用改进的色差方程连接仪器和视觉感知:多中心研究

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sascha Hein , Omnia Saleh , Changjun Li , Julian Nold , Stephen Westland
{"title":"用改进的色差方程连接仪器和视觉感知:多中心研究","authors":"Sascha Hein ,&nbsp;Omnia Saleh ,&nbsp;Changjun Li ,&nbsp;Julian Nold ,&nbsp;Stephen Westland","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This multicenter study aimed to evaluate visual-instrumental agreement of six color measurement devices and optimize three color difference equations using a dataset of visual color differences (∆V) from expert observers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 154 expert observers from 16 sites across 5 countries participated, providing visual scaling on 26 sample pairs of artificial teeth using magnitude estimation. Three color difference equations (Δ<em>E</em>*<sub>ab</sub>, ∆<em>E</em><sub>00</sub>, and CAM16-UCS) were tested. Optimization of all three equations was performed using device-specific weights, and the standardized residual sum of squares (<em>STRESS</em>) index was used to evaluate visual-instrumental agreement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Δ<em>E</em>*<sub>ab</sub> formula exhibited <em>STRESS</em> values from 18 to 40, with visual-instrumental agreement between 60 % and 82 %. The ∆<em>E</em><sub>00</sub> formula showed <em>STRESS</em> values from 26 to 32, representing visual-instrumental agreement of 68 % to 74 %. CAM16-UCS demonstrated <em>STRESS</em> values from 32 – 39, with visual-instrumental agreement between 61–68 %. Following optimization, <em>STRESS</em> values decreased for all three formulas, with Δ<em>E</em><sup>’</sup> demonstrating average visual-instrumental agreement of 79 % and ∆<em>E</em><sub>00</sub> of 78 %. CAM16-UCS showed average visual-instrumental agreement of 76 % post optimization.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Optimization of color difference equations notably improved visual-instrumental agreement, overshadowing device performance. The optimzed Δ<em>E</em><sup>’</sup> formula demonstrated the best overall performance combining computational simplicty with outstanding visual-instrumental agreement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":"40 10","pages":"Pages 1497-1506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124002045/pdfft?md5=5c7d5072aa729b2acffbfd2bc78098fb&pid=1-s2.0-S0109564124002045-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging instrumental and visual perception with improved color difference equations: A multi-center study\",\"authors\":\"Sascha Hein ,&nbsp;Omnia Saleh ,&nbsp;Changjun Li ,&nbsp;Julian Nold ,&nbsp;Stephen Westland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dental.2024.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This multicenter study aimed to evaluate visual-instrumental agreement of six color measurement devices and optimize three color difference equations using a dataset of visual color differences (∆V) from expert observers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 154 expert observers from 16 sites across 5 countries participated, providing visual scaling on 26 sample pairs of artificial teeth using magnitude estimation. Three color difference equations (Δ<em>E</em>*<sub>ab</sub>, ∆<em>E</em><sub>00</sub>, and CAM16-UCS) were tested. Optimization of all three equations was performed using device-specific weights, and the standardized residual sum of squares (<em>STRESS</em>) index was used to evaluate visual-instrumental agreement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Δ<em>E</em>*<sub>ab</sub> formula exhibited <em>STRESS</em> values from 18 to 40, with visual-instrumental agreement between 60 % and 82 %. The ∆<em>E</em><sub>00</sub> formula showed <em>STRESS</em> values from 26 to 32, representing visual-instrumental agreement of 68 % to 74 %. CAM16-UCS demonstrated <em>STRESS</em> values from 32 – 39, with visual-instrumental agreement between 61–68 %. Following optimization, <em>STRESS</em> values decreased for all three formulas, with Δ<em>E</em><sup>’</sup> demonstrating average visual-instrumental agreement of 79 % and ∆<em>E</em><sub>00</sub> of 78 %. CAM16-UCS showed average visual-instrumental agreement of 76 % post optimization.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Optimization of color difference equations notably improved visual-instrumental agreement, overshadowing device performance. The optimzed Δ<em>E</em><sup>’</sup> formula demonstrated the best overall performance combining computational simplicty with outstanding visual-instrumental agreement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Materials\",\"volume\":\"40 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1497-1506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124002045/pdfft?md5=5c7d5072aa729b2acffbfd2bc78098fb&pid=1-s2.0-S0109564124002045-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124002045\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124002045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:这项多中心研究旨在评估六种颜色测量设备的视觉-仪器一致性,并利用专家观察员提供的视觉色差 (∆V) 数据集优化三种色差方程:方法: 共有来自 5 个国家 16 个地点的 154 位专家观察者参与,他们使用幅度估算法对 26 对人造牙齿样本进行了视觉评分。测试了三种色差方程(ΔE*ab、ΔE00 和 CAM16-UCS)。使用特定设备的权重对所有三个方程进行了优化,并使用标准化残差平方和(STRESS)指数来评估视觉-仪器一致性:结果:ΔE*ab 公式的 STRESS 值在 18 到 40 之间,目测与仪器的一致性在 60% 到 82% 之间。ΔE00 公式的 STRESS 值为 26 到 32,目测-仪器测量的一致性为 68% 到 74%。CAM16-UCS 的 STRESS 值在 32 - 39 之间,目测-仪器一致性在 61 - 68 % 之间。优化后,所有三个公式的 STRESS 值均有所下降,ΔE' 的平均目测-仪器一致性为 79%,ΔE00 为 78%。优化后,CAM16-UCS 的平均目测-仪器一致性为 76%:意义:色差方程的优化显著提高了目测与仪器的一致性,使设备性能更加突出。优化后的ΔE'公式综合了计算简便性和出色的视觉-仪器一致性,表现出最佳的整体性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging instrumental and visual perception with improved color difference equations: A multi-center study

Objectives

This multicenter study aimed to evaluate visual-instrumental agreement of six color measurement devices and optimize three color difference equations using a dataset of visual color differences (∆V) from expert observers.

Methods

A total of 154 expert observers from 16 sites across 5 countries participated, providing visual scaling on 26 sample pairs of artificial teeth using magnitude estimation. Three color difference equations (ΔE*ab, ∆E00, and CAM16-UCS) were tested. Optimization of all three equations was performed using device-specific weights, and the standardized residual sum of squares (STRESS) index was used to evaluate visual-instrumental agreement.

Results

The ΔE*ab formula exhibited STRESS values from 18 to 40, with visual-instrumental agreement between 60 % and 82 %. The ∆E00 formula showed STRESS values from 26 to 32, representing visual-instrumental agreement of 68 % to 74 %. CAM16-UCS demonstrated STRESS values from 32 – 39, with visual-instrumental agreement between 61–68 %. Following optimization, STRESS values decreased for all three formulas, with ΔE demonstrating average visual-instrumental agreement of 79 % and ∆E00 of 78 %. CAM16-UCS showed average visual-instrumental agreement of 76 % post optimization.

Significance

Optimization of color difference equations notably improved visual-instrumental agreement, overshadowing device performance. The optimzed ΔE formula demonstrated the best overall performance combining computational simplicty with outstanding visual-instrumental agreement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信