用多模态神经成像解释昏迷后的恢复。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12591-y
Polona Pozeg, Jane Jöhr, John O Prior, Karin Diserens, Vincent Dunet
{"title":"用多模态神经成像解释昏迷后的恢复。","authors":"Polona Pozeg, Jane Jöhr, John O Prior, Karin Diserens, Vincent Dunet","doi":"10.1007/s00415-024-12591-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this prospective, observational cohort study was to investigate and assess diverse neuroimaging biomarkers to predict patients' neurological recovery after coma. 32 patients (18-76 years, M = 44.8, SD = 17.7) with disorders of consciousness participated in the study. Multimodal neuroimaging data acquired during the patient's hospitalization were used to derive cortical glucose metabolism (<sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography), and structural (diffusion-weighted imaging) and functional connectivity (resting-state functional MRI) indices. The recovery outcome was defined as a continuous composite score constructed from a multivariate neurobehavioral recovery assessment administered upon the discharge from the hospital. Fractional anisotropy-based white matter integrity in the anterior forebrain mesocircuit (r = 0.72, p < .001, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.45), and the functional connectivity between the antagonistic default mode and dorsal attention resting-state networks (r = - 0.74, p < 0.001, 95% CI: - 0.46, - 0.88) strongly correlated with the recovery outcome. The association between the posterior glucose metabolism and the recovery outcome was moderate (r = 0.38, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.02). Structural (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84, p = 0.003) or functional connectivity biomarker (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85, p = 0.001), but not their combination, significantly improved the model fit to predict the recovery compared solely to bedside neurobehavioral evaluation (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75). The present study elucidates an important role of specific MRI-derived structural and functional connectivity biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis of recovery after coma and has implications for clinical care of patients with severe brain injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining recovery from coma with multimodal neuroimaging.\",\"authors\":\"Polona Pozeg, Jane Jöhr, John O Prior, Karin Diserens, Vincent Dunet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-024-12591-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this prospective, observational cohort study was to investigate and assess diverse neuroimaging biomarkers to predict patients' neurological recovery after coma. 32 patients (18-76 years, M = 44.8, SD = 17.7) with disorders of consciousness participated in the study. Multimodal neuroimaging data acquired during the patient's hospitalization were used to derive cortical glucose metabolism (<sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography), and structural (diffusion-weighted imaging) and functional connectivity (resting-state functional MRI) indices. The recovery outcome was defined as a continuous composite score constructed from a multivariate neurobehavioral recovery assessment administered upon the discharge from the hospital. Fractional anisotropy-based white matter integrity in the anterior forebrain mesocircuit (r = 0.72, p < .001, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.45), and the functional connectivity between the antagonistic default mode and dorsal attention resting-state networks (r = - 0.74, p < 0.001, 95% CI: - 0.46, - 0.88) strongly correlated with the recovery outcome. The association between the posterior glucose metabolism and the recovery outcome was moderate (r = 0.38, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.02). Structural (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84, p = 0.003) or functional connectivity biomarker (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.85, p = 0.001), but not their combination, significantly improved the model fit to predict the recovery compared solely to bedside neurobehavioral evaluation (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75). The present study elucidates an important role of specific MRI-derived structural and functional connectivity biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis of recovery after coma and has implications for clinical care of patients with severe brain injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377522/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12591-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12591-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项前瞻性观察性队列研究旨在调查和评估各种神经影像生物标志物,以预测患者昏迷后的神经功能恢复情况。32 名意识障碍患者(18-76 岁,男 = 44.8,女 = 17.7)参与了这项研究。研究利用患者住院期间获得的多模态神经影像学数据,得出皮质葡萄糖代谢(18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描)、结构(弥散加权成像)和功能连接(静息态功能磁共振成像)指数。康复结果定义为出院时进行的多元神经行为康复评估所得出的连续性综合评分。与单纯的床旁神经行为评估(调整后 R2 = 0.75)相比,基于分数各向异性的前脑中枢回路白质完整性(r = 0.72,p 2 = 0.84,p = 0.003)或功能连接性生物标志物(调整后 R2 = 0.85,p = 0.001),但它们的组合并不能显著提高预测康复的模型拟合度。本研究阐明了特定核磁共振成像衍生结构和功能连接生物标志物在昏迷后恢复的诊断和预后中的重要作用,对重症脑损伤患者的临床治疗具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Explaining recovery from coma with multimodal neuroimaging.

Explaining recovery from coma with multimodal neuroimaging.

The aim of this prospective, observational cohort study was to investigate and assess diverse neuroimaging biomarkers to predict patients' neurological recovery after coma. 32 patients (18-76 years, M = 44.8, SD = 17.7) with disorders of consciousness participated in the study. Multimodal neuroimaging data acquired during the patient's hospitalization were used to derive cortical glucose metabolism (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography), and structural (diffusion-weighted imaging) and functional connectivity (resting-state functional MRI) indices. The recovery outcome was defined as a continuous composite score constructed from a multivariate neurobehavioral recovery assessment administered upon the discharge from the hospital. Fractional anisotropy-based white matter integrity in the anterior forebrain mesocircuit (r = 0.72, p < .001, 95% CI: 0.87, 0.45), and the functional connectivity between the antagonistic default mode and dorsal attention resting-state networks (r = - 0.74, p < 0.001, 95% CI: - 0.46, - 0.88) strongly correlated with the recovery outcome. The association between the posterior glucose metabolism and the recovery outcome was moderate (r = 0.38, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.02). Structural (adjusted R2 = 0.84, p = 0.003) or functional connectivity biomarker (adjusted R2 = 0.85, p = 0.001), but not their combination, significantly improved the model fit to predict the recovery compared solely to bedside neurobehavioral evaluation (adjusted R2 = 0.75). The present study elucidates an important role of specific MRI-derived structural and functional connectivity biomarkers in diagnosis and prognosis of recovery after coma and has implications for clinical care of patients with severe brain injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信