外周血免疫状态与鞘内炎症标志物之间的关系可区分多发性硬化症的临床表型。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ana Turčić, Josip Knežević, Ljiljana Zaninović, Mario Habek, Magdalena Krbot Skorić, Antonija Babić, Željka Vogrinc
{"title":"外周血免疫状态与鞘内炎症标志物之间的关系可区分多发性硬化症的临床表型。","authors":"Ana Turčić,&nbsp;Josip Knežević,&nbsp;Ljiljana Zaninović,&nbsp;Mario Habek,&nbsp;Magdalena Krbot Skorić,&nbsp;Antonija Babić,&nbsp;Željka Vogrinc","doi":"10.1007/s13760-024-02597-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The difference in the clinical course, response to therapy, and distribution of CNS inflammation in primary-progressive (PPMS) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) suggests differences in the underlying immunological characteristics of the disease. We aimed to investigate differences in immunological profiles in relation to intrathecal inflammation in different MS forms.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The peripheral blood (PB) proportions of CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells and CD19 + B-cells were retrospectively compared with the markers of intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG) synthesis at diagnosis: IgG index, percentage of intrathecal IgG synthesis (IF IgG), the number of oligoclonal bands (OCB), depending on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) function, and antibody specific index to neurotrophic viruses (MRZH reaction).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-six controls, 71 RRMS and 25 PPMS were enrolled. PPMS had higher percentage of CD4 + T-cells compared to RRMS (<i>P</i> = 0.043) and controls (<i>P</i> = 0.003). The percentage of CD8 + T-cells and CD19 + B-cells, and respective absolute cell counts did not differ according to the MS phenotype. In RRMS with the dysfunctional BBB, the IgG index (<i>r</i> = 0.642, <i>P</i> = 0.012) correlated significantly with the CD19 + B-cells while the CD4 + T-cells inversely correlated with IF IgG (<i>r</i>=-0.574, <i>P</i> = 0.039). Interestingly, in PPMS the number of OCB was positively associated with CD4+ (<i>r</i> = 0.603, <i>P</i> = 0.015) and negatively associated with CD8 + T-cells (<i>r</i>=-0.554, <i>P</i> = 0.033), while IF IgG negatively correlated with CD8 + T-cells (<i>r</i>=-0.689, <i>P</i> = 0.003), but only in the preserved BBB function.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The PB CD4 + T-cells and B-cells were associated with the intrathecal inflammation in RRMS with BBB dysfunction while CD8 + T-cells were involved in PPMS with CNS-compartmentalized inflammation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":"124 6","pages":"1935 - 1944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between peripheral blood immunological status and intrathecal inflammatory markers differentiate multiple sclerosis clinical phenotypes\",\"authors\":\"Ana Turčić,&nbsp;Josip Knežević,&nbsp;Ljiljana Zaninović,&nbsp;Mario Habek,&nbsp;Magdalena Krbot Skorić,&nbsp;Antonija Babić,&nbsp;Željka Vogrinc\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13760-024-02597-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The difference in the clinical course, response to therapy, and distribution of CNS inflammation in primary-progressive (PPMS) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) suggests differences in the underlying immunological characteristics of the disease. We aimed to investigate differences in immunological profiles in relation to intrathecal inflammation in different MS forms.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The peripheral blood (PB) proportions of CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells and CD19 + B-cells were retrospectively compared with the markers of intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG) synthesis at diagnosis: IgG index, percentage of intrathecal IgG synthesis (IF IgG), the number of oligoclonal bands (OCB), depending on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) function, and antibody specific index to neurotrophic viruses (MRZH reaction).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-six controls, 71 RRMS and 25 PPMS were enrolled. PPMS had higher percentage of CD4 + T-cells compared to RRMS (<i>P</i> = 0.043) and controls (<i>P</i> = 0.003). The percentage of CD8 + T-cells and CD19 + B-cells, and respective absolute cell counts did not differ according to the MS phenotype. In RRMS with the dysfunctional BBB, the IgG index (<i>r</i> = 0.642, <i>P</i> = 0.012) correlated significantly with the CD19 + B-cells while the CD4 + T-cells inversely correlated with IF IgG (<i>r</i>=-0.574, <i>P</i> = 0.039). Interestingly, in PPMS the number of OCB was positively associated with CD4+ (<i>r</i> = 0.603, <i>P</i> = 0.015) and negatively associated with CD8 + T-cells (<i>r</i>=-0.554, <i>P</i> = 0.033), while IF IgG negatively correlated with CD8 + T-cells (<i>r</i>=-0.689, <i>P</i> = 0.003), but only in the preserved BBB function.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The PB CD4 + T-cells and B-cells were associated with the intrathecal inflammation in RRMS with BBB dysfunction while CD8 + T-cells were involved in PPMS with CNS-compartmentalized inflammation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"124 6\",\"pages\":\"1935 - 1944\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13760-024-02597-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13760-024-02597-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性进展型多发性硬化症(PPMS)和复发性缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)在临床过程、治疗反应和中枢神经系统炎症分布方面的差异表明,该疾病的潜在免疫学特征存在差异。我们的目的是研究不同类型多发性硬化症患者鞘内炎症相关免疫学特征的差异:方法:将外周血(PB)中 CD4 +、CD8 + T 细胞和 CD19 + B 细胞的比例与诊断时鞘内免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)合成的标志物进行回顾性比较:IgG 指数、鞘内 IgG 合成百分比(IF IgG)、寡克隆带数量(OCB)(取决于血脑屏障(BBB)功能)以及神经营养病毒抗体特异性指数(MRZH 反应):结果:36名对照组患者、71名RRMS患者和25名PPMS患者参加了研究。与 RRMS(P = 0.043)和对照组(P = 0.003)相比,PPMS 的 CD4 + T 细胞比例更高。CD8 + T细胞和CD19 + B细胞的比例以及各自的绝对细胞数在多发性硬化表型上没有差异。在BBB功能障碍的RRMS中,IgG指数(r=0.642,P=0.012)与CD19 + B细胞显著相关,而CD4 + T细胞与IF IgG成反比(r=-0.574,P=0.039)。有趣的是,在 PPMS 中,OCB 的数量与 CD4+ 呈正相关(r=0.603,P=0.015),与 CD8+ T 细胞呈负相关(r=-0.554,P=0.033),而 IF IgG 与 CD8+ T 细胞呈负相关(r=-0.689,P=0.003),但仅限于 BBB 功能保留的情况:结论:PB CD4 + T细胞和B细胞与伴有BBB功能障碍的RRMS患者的鞘内炎症有关,而CD8 + T细胞参与了伴有中枢神经系统室化炎症的PPMS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association between peripheral blood immunological status and intrathecal inflammatory markers differentiate multiple sclerosis clinical phenotypes

Association between peripheral blood immunological status and intrathecal inflammatory markers differentiate multiple sclerosis clinical phenotypes

Association between peripheral blood immunological status and intrathecal inflammatory markers differentiate multiple sclerosis clinical phenotypes

Background

The difference in the clinical course, response to therapy, and distribution of CNS inflammation in primary-progressive (PPMS) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) suggests differences in the underlying immunological characteristics of the disease. We aimed to investigate differences in immunological profiles in relation to intrathecal inflammation in different MS forms.

Methods

The peripheral blood (PB) proportions of CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells and CD19 + B-cells were retrospectively compared with the markers of intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG) synthesis at diagnosis: IgG index, percentage of intrathecal IgG synthesis (IF IgG), the number of oligoclonal bands (OCB), depending on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) function, and antibody specific index to neurotrophic viruses (MRZH reaction).

Results

Thirty-six controls, 71 RRMS and 25 PPMS were enrolled. PPMS had higher percentage of CD4 + T-cells compared to RRMS (P = 0.043) and controls (P = 0.003). The percentage of CD8 + T-cells and CD19 + B-cells, and respective absolute cell counts did not differ according to the MS phenotype. In RRMS with the dysfunctional BBB, the IgG index (r = 0.642, P = 0.012) correlated significantly with the CD19 + B-cells while the CD4 + T-cells inversely correlated with IF IgG (r=-0.574, P = 0.039). Interestingly, in PPMS the number of OCB was positively associated with CD4+ (r = 0.603, P = 0.015) and negatively associated with CD8 + T-cells (r=-0.554, P = 0.033), while IF IgG negatively correlated with CD8 + T-cells (r=-0.689, P = 0.003), but only in the preserved BBB function.

Conclusions

The PB CD4 + T-cells and B-cells were associated with the intrathecal inflammation in RRMS with BBB dysfunction while CD8 + T-cells were involved in PPMS with CNS-compartmentalized inflammation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信