing UTIs.

Methods: The authors systematically searched databases for eligible studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on one or more nonantibiotic interventions for UTI prevention, with the incidence of UTIs being a key outcome measure. Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, and follow-up.

Results: 50 RCTs comprising 10,495 subjects and investigating 14 interventions, were included. Nearly 80% of the RCTs utilized double-blind or triple-blind designs. In the whole group, D-mannose (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 0.21 to 0.56), vaccine (RR 0.65, 0.52 to 0.82), probiotics (RR 0.69, 0.50 to 0.94), cranberry (RR 0.72, 0.60 to 0.87), and triple therapy (cranberry plus probiotics plus vitamin A) (RR 0.27, 0.09 to 0.87), exhibited a significant reduction in UTI incidence compared to the placebo. Probiotics (RR 0.50, 0.28 to 0.89) were the most effective in the nonadult group, while vitamin D (RR 0.46, 0.27 to 0.81) showed the highest efficacy in the long follow-up group (≥ 1 year). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the interventions and the placebo group.

Conclusions: D-mannose, triple therapy, vaccine, probiotics, and cranberry serve as potential nonantibiotic intervention options for clinical UTI prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信