复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗缺乏标准化:多中心经验。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christina Hörmandinger, David Bitschi, Daniel P Berthold, Claas Neidlein, Lennart Schroeder, Julius Watrinet, Robert Pätzold, Wolfgang Böcker, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Julian Fürmetz, Markus Bormann
{"title":"复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗缺乏标准化:多中心经验。","authors":"Christina Hörmandinger, David Bitschi, Daniel P Berthold, Claas Neidlein, Lennart Schroeder, Julius Watrinet, Robert Pätzold, Wolfgang Böcker, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Julian Fürmetz, Markus Bormann","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02616-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, the trauma mechanisms and fracture types in tibial plateau fractures (TPF) have changed. At the same time, treatment strategies have expanded with the establishment of new classification systems, extension of diagnostics and surgical strategies. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment strategies are rare. The aim of this study is to assess the extent of standardization in the treatment of complex TPF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For the study, specialists in trauma surgery/orthopaedics were presented thin-slice CT data sets of three complex TPFs including 3D reconstructions. A standardized questionnaire on fracture morphology and planned treatment strategy was then completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 surgeons from 7 hospitals (Trauma center levels I-III) were included. All three fractures were most frequently classified as Schatzker type V (fracture I: 52.2%, II: 56.5%, III: 60%). Averaged over all three fractures, 55% of the respondents chose the same patient positioning. The combination of a posteromedial and anterolateral approach was the most frequently chosen approach at 42.7%. Double plating was favored for the surgical treatment of all fractures (70.7%). Preoperative MRI, extended approaches and intraoperative fraturoscopy were significantly more common in level I trauma centres.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are major differences in the management of complex TPF. 360° treatment is carried out in all departments regardless of the level of care, but without further standardization in terms of preoperative imaging, classification, initial treatment, approach, fixation and intraoperative imaging. There are major differences within the departments with different level of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of standardisation in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures: a multicentre experience.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Hörmandinger, David Bitschi, Daniel P Berthold, Claas Neidlein, Lennart Schroeder, Julius Watrinet, Robert Pätzold, Wolfgang Böcker, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Julian Fürmetz, Markus Bormann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00068-024-02616-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, the trauma mechanisms and fracture types in tibial plateau fractures (TPF) have changed. At the same time, treatment strategies have expanded with the establishment of new classification systems, extension of diagnostics and surgical strategies. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment strategies are rare. The aim of this study is to assess the extent of standardization in the treatment of complex TPF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For the study, specialists in trauma surgery/orthopaedics were presented thin-slice CT data sets of three complex TPFs including 3D reconstructions. A standardized questionnaire on fracture morphology and planned treatment strategy was then completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 surgeons from 7 hospitals (Trauma center levels I-III) were included. All three fractures were most frequently classified as Schatzker type V (fracture I: 52.2%, II: 56.5%, III: 60%). Averaged over all three fractures, 55% of the respondents chose the same patient positioning. The combination of a posteromedial and anterolateral approach was the most frequently chosen approach at 42.7%. Double plating was favored for the surgical treatment of all fractures (70.7%). Preoperative MRI, extended approaches and intraoperative fraturoscopy were significantly more common in level I trauma centres.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are major differences in the management of complex TPF. 360° treatment is carried out in all departments regardless of the level of care, but without further standardization in terms of preoperative imaging, classification, initial treatment, approach, fixation and intraoperative imaging. There are major differences within the departments with different level of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02616-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02616-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,胫骨平台骨折(TPF)的创伤机制和骨折类型发生了变化。与此同时,随着新分类系统的建立、诊断和手术策略的扩展,治疗策略也在不断扩展。以证据为基础的治疗策略建议并不多见。本研究旨在评估复杂 TPF 治疗的标准化程度:研究向创伤外科/骨科专家提供了三例复杂 TPF 的薄片 CT 数据集,包括三维重建。然后填写一份关于骨折形态和计划治疗策略的标准化问卷:结果:共有来自 7 家医院(一级至三级创伤中心)的 23 名外科医生参与了调查。所有三种骨折最常被归类为 Schatzker V 型(I 型骨折:52.2%;II 型骨折:56.5%;III 型骨折:60%)。对所有三种骨折进行平均,55%的受访者选择了相同的患者体位。后内侧和前外侧联合入路是最常见的入路,占 42.7%。所有骨折的手术治疗均采用双层钢板固定(70.7%)。在一级创伤中心,术前核磁共振成像、扩展入路和术中骨膜镜检查明显更常见:结论:复杂 TPF 的治疗存在很大差异。结论:复杂 TPF 的治疗存在很大差异。所有科室都在进行 360° 治疗,无论医疗水平如何,但在术前成像、分类、初始治疗、方法、固定和术中成像方面没有进一步标准化。不同护理级别的科室之间存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lack of standardisation in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures: a multicentre experience.

Lack of standardisation in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures: a multicentre experience.

Objective: In recent years, the trauma mechanisms and fracture types in tibial plateau fractures (TPF) have changed. At the same time, treatment strategies have expanded with the establishment of new classification systems, extension of diagnostics and surgical strategies. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment strategies are rare. The aim of this study is to assess the extent of standardization in the treatment of complex TPF.

Material and methods: For the study, specialists in trauma surgery/orthopaedics were presented thin-slice CT data sets of three complex TPFs including 3D reconstructions. A standardized questionnaire on fracture morphology and planned treatment strategy was then completed.

Results: A total of 23 surgeons from 7 hospitals (Trauma center levels I-III) were included. All three fractures were most frequently classified as Schatzker type V (fracture I: 52.2%, II: 56.5%, III: 60%). Averaged over all three fractures, 55% of the respondents chose the same patient positioning. The combination of a posteromedial and anterolateral approach was the most frequently chosen approach at 42.7%. Double plating was favored for the surgical treatment of all fractures (70.7%). Preoperative MRI, extended approaches and intraoperative fraturoscopy were significantly more common in level I trauma centres.

Conclusion: There are major differences in the management of complex TPF. 360° treatment is carried out in all departments regardless of the level of care, but without further standardization in terms of preoperative imaging, classification, initial treatment, approach, fixation and intraoperative imaging. There are major differences within the departments with different level of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信