利用考古、实验和人种学数据集对早期贝刀生产进行比较研究:澳大利亚北部 46,000 年的 Melo(腹足纲:Volutidae)贝刀制造史

IF 2 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
{"title":"利用考古、实验和人种学数据集对早期贝刀生产进行比较研究:澳大利亚北部 46,000 年的 Melo(腹足纲:Volutidae)贝刀制造史","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2024.101614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate archaeological evidence for the early production of <em>Melo</em> (or commonly named ‘baler’) shell knives recovered from Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene deposits in Boodie Cave, Barrow Island. The site is in the Country of Thalanyji people in northwestern Western Australia. The oldest shell knife fragments were recovered from units dated to 46.2–42.6 ka, making this one of the oldest <em>Homo sapiens sapiens</em> shell tool technologies currently described. We situate this early and ongoing tradition of shell tool manufacture within recent discussions of the early development of shell industries from both Island Southeast Asia and globally. Although shell knives have been previously reported from Pilbara and Gulf of Carpentaria surface middens in northern Australia, systematic analysis of the manufacturing process and associated debris, and especially from pre-Holocene contexts, has not been previously conducted. This research explores the shell knife<!--> <em>chaîne opératoire</em> <!-->through the integration of three data sets derived from archaeology, ethnography, and experimental archaeology. This study highlights the significance of shell tool industries in the northwest of Australia, and globally,<!--> <!-->from the Pleistocene and into the<!--> <!-->Late Holocene<!--> <!-->in areas with limited access to hard rock geology where shell reduction represents a unique technological strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027841652400045X/pdfft?md5=827a65e4b43040827ca7bc8033f62ee7&pid=1-s2.0-S027841652400045X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of early shell knife production using archaeological, experimental and ethnographic datasets: 46,000 years of Melo (Gastropoda: Volutidae) shell knife manufacture in northern Australia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaa.2024.101614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigate archaeological evidence for the early production of <em>Melo</em> (or commonly named ‘baler’) shell knives recovered from Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene deposits in Boodie Cave, Barrow Island. The site is in the Country of Thalanyji people in northwestern Western Australia. The oldest shell knife fragments were recovered from units dated to 46.2–42.6 ka, making this one of the oldest <em>Homo sapiens sapiens</em> shell tool technologies currently described. We situate this early and ongoing tradition of shell tool manufacture within recent discussions of the early development of shell industries from both Island Southeast Asia and globally. Although shell knives have been previously reported from Pilbara and Gulf of Carpentaria surface middens in northern Australia, systematic analysis of the manufacturing process and associated debris, and especially from pre-Holocene contexts, has not been previously conducted. This research explores the shell knife<!--> <em>chaîne opératoire</em> <!-->through the integration of three data sets derived from archaeology, ethnography, and experimental archaeology. This study highlights the significance of shell tool industries in the northwest of Australia, and globally,<!--> <!-->from the Pleistocene and into the<!--> <!-->Late Holocene<!--> <!-->in areas with limited access to hard rock geology where shell reduction represents a unique technological strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027841652400045X/pdfft?md5=827a65e4b43040827ca7bc8033f62ee7&pid=1-s2.0-S027841652400045X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027841652400045X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027841652400045X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了从巴罗岛 Boodie 洞穴晚更新世和全新世早期沉积物中发现的早期制作贝壳刀(俗称 "打包刀")的考古证据。该遗址位于西澳大利亚西北部的塔兰吉人居住区。最古老的贝壳刀碎片是从年代为 46.2-42.6 ka 的单元中发掘出来的,这使得贝壳刀成为目前所描述的最古老的贝壳工具技术之一。我们将这一早期和持续的贝壳工具制造传统置于最近关于东南亚岛屿和全球贝壳工业早期发展的讨论之中。尽管之前有报道称澳大利亚北部的皮尔巴拉和卡奔塔利亚湾地表掘塚出土过贝壳刀具,但对其制造过程和相关残片,特别是全新世以前的情况,还没有进行过系统的分析。本研究通过整合考古学、人种学和实验考古学的三组数据,对贝壳刀具进行了探索。这项研究强调了贝壳工具工业在澳大利亚西北部以及全球范围内的重要性,从更新世到全新世晚期,在这些地区,硬岩地质条件有限,贝壳切割代表了一种独特的技术策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of early shell knife production using archaeological, experimental and ethnographic datasets: 46,000 years of Melo (Gastropoda: Volutidae) shell knife manufacture in northern Australia

We investigate archaeological evidence for the early production of Melo (or commonly named ‘baler’) shell knives recovered from Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene deposits in Boodie Cave, Barrow Island. The site is in the Country of Thalanyji people in northwestern Western Australia. The oldest shell knife fragments were recovered from units dated to 46.2–42.6 ka, making this one of the oldest Homo sapiens sapiens shell tool technologies currently described. We situate this early and ongoing tradition of shell tool manufacture within recent discussions of the early development of shell industries from both Island Southeast Asia and globally. Although shell knives have been previously reported from Pilbara and Gulf of Carpentaria surface middens in northern Australia, systematic analysis of the manufacturing process and associated debris, and especially from pre-Holocene contexts, has not been previously conducted. This research explores the shell knife chaîne opératoire through the integration of three data sets derived from archaeology, ethnography, and experimental archaeology. This study highlights the significance of shell tool industries in the northwest of Australia, and globally, from the Pleistocene and into the Late Holocene in areas with limited access to hard rock geology where shell reduction represents a unique technological strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信