比较波罗的海和爱尔兰海 Cs-137 污染水平对底栖、底栖和中上层鱼类的影响。

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Pedro Nogueira , Ulrike Kammann , Stefanie A.K. Schmied , Marc-Oliver Aust
{"title":"比较波罗的海和爱尔兰海 Cs-137 污染水平对底栖、底栖和中上层鱼类的影响。","authors":"Pedro Nogueira ,&nbsp;Ulrike Kammann ,&nbsp;Stefanie A.K. Schmied ,&nbsp;Marc-Oliver Aust","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Irish Sea and the Baltic Sea are nowadays still the two most Cs-137 contaminated Seas worldwide. However, the origins of this contaminations are completely different. While the Baltic Sea was unintentionally contaminated due to global fallout after the accident in the Chernobyl nuclear powerplant in 1986, the Irish sea was intentionally used for low level liquid radioactive waste discharges from the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing facility (called Windscale until 1981) between the 1950s and 1990s. Nowadays, more than 30 years later, it is still possible to detect these contaminations in fish, water and sediments of both seas. Since fish are an important part of the human diet, monitoring Cs-137 levels in fish is essential for assessing the potential radiation exposure to humans. In 2019 and 2020 two surveys were dedicated to study the current levels of radioactive contamination in fish species from both Seas. During both surveys, fish samples were collected and analysed by gamma spectrometry later on. The results show that the average Cs-137 activity in benthic, demersal and pelagic fish species from the Baltic Sea are 2.7, 4.6 and 4.2, respectively, times higher than the corresponding values of the Irish Sea. Based on this and two other comparisons, it is concluded that the Baltic Sea is the most contaminated with Cs-137.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","volume":"278 ","pages":"Article 107510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X24001425/pdfft?md5=f3ece612e8f1f15709f26db39eeb8a01&pid=1-s2.0-S0265931X24001425-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the Baltic Sea and Irish Sea level of Cs-137 contamination on benthic, demersal and pelagic fish species\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Nogueira ,&nbsp;Ulrike Kammann ,&nbsp;Stefanie A.K. Schmied ,&nbsp;Marc-Oliver Aust\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Irish Sea and the Baltic Sea are nowadays still the two most Cs-137 contaminated Seas worldwide. However, the origins of this contaminations are completely different. While the Baltic Sea was unintentionally contaminated due to global fallout after the accident in the Chernobyl nuclear powerplant in 1986, the Irish sea was intentionally used for low level liquid radioactive waste discharges from the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing facility (called Windscale until 1981) between the 1950s and 1990s. Nowadays, more than 30 years later, it is still possible to detect these contaminations in fish, water and sediments of both seas. Since fish are an important part of the human diet, monitoring Cs-137 levels in fish is essential for assessing the potential radiation exposure to humans. In 2019 and 2020 two surveys were dedicated to study the current levels of radioactive contamination in fish species from both Seas. During both surveys, fish samples were collected and analysed by gamma spectrometry later on. The results show that the average Cs-137 activity in benthic, demersal and pelagic fish species from the Baltic Sea are 2.7, 4.6 and 4.2, respectively, times higher than the corresponding values of the Irish Sea. Based on this and two other comparisons, it is concluded that the Baltic Sea is the most contaminated with Cs-137.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"volume\":\"278 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X24001425/pdfft?md5=f3ece612e8f1f15709f26db39eeb8a01&pid=1-s2.0-S0265931X24001425-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental radioactivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X24001425\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental radioactivity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265931X24001425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,爱尔兰海和波罗的海仍然是全球受 Cs-137 污染最严重的两个海域。然而,这两种污染的起源却完全不同。波罗的海在 1986 年切尔诺贝利核电站事故后因全球沉降物而受到无意污染,而爱尔兰海则在 20 世纪 50 年代至 90 年代期间被有意用于塞拉菲尔德核后处理设施(1981 年之前称为温斯凯尔)的低浓度液态放射性废物排放。如今,30 多年过去了,在这两个海域的鱼类、水和沉积物中仍然可以检测到这些污染。由于鱼类是人类饮食的重要组成部分,监测鱼类中的 Cs-137 含量对于评估人类可能受到的辐射至关重要。2019 年和 2020 年进行了两次调查,专门研究这两个海域鱼类目前的放射性污染水平。在两次调查中,都采集了鱼类样本,随后用伽马能谱仪进行分析。结果显示,波罗的海底栖、底栖和中上层鱼类物种的平均铯-137 放射性活度分别是爱尔兰海相应数值的 2.7、4.6 和 4.2 倍。根据这一结果和其他两项比较,得出的结论是波罗的海受 Cs-137 污染最严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between the Baltic Sea and Irish Sea level of Cs-137 contamination on benthic, demersal and pelagic fish species

The Irish Sea and the Baltic Sea are nowadays still the two most Cs-137 contaminated Seas worldwide. However, the origins of this contaminations are completely different. While the Baltic Sea was unintentionally contaminated due to global fallout after the accident in the Chernobyl nuclear powerplant in 1986, the Irish sea was intentionally used for low level liquid radioactive waste discharges from the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing facility (called Windscale until 1981) between the 1950s and 1990s. Nowadays, more than 30 years later, it is still possible to detect these contaminations in fish, water and sediments of both seas. Since fish are an important part of the human diet, monitoring Cs-137 levels in fish is essential for assessing the potential radiation exposure to humans. In 2019 and 2020 two surveys were dedicated to study the current levels of radioactive contamination in fish species from both Seas. During both surveys, fish samples were collected and analysed by gamma spectrometry later on. The results show that the average Cs-137 activity in benthic, demersal and pelagic fish species from the Baltic Sea are 2.7, 4.6 and 4.2, respectively, times higher than the corresponding values of the Irish Sea. Based on this and two other comparisons, it is concluded that the Baltic Sea is the most contaminated with Cs-137.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental radioactivity
Journal of environmental radioactivity 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
73 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Radioactivity provides a coherent international forum for publication of original research or review papers on any aspect of the occurrence of radioactivity in natural systems. Relevant subject areas range from applications of environmental radionuclides as mechanistic or timescale tracers of natural processes to assessments of the radioecological or radiological effects of ambient radioactivity. Papers deal with naturally occurring nuclides or with those created and released by man through nuclear weapons manufacture and testing, energy production, fuel-cycle technology, etc. Reports on radioactivity in the oceans, sediments, rivers, lakes, groundwaters, soils, atmosphere and all divisions of the biosphere are welcomed, but these should not simply be of a monitoring nature unless the data are particularly innovative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信