Sung Hwan Kim, Sang Heon Lee, Jun Yong Kim, Eun Seok Park, Kyung Jin Lee, Young Koo Lee
{"title":"全内关节镜手术与开放式改良布罗斯特伦手术治疗慢性踝关节失稳的中期疗效比较。","authors":"Sung Hwan Kim, Sang Heon Lee, Jun Yong Kim, Eun Seok Park, Kyung Jin Lee, Young Koo Lee","doi":"10.4055/cios23108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the all-inside arthroscopic modified Broström operation (AMBO) and open modified Broström operation (OMBO) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) showed favorable outcomes up to 1-year short-term follow-up, concerns about the long-term stability of AMBO are still present. Therefore, we aimed to compare midterm outcomes between the 2 methods by extending the observation period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients undergoing ankle surgery between August 2013 and July 2017 were included in the AMBO (n = 37) and OMBO (n = 17) groups. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Anterior drawer test and talar tilt angle were used to evaluate the radiological outcomes. The mean follow-up duration was 59.69 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 groups both showed improved clinical and radiological results statistically. In addition, they did not differ in age, sex, or preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale score, VAS score, anterior drawer test, or talar tilt angle. No significant difference in the final follow-up postoperative clinical scores or radiological outcomes was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMBO and OMBO as treatments for CLAI did not yield differing clinical or radiological outcomes at a mean follow-up time point of 59.69 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"16 4","pages":"628-635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Midterm Outcomes between All-Inside Arthroscopic and Open Modified Broström Procedures as Treatment for Chronic Ankle Instability.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Hwan Kim, Sang Heon Lee, Jun Yong Kim, Eun Seok Park, Kyung Jin Lee, Young Koo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios23108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the all-inside arthroscopic modified Broström operation (AMBO) and open modified Broström operation (OMBO) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) showed favorable outcomes up to 1-year short-term follow-up, concerns about the long-term stability of AMBO are still present. Therefore, we aimed to compare midterm outcomes between the 2 methods by extending the observation period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four patients undergoing ankle surgery between August 2013 and July 2017 were included in the AMBO (n = 37) and OMBO (n = 17) groups. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Anterior drawer test and talar tilt angle were used to evaluate the radiological outcomes. The mean follow-up duration was 59.69 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 groups both showed improved clinical and radiological results statistically. In addition, they did not differ in age, sex, or preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale score, VAS score, anterior drawer test, or talar tilt angle. No significant difference in the final follow-up postoperative clinical scores or radiological outcomes was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMBO and OMBO as treatments for CLAI did not yield differing clinical or radiological outcomes at a mean follow-up time point of 59.69 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"628-635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Midterm Outcomes between All-Inside Arthroscopic and Open Modified Broström Procedures as Treatment for Chronic Ankle Instability.
Background: Although the all-inside arthroscopic modified Broström operation (AMBO) and open modified Broström operation (OMBO) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) showed favorable outcomes up to 1-year short-term follow-up, concerns about the long-term stability of AMBO are still present. Therefore, we aimed to compare midterm outcomes between the 2 methods by extending the observation period.
Methods: Fifty-four patients undergoing ankle surgery between August 2013 and July 2017 were included in the AMBO (n = 37) and OMBO (n = 17) groups. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Anterior drawer test and talar tilt angle were used to evaluate the radiological outcomes. The mean follow-up duration was 59.69 months.
Results: The 2 groups both showed improved clinical and radiological results statistically. In addition, they did not differ in age, sex, or preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale score, VAS score, anterior drawer test, or talar tilt angle. No significant difference in the final follow-up postoperative clinical scores or radiological outcomes was observed.
Conclusions: AMBO and OMBO as treatments for CLAI did not yield differing clinical or radiological outcomes at a mean follow-up time point of 59.69 months.