注意力缺陷多动障碍和认知脱离综合症儿童与多动症和多动症合并对立违抗障碍儿童的心理因素和执行功能比较。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Attention Disorders Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/10870547241267379
Sevim Berrin Inci Izmir, Zekeriya Deniz Aktan, Eyüp Sabri Ercan
{"title":"注意力缺陷多动障碍和认知脱离综合症儿童与多动症和多动症合并对立违抗障碍儿童的心理因素和执行功能比较。","authors":"Sevim Berrin Inci Izmir, Zekeriya Deniz Aktan, Eyüp Sabri Ercan","doi":"10.1177/10870547241267379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to examine family functionality, emotion regulation difficulties, preference for loneliness, social exclusion, internalizing and externalizing disorders, and executive functions in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (CDS) and compare with ADHD, and ADHD+ Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included 842 children aged 8-12 years. The subjects were categorized according to DSM-V as ADHD (<i>n</i> = 246), ADHD + ODD (<i>n</i> = 212), ADHD + CDS (<i>n</i> = 176), and Control group (<i>n</i> = 207). The solitude and social exclusion, difficulties in emotion dysregulation and Barkley SCT scales, Child Behavior Checklist, family assessment device, and Central Vital Signs (CNSVS) test were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the study, children with ADHD + CDS had higher rates of internalizing disorders. They also preferred being alone and experienced more difficulty communicating with their parents and solving problems within the family. Additionally, these children had difficulty recognizing and understanding the emotional reactions of others. The ADHD + ODD group presented a poorer performance on CNSVS domain tests except for the psychomotor speed test than other groups. Also, ADHD + CDS children had the lowest psychomotor speed scores and lower scores on reaction time and cognitive flexibility than pure ADHD children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will contribute to the etiology, treatment, and clinical discrimination of ADHD + CDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1555-1576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of Psychological Factors and Executive Functions of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome to ADHD and ADHD Comorbid with Oppositional Defiant Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Sevim Berrin Inci Izmir, Zekeriya Deniz Aktan, Eyüp Sabri Ercan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10870547241267379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to examine family functionality, emotion regulation difficulties, preference for loneliness, social exclusion, internalizing and externalizing disorders, and executive functions in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (CDS) and compare with ADHD, and ADHD+ Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included 842 children aged 8-12 years. The subjects were categorized according to DSM-V as ADHD (<i>n</i> = 246), ADHD + ODD (<i>n</i> = 212), ADHD + CDS (<i>n</i> = 176), and Control group (<i>n</i> = 207). The solitude and social exclusion, difficulties in emotion dysregulation and Barkley SCT scales, Child Behavior Checklist, family assessment device, and Central Vital Signs (CNSVS) test were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the study, children with ADHD + CDS had higher rates of internalizing disorders. They also preferred being alone and experienced more difficulty communicating with their parents and solving problems within the family. Additionally, these children had difficulty recognizing and understanding the emotional reactions of others. The ADHD + ODD group presented a poorer performance on CNSVS domain tests except for the psychomotor speed test than other groups. Also, ADHD + CDS children had the lowest psychomotor speed scores and lower scores on reaction time and cognitive flexibility than pure ADHD children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study will contribute to the etiology, treatment, and clinical discrimination of ADHD + CDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1555-1576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Attention Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547241267379\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547241267379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在考察注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和认知脱离综合征(CDS)儿童的家庭功能、情绪调节困难、孤独偏好、社会排斥、内化和外化障碍以及执行功能,并与ADHD和ADHD+对立违抗障碍(ODD)进行比较:本研究包括 842 名 8-12 岁的儿童。根据 DSM-V 将受试者分为多动症组(246 人)、多动症+对立违抗障碍组(212 人)、多动症+CDS 组(176 人)和对照组(207 人)。研究使用了孤独和社交排斥、情绪调节困难和巴克利 SCT 量表、儿童行为检查表、家庭评估装置和中央生命体征(CNSVS)测试:研究发现,患有多动症+CDS 的儿童内化障碍发生率较高。他们还喜欢独处,在与父母沟通和解决家庭问题方面遇到更多困难。此外,这些儿童很难识别和理解他人的情绪反应。除精神运动速度测试外,ADHD + ODD 组在 CNSVS 领域测试中的表现不如其他组。此外,ADHD + CDS 儿童的精神运动速度得分最低,反应时间和认知灵活性得分也低于纯 ADHD 儿童:本研究将有助于ADHD + CDS的病因学、治疗和临床鉴别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparison of Psychological Factors and Executive Functions of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome to ADHD and ADHD Comorbid with Oppositional Defiant Disorder.

Objective: The study aims to examine family functionality, emotion regulation difficulties, preference for loneliness, social exclusion, internalizing and externalizing disorders, and executive functions in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (CDS) and compare with ADHD, and ADHD+ Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD).

Method: This study included 842 children aged 8-12 years. The subjects were categorized according to DSM-V as ADHD (n = 246), ADHD + ODD (n = 212), ADHD + CDS (n = 176), and Control group (n = 207). The solitude and social exclusion, difficulties in emotion dysregulation and Barkley SCT scales, Child Behavior Checklist, family assessment device, and Central Vital Signs (CNSVS) test were used.

Results: According to the study, children with ADHD + CDS had higher rates of internalizing disorders. They also preferred being alone and experienced more difficulty communicating with their parents and solving problems within the family. Additionally, these children had difficulty recognizing and understanding the emotional reactions of others. The ADHD + ODD group presented a poorer performance on CNSVS domain tests except for the psychomotor speed test than other groups. Also, ADHD + CDS children had the lowest psychomotor speed scores and lower scores on reaction time and cognitive flexibility than pure ADHD children.

Conclusion: This study will contribute to the etiology, treatment, and clinical discrimination of ADHD + CDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信