基于 CT 的自动分割框架椎体体积骨矿密度测量的再现性。

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jannis Bodden, Philipp Prucker, Anjany Sekuboyina, Malek El Husseini, Katharina Grau, Sebastian Rühling, Egon Burian, Claus Zimmer, Thomas Baum, Jan S Kirschke
{"title":"基于 CT 的自动分割框架椎体体积骨矿密度测量的再现性。","authors":"Jannis Bodden, Philipp Prucker, Anjany Sekuboyina, Malek El Husseini, Katharina Grau, Sebastian Rühling, Egon Burian, Claus Zimmer, Thomas Baum, Jan S Kirschke","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00483-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the reproducibility of automated volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurements from routine thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) assessed with segmentations by a convolutional neural network and automated correction of contrast phases, on diverse scanners, with scanner-specific asynchronous or scanner-agnostic calibrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained 679 observations from 278 CT scans in 121 patients (77 males, 63.6%) studied from 04/2019 to 06/2020. Observations consisted of two vBMD measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels (n = 169), Δcontrast phases (n = 133), scan Δsessions (n = 123), Δscanners (n = 63), or Δall of the aforementioned (n = 20), and observations lacking scanner-specific calibration (n = 171). Precision was assessed using root-mean-square error (RMSE) and root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMSCV). Cross-measurement agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots; outliers within 95% confidence interval of the limits of agreement were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels were highly precise (RMSE 3.0 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>; RMSCV 1.3%), even for consecutive scans with different Δcontrast phases (RMSCV 2.9%). Measurements from different Δscan sessions or Δscanners showed decreased precision (RMSCV 4.7% and 4.9%, respectively). Plot-review identified 12 outliers from different scan Δsessions, with signs of hydropic decompensation. Observations with Δall differences showed decreased precision compared to those lacking scanner-specific calibration (RMSCV 5.9 and 3.7, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic vBMD assessment from routine CT is precise across varying setups, when calibrated appropriately. Low precision was found in patients with signs of new or worsening hydropic decompensation, what should be considered an exclusion criterion for both opportunistic and dedicated quantitative CT.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Automated CT-based vBMD measurements are precise in various scenarios, including cross-session and cross-scanner settings, and may therefore facilitate opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and surveillance of BMD in patients undergoing routine clinical CT scans.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Artificial intelligence-based tools facilitate BMD measurements in routine clinical CT datasets. Automated BMD measurements are highly reproducible in various settings. Reliable, automated opportunistic osteoporosis diagnostics allow for large-scale application.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of CT-based opportunistic vertebral volumetric bone mineral density measurements from an automated segmentation framework.\",\"authors\":\"Jannis Bodden, Philipp Prucker, Anjany Sekuboyina, Malek El Husseini, Katharina Grau, Sebastian Rühling, Egon Burian, Claus Zimmer, Thomas Baum, Jan S Kirschke\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41747-024-00483-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the reproducibility of automated volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurements from routine thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) assessed with segmentations by a convolutional neural network and automated correction of contrast phases, on diverse scanners, with scanner-specific asynchronous or scanner-agnostic calibrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained 679 observations from 278 CT scans in 121 patients (77 males, 63.6%) studied from 04/2019 to 06/2020. Observations consisted of two vBMD measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels (n = 169), Δcontrast phases (n = 133), scan Δsessions (n = 123), Δscanners (n = 63), or Δall of the aforementioned (n = 20), and observations lacking scanner-specific calibration (n = 171). Precision was assessed using root-mean-square error (RMSE) and root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMSCV). Cross-measurement agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots; outliers within 95% confidence interval of the limits of agreement were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels were highly precise (RMSE 3.0 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>; RMSCV 1.3%), even for consecutive scans with different Δcontrast phases (RMSCV 2.9%). Measurements from different Δscan sessions or Δscanners showed decreased precision (RMSCV 4.7% and 4.9%, respectively). Plot-review identified 12 outliers from different scan Δsessions, with signs of hydropic decompensation. Observations with Δall differences showed decreased precision compared to those lacking scanner-specific calibration (RMSCV 5.9 and 3.7, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic vBMD assessment from routine CT is precise across varying setups, when calibrated appropriately. Low precision was found in patients with signs of new or worsening hydropic decompensation, what should be considered an exclusion criterion for both opportunistic and dedicated quantitative CT.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Automated CT-based vBMD measurements are precise in various scenarios, including cross-session and cross-scanner settings, and may therefore facilitate opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and surveillance of BMD in patients undergoing routine clinical CT scans.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Artificial intelligence-based tools facilitate BMD measurements in routine clinical CT datasets. Automated BMD measurements are highly reproducible in various settings. Reliable, automated opportunistic osteoporosis diagnostics allow for large-scale application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology Experimental\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00483-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00483-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:研究常规胸腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)通过卷积神经网络分割和造影剂相位自动校正进行的自动容积骨密度(vBMD)测量的可重复性:我们从2019年4月至2020年6月对121名患者(77名男性,63.6%)进行的278次CT扫描中获得了679个观察结果。观察结果包括来自Δ不同重建内核(n = 169)、Δ对比阶段(n = 133)、扫描Δ时段(n = 123)、Δ扫描仪(n = 63)或Δ上述所有(n = 20)的两次vBMD测量,以及缺乏扫描仪特定校准的观察结果(n = 171)。精度采用均方根误差(RMSE)和均方根变异系数(RMSCV)进行评估。交叉测量的一致性采用 Bland-Altman 图进行评估;对一致性界限 95% 置信区间内的异常值进行审查:不同重建内核的Δ重复测量结果非常精确(RMSE 3.0 mg/cm3;RMSCV 1.3%),即使是不同Δ对比阶段的连续扫描结果也是如此(RMSCV 2.9%)。来自不同Δ扫描时段或Δ扫描仪的测量结果显示精确度下降(RMSCV 分别为 4.7% 和 4.9%)。Plot-review 从不同的扫描Δ时段中发现了 12 个异常值,有水肿分解的迹象。与缺乏特定扫描仪校准的观测结果相比,存在Δ所有差异的观测结果显示精度下降(RMSCV分别为5.9和3.7):结论:如果校准得当,通过常规 CT 自动评估 vBMD 在不同的设置下都是精确的。在有新的或恶化的水肿失代偿迹象的患者中,精确度较低,这应被视为机会性和专用定量 CT 的排除标准:基于 CT 的自动 vBMD 测量在各种情况下都很精确,包括跨疗程和跨扫描仪设置,因此有助于对接受常规临床 CT 扫描的患者进行骨质疏松症的机会性筛查和 BMD 监测:基于人工智能的工具有助于在常规临床 CT 数据集中进行 BMD 测量。自动 BMD 测量在各种环境下都具有很高的可重复性。可靠的自动机会性骨质疏松症诊断可大规模应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reproducibility of CT-based opportunistic vertebral volumetric bone mineral density measurements from an automated segmentation framework.

