Marco Lombardi MD, Rocco Vergallo MD, PhD, Andrea Costantino MD, Francesco Bianchini MD, Tsunekazu Kakuta MD, PhD, Tomasz Pawlowski MD, PhD, Antonio M. Leone MD, PhD, Gennaro Sardella MD, PhD, Pierfrancesco Agostoni MD, PhD, Jonathan M. Hill MD, Giovanni L. De Maria MD, PhD, Adrian P. Banning MD, Tomasz Roleder MD, PhD, Anouar Belkacemi MD, PhD, Carlo Trani MD, Francesco Burzotta MD, PhD
{"title":"开发用于血管造影冠状动脉中间病变分数血流储备预测的机器学习模型。","authors":"Marco Lombardi MD, Rocco Vergallo MD, PhD, Andrea Costantino MD, Francesco Bianchini MD, Tsunekazu Kakuta MD, PhD, Tomasz Pawlowski MD, PhD, Antonio M. Leone MD, PhD, Gennaro Sardella MD, PhD, Pierfrