唐氏综合症青少年的语音识别能力和空间听力:与听阈和听觉工作记忆的关系

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ear and Hearing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549
Kumari Anshu, Kayla Kristensen, Shelly P Godar, Xin Zhou, Sigan L Hartley, Ruth Y Litovsky
{"title":"唐氏综合症青少年的语音识别能力和空间听力:与听阈和听觉工作记忆的关系","authors":"Kumari Anshu, Kayla Kristensen, Shelly P Godar, Xin Zhou, Sigan L Hartley, Ruth Y Litovsky","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have a higher incidence of hearing loss (HL) compared with their peers without developmental disabilities. Little is known about the associations between HL and functional hearing for individuals with DS. This study investigated two aspects of auditory functions, \"what\" (understanding the content of sound) and \"where\" (localizing the source of sound), in young adults with DS. Speech reception thresholds in quiet and in the presence of interferers provided insight into speech recognition, that is, the \"what\" aspect of auditory maturation. Insights into \"where\" aspect of auditory maturation were gained from evaluating speech reception thresholds in colocated versus separated conditions (quantifying spatial release from masking) as well as right versus left discrimination and sound location identification. Auditory functions in the \"where\" domain develop during earlier stages of cognitive development in contrast with the later developing \"what\" functions. We hypothesized that young adults with DS would exhibit stronger \"where\" than \"what\" auditory functioning, albeit with the potential impact of HL. Considering the importance of auditory working memory and receptive vocabulary for speech recognition, we hypothesized that better speech recognition in young adults with DS, in quiet and with speech interferers, would be associated with better auditory working memory ability and receptive vocabulary.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nineteen young adults with DS (aged 19 to 24 years) participated in the study and completed assessments on pure-tone audiometry, right versus left discrimination, sound location identification, and speech recognition in quiet and with speech interferers that were colocated or spatially separated. Results were compared with published data from children and adults without DS and HL, tested using similar protocols and stimuli. Digit Span tests assessed auditory working memory. Receptive vocabulary was examined using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Fifth Edition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven participants (37%) had HL in at least 1 ear; 4 individuals had mild HL, and 3 had moderate HL or worse. Participants with mild or no HL had ≥75% correct at 5° separation on the discrimination task and sound localization root mean square errors (mean ± SD: 8.73° ± 2.63°) within the range of adults in the comparison group. Speech reception thresholds in young adults with DS were higher than all comparison groups. However, spatial release from masking did not differ between young adults with DS and comparison groups. Better (lower) speech reception thresholds were associated with better hearing and better auditory working memory ability. Receptive vocabulary did not predict speech recognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the absence of HL, young adults with DS exhibited higher accuracy during spatial hearing tasks as compared with speech recognition tasks. Thus, auditory processes associated with the \"where\" pathways appear to be a relative strength than those associated with \"what\" pathways in young adults with DS. Further, both HL and auditory working memory impairments contributed to difficulties in speech recognition in the presence of speech interferers. Future larger-sized samples are needed to replicate and extend our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech Recognition and Spatial Hearing in Young Adults With Down Syndrome: Relationships With Hearing Thresholds and Auditory Working Memory.\",\"authors\":\"Kumari Anshu, Kayla Kristensen, Shelly P Godar, Xin Zhou, Sigan L Hartley, Ruth Y Litovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have a higher incidence of hearing loss (HL) compared with their peers without developmental disabilities. Little is known about the associations between HL and functional hearing for individuals with DS. This study investigated two aspects of auditory functions, \\\"what\\\" (understanding the content of sound) and \\\"where\\\" (localizing the source of sound), in young adults with DS. Speech reception thresholds in quiet and in the presence of interferers provided insight into speech recognition, that is, the \\\"what\\\" aspect of auditory maturation. Insights into \\\"where\\\" aspect of auditory maturation were gained from evaluating speech reception thresholds in colocated versus separated conditions (quantifying spatial release from masking) as well as right versus left discrimination and sound location identification. Auditory functions in the \\\"where\\\" domain develop during earlier stages of cognitive development in contrast with the later developing \\\"what\\\" functions. We hypothesized that young adults with DS would exhibit stronger \\\"where\\\" than \\\"what\\\" auditory functioning, albeit with the potential impact of HL. Considering the importance of auditory working memory and receptive vocabulary for speech recognition, we hypothesized that better speech recognition in young adults with DS, in quiet and with speech interferers, would be associated with better auditory working memory ability and receptive vocabulary.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nineteen young adults with DS (aged 19 to 24 years) participated in the study and completed assessments on pure-tone audiometry, right versus left discrimination, sound location identification, and speech recognition in quiet and with speech interferers that were colocated or spatially separated. Results were compared with published data from children and adults without DS and HL, tested using similar protocols and stimuli. Digit Span tests assessed auditory working memory. Receptive vocabulary was examined using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Fifth Edition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven participants (37%) had HL in at least 1 ear; 4 individuals had mild HL, and 3 had moderate HL or worse. Participants with mild or no HL had ≥75% correct at 5° separation on the discrimination task and sound localization root mean square errors (mean ± SD: 8.73° ± 2.63°) within the range of adults in the comparison group. Speech reception thresholds in young adults with DS were higher than all comparison groups. However, spatial release from masking did not differ between young adults with DS and comparison groups. Better (lower) speech reception thresholds were associated with better hearing and better auditory working memory ability. Receptive vocabulary did not predict speech recognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the absence of HL, young adults with DS exhibited higher accuracy during spatial hearing tasks as compared with speech recognition tasks. Thus, auditory processes associated with the \\\"where\\\" pathways appear to be a relative strength than those associated with \\\"what\\\" pathways in young adults with DS. Further, both HL and auditory working memory impairments contributed to difficulties in speech recognition in the presence of speech interferers. Future larger-sized samples are needed to replicate and extend our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:与没有发育障碍的同龄人相比,唐氏综合症(DS)患者的听力损失(HL)发生率更高。人们对唐氏综合症患者听力损失与听觉功能之间的关系知之甚少。本研究从 "什么"(理解声音的内容)和 "在哪里"(定位声音的来源)两个方面对患有聋哑的年轻成年人的听觉功能进行了调查。在安静和有干扰的情况下的语音接收阈值有助于了解语音识别,即听觉成熟的 "什么 "方面。通过评估同地与分离条件下的语音接收阈值(量化掩蔽的空间释放)以及左右辨别和声音位置识别,可以了解听觉成熟的 "何处 "方面。在认知发展的早期阶段,"在哪里 "领域的听觉功能得到了发展,而 "是什么 "领域的听觉功能发展较晚。我们假设,患有 DS 的年轻成人将表现出更强的 "哪里 "听觉功能,而不是 "什么 "听觉功能,尽管这可能会受到 HL 的影响。考虑到听觉工作记忆和接受词汇对语音识别的重要性,我们假设,患有 DS 的年轻成人在安静和有语音干扰的情况下,较好的语音识别能力将与较好的听觉工作记忆能力和接受词汇有关:19名患有DS的年轻成人(19至24岁)参加了研究,并完成了纯音测听、左右辨别、声音位置识别以及在安静环境下和与语言干扰者同处或分离的环境下的语音识别评估。测试结果与已发表的无 DS 和 HL 的儿童和成人数据进行了比较,测试采用了类似的方案和刺激。数字跨度测试评估听觉工作记忆。结果显示,七名参与者(37%)患有HL:七名参与者(37%)至少有一只耳朵患有听力障碍;其中四人患有轻度听力障碍,三人患有中度或更严重的听力障碍。轻度或无 HL 的参加者在分辨任务中 5° 分离度的正确率≥75%,声音定位均方根误差(平均值±标准差:8.73°±2.63°)在对比组成人的范围内。DS 青少年的语音接收阈值高于所有对比组。然而,患有聋哑症的青壮年与对比组之间在掩蔽的空间释放方面并无差异。较好(较低)的语言接收阈值与较好的听力和较好的听觉工作记忆能力有关。接受词汇量不能预测语音识别能力:结论:在没有听力障碍的情况下,与语音识别任务相比,患有聋哑症的年轻人在空间听力任务中表现出更高的准确性。因此,与 "在哪里 "通路相关的听觉过程似乎比与 "是什么 "通路相关的听觉过程相对更强。此外,在有语音干扰的情况下,HL和听觉工作记忆障碍都会导致语音识别困难。未来还需要更大规模的样本来复制和扩展我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speech Recognition and Spatial Hearing in Young Adults With Down Syndrome: Relationships With Hearing Thresholds and Auditory Working Memory.

Objectives: Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have a higher incidence of hearing loss (HL) compared with their peers without developmental disabilities. Little is known about the associations between HL and functional hearing for individuals with DS. This study investigated two aspects of auditory functions, "what" (understanding the content of sound) and "where" (localizing the source of sound), in young adults with DS. Speech reception thresholds in quiet and in the presence of interferers provided insight into speech recognition, that is, the "what" aspect of auditory maturation. Insights into "where" aspect of auditory maturation were gained from evaluating speech reception thresholds in colocated versus separated conditions (quantifying spatial release from masking) as well as right versus left discrimination and sound location identification. Auditory functions in the "where" domain develop during earlier stages of cognitive development in contrast with the later developing "what" functions. We hypothesized that young adults with DS would exhibit stronger "where" than "what" auditory functioning, albeit with the potential impact of HL. Considering the importance of auditory working memory and receptive vocabulary for speech recognition, we hypothesized that better speech recognition in young adults with DS, in quiet and with speech interferers, would be associated with better auditory working memory ability and receptive vocabulary.

Design: Nineteen young adults with DS (aged 19 to 24 years) participated in the study and completed assessments on pure-tone audiometry, right versus left discrimination, sound location identification, and speech recognition in quiet and with speech interferers that were colocated or spatially separated. Results were compared with published data from children and adults without DS and HL, tested using similar protocols and stimuli. Digit Span tests assessed auditory working memory. Receptive vocabulary was examined using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Fifth Edition.

Results: Seven participants (37%) had HL in at least 1 ear; 4 individuals had mild HL, and 3 had moderate HL or worse. Participants with mild or no HL had ≥75% correct at 5° separation on the discrimination task and sound localization root mean square errors (mean ± SD: 8.73° ± 2.63°) within the range of adults in the comparison group. Speech reception thresholds in young adults with DS were higher than all comparison groups. However, spatial release from masking did not differ between young adults with DS and comparison groups. Better (lower) speech reception thresholds were associated with better hearing and better auditory working memory ability. Receptive vocabulary did not predict speech recognition.

Conclusions: In the absence of HL, young adults with DS exhibited higher accuracy during spatial hearing tasks as compared with speech recognition tasks. Thus, auditory processes associated with the "where" pathways appear to be a relative strength than those associated with "what" pathways in young adults with DS. Further, both HL and auditory working memory impairments contributed to difficulties in speech recognition in the presence of speech interferers. Future larger-sized samples are needed to replicate and extend our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信