{"title":"肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌对生物培南敏感性和盘扩散断点的当前趋势。","authors":"Yamuna Devi Bakthavatchalam , Lydia Jennifer , Fiza Abdullah , Devishree Srinivasan , Ranjan Adhiya , Anand Ashok , Kamini Walia , Dhanalakshmi Solaimalai , Balaji Veeraraghavan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Biapenem has been recently approved by the Drug Controller General of India for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). However, there are no assessment studies that evaluate the <em>in-vitro</em> activity of biapenem against contemporary ESBL-producing Indian Enterobacterales isolates. To determine the activity of biapenem against contemporary ESBLs and/or OXA-1/ampC producing Enterobacterales and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Isolates were tested for susceptibility to biapenem and its comparators using the broth microdilution method. Presence of ESBLs (SHV, TEM, CTX-M) genes, OXA-1, and <em>amp</em>C genes (ACC, ACT, DHA, CIT/CMY, FOX) using multiplex PCR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Against ESBL with OXA-1 and/or ampC-producing <em>E. coli</em>, ESBL-<em>K. pneumoniae</em>, and cephalosporin-resistant <em>P. aeruginosa</em>, biapenem showed <em>in-vitro</em> activity similar to that of meropenem. Overall, a biapenem disc concentration of 10 μg provided no error rates for testing <em>E. coli, K. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It is more accurate to test biapenem at a 10 μg disc concentration and apply more stringent disc diffusion breakpoints for interpretation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13284,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100695"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current trend of biapenem susceptibility and disc diffusion breakpoints in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa\",\"authors\":\"Yamuna Devi Bakthavatchalam , Lydia Jennifer , Fiza Abdullah , Devishree Srinivasan , Ranjan Adhiya , Anand Ashok , Kamini Walia , Dhanalakshmi Solaimalai , Balaji Veeraraghavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Biapenem has been recently approved by the Drug Controller General of India for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). However, there are no assessment studies that evaluate the <em>in-vitro</em> activity of biapenem against contemporary ESBL-producing Indian Enterobacterales isolates. To determine the activity of biapenem against contemporary ESBLs and/or OXA-1/ampC producing Enterobacterales and <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Isolates were tested for susceptibility to biapenem and its comparators using the broth microdilution method. Presence of ESBLs (SHV, TEM, CTX-M) genes, OXA-1, and <em>amp</em>C genes (ACC, ACT, DHA, CIT/CMY, FOX) using multiplex PCR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Against ESBL with OXA-1 and/or ampC-producing <em>E. coli</em>, ESBL-<em>K. pneumoniae</em>, and cephalosporin-resistant <em>P. aeruginosa</em>, biapenem showed <em>in-vitro</em> activity similar to that of meropenem. Overall, a biapenem disc concentration of 10 μg provided no error rates for testing <em>E. coli, K. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>P. aeruginosa</em> isolates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It is more accurate to test biapenem at a 10 μg disc concentration and apply more stringent disc diffusion breakpoints for interpretation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255085724001701\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255085724001701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current trend of biapenem susceptibility and disc diffusion breakpoints in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Introduction
Biapenem has been recently approved by the Drug Controller General of India for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). However, there are no assessment studies that evaluate the in-vitro activity of biapenem against contemporary ESBL-producing Indian Enterobacterales isolates. To determine the activity of biapenem against contemporary ESBLs and/or OXA-1/ampC producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.
Methodology
Isolates were tested for susceptibility to biapenem and its comparators using the broth microdilution method. Presence of ESBLs (SHV, TEM, CTX-M) genes, OXA-1, and ampC genes (ACC, ACT, DHA, CIT/CMY, FOX) using multiplex PCR.
Results
Against ESBL with OXA-1 and/or ampC-producing E. coli, ESBL-K. pneumoniae, and cephalosporin-resistant P. aeruginosa, biapenem showed in-vitro activity similar to that of meropenem. Overall, a biapenem disc concentration of 10 μg provided no error rates for testing E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa isolates.
Conclusion
It is more accurate to test biapenem at a 10 μg disc concentration and apply more stringent disc diffusion breakpoints for interpretation.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of high standard in the form of original research, multicentric studies, meta analysis, are accepted. Current reports can be submitted as brief communications. Case reports must include review of current literature, clinical details, outcome and follow up. Letters to the editor must be a comment on or pertain to a manuscript already published in the IJMM or in relation to preliminary communication of a larger study.
Review articles, Special Articles or Guest Editorials are accepted on invitation.