Reproducibility of CT-based opportunistic vertebral volumetric bone mineral density measurements from an automated segmentation framework.

Background: To investigate the reproducibility of automated volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurements from routine thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) assessed with segmentations by a convolutional neural network and automated correction of contrast phases, on diverse scanners, with scanner-specific asynchronous or scanner-agnostic calibrations.

Methods: We obtained 679 observations from 278 CT scans in 121 patients (77 males, 63.6%) studied from 04/2019 to 06/2020. Observations consisted of two vBMD measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels (n = 169), Δcontrast phases (n = 133), scan Δsessions (n = 123), Δscanners (n = 63), or Δall of the aforementioned (n = 20), and observations lacking scanner-specific calibration (n = 171). Precision was assessed using root-mean-square error (RMSE) and root-mean-square coefficient of variation (RMSCV). Cross-measurement agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots; outliers within 95% confidence interval of the limits of agreement were reviewed.

Results: Repeated measurements from Δdifferent reconstruction kernels were highly precise (RMSE 3.0 mg/cm3; RMSCV 1.3%), even for consecutive scans with different Δcontrast phases (RMSCV 2.9%). Measurements from different Δscan sessions or Δscanners showed decreased precision (RMSCV 4.7% and 4.9%, respectively). Plot-review identified 12 outliers from different scan Δsessions, with signs of hydropic decompensation. Observations with Δall differences showed decreased precision compared to those lacking scanner-specific calibration (RMSCV 5.9 and 3.7, respectively).

Conclusion: Automatic vBMD assessment from routine CT is precise across varying setups, when calibrated appropriately. Low precision was found in patients with signs of new or worsening hydropic decompensation, what should be considered an exclusion criterion for both opportunistic and dedicated quantitative CT.

Relevance statement: Automated CT-based vBMD measurements are precise in various scenarios, including cross-session and cross-scanner settings, and may therefore facilitate opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and surveillance of BMD in patients undergoing routine clinical CT scans.

Key points: Artificial intelligence-based tools facilitate BMD measurements in routine clinical CT datasets. Automated BMD measurements are highly reproducible in various settings. Reliable, automated opportunistic osteoporosis diagnostics allow for large-scale application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信