用两枚或三枚套管螺钉固定狗股骨颈骨折的体外生物力学研究

IF 1 2区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Fátima Maria C Caldeira, Sheila C Rahal, Guilherme R Cassanego, Celso R Ribeiro, Sergio A A Serrato, Carlos E Mele, Paulo Masseran
{"title":"用两枚或三枚套管螺钉固定狗股骨颈骨折的体外生物力学研究","authors":"Fátima Maria C Caldeira, Sheila C Rahal, Guilherme R Cassanego, Celso R Ribeiro, Sergio A A Serrato, Carlos E Mele, Paulo Masseran","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> To evaluate the in vitro mechanical properties of basilar fractures of the femoral neck stabilized with two or three titanium-cannulated screws in dogs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Ex vivo study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong> Cadaveric canine femur (<i>n</i> = 21).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The bones were divided as follows: Group 1: control (no osteotomy); Group 2: osteotomy and stabilization with two cannulated screws; and Group 3: osteotomy and stabilization with three cannulated screws. All groups were tested with destructive axial compression with load applied to the femoral head. The stiffness, load, and displacement were evaluated at the failure of Group 1, and the yield load and displacement of Groups 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The placement of the three cannulated screws was more demanding than two cannulated screws because of the risk of cortical perforation, especially in the trochanteric fossa area. The smaller the width of the femoral neck, the higher the risk of cortical bone wall perforation. The intact control bones were stiffer (674 N/mm) than both the two-screw repair (90 N/mm) and three-screw repair (120 N/mm) groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The failure load was greatest for Group 1 (2692 N). The yield loads for Groups 3 and 2 were 586 and 303 N, respectively. There was no difference between groups for displacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In vitro cadaveric models of femoral neck basilar fractures repaired with three cannulated screws were significantly stronger than two cannulated screws, but the clinical efficacy must be evaluated by comparing them in vitro with noncannulated stainless steel screws.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Biomechanical Study of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation with Two or Three Cannulated Screws in Dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Fátima Maria C Caldeira, Sheila C Rahal, Guilherme R Cassanego, Celso R Ribeiro, Sergio A A Serrato, Carlos E Mele, Paulo Masseran\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1788802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> To evaluate the in vitro mechanical properties of basilar fractures of the femoral neck stabilized with two or three titanium-cannulated screws in dogs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Ex vivo study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong> Cadaveric canine femur (<i>n</i> = 21).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The bones were divided as follows: Group 1: control (no osteotomy); Group 2: osteotomy and stabilization with two cannulated screws; and Group 3: osteotomy and stabilization with three cannulated screws. All groups were tested with destructive axial compression with load applied to the femoral head. The stiffness, load, and displacement were evaluated at the failure of Group 1, and the yield load and displacement of Groups 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The placement of the three cannulated screws was more demanding than two cannulated screws because of the risk of cortical perforation, especially in the trochanteric fossa area. The smaller the width of the femoral neck, the higher the risk of cortical bone wall perforation. The intact control bones were stiffer (674 N/mm) than both the two-screw repair (90 N/mm) and three-screw repair (120 N/mm) groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The failure load was greatest for Group 1 (2692 N). The yield loads for Groups 3 and 2 were 586 and 303 N, respectively. There was no difference between groups for displacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In vitro cadaveric models of femoral neck basilar fractures repaired with three cannulated screws were significantly stronger than two cannulated screws, but the clinical efficacy must be evaluated by comparing them in vitro with noncannulated stainless steel screws.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788802\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788802","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的评估使用两枚或三枚钛合金套管螺钉稳定的狗股骨颈基底骨折的体外机械性能:研究设计:体外研究:尸体犬股骨(n = 21):方法:骨骼分为以下几组:第 1 组:对照组(不截骨);第 2 组:截骨并用两根套管螺钉固定;第 3 组:截骨并用三根套管螺钉固定。所有组别都进行了破坏性轴向压缩测试,并在股骨头上施加载荷。第 1 组的刚度、载荷和位移在失效时进行评估,第 2 组和第 3 组的屈服载荷和位移在失效时进行评估:由于皮质穿孔的风险,特别是在转子窝区域,三枚螺钉的置入比两枚螺钉的置入要求更高。股骨颈宽度越小,皮质骨壁穿孔的风险越高。与双螺钉修复组(90 N/mm)和三螺钉修复组(120 N/mm)相比,完好的对照组骨骼更硬(674 N/mm)(p 结论):用三枚套管螺钉修复的股骨颈基底骨折体外尸体模型的强度明显高于两枚套管螺钉,但临床疗效必须通过与非套管不锈钢螺钉进行体外比较来评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Biomechanical Study of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation with Two or Three Cannulated Screws in Dogs.

Objective:  To evaluate the in vitro mechanical properties of basilar fractures of the femoral neck stabilized with two or three titanium-cannulated screws in dogs.

Study design:  Ex vivo study.

Sample population:  Cadaveric canine femur (n = 21).

Methods:  The bones were divided as follows: Group 1: control (no osteotomy); Group 2: osteotomy and stabilization with two cannulated screws; and Group 3: osteotomy and stabilization with three cannulated screws. All groups were tested with destructive axial compression with load applied to the femoral head. The stiffness, load, and displacement were evaluated at the failure of Group 1, and the yield load and displacement of Groups 2 and 3.

Results:  The placement of the three cannulated screws was more demanding than two cannulated screws because of the risk of cortical perforation, especially in the trochanteric fossa area. The smaller the width of the femoral neck, the higher the risk of cortical bone wall perforation. The intact control bones were stiffer (674 N/mm) than both the two-screw repair (90 N/mm) and three-screw repair (120 N/mm) groups (p < 0.05). The failure load was greatest for Group 1 (2692 N). The yield loads for Groups 3 and 2 were 586 and 303 N, respectively. There was no difference between groups for displacement.

Conclusion:  In vitro cadaveric models of femoral neck basilar fractures repaired with three cannulated screws were significantly stronger than two cannulated screws, but the clinical efficacy must be evaluated by comparing them in vitro with noncannulated stainless steel screws.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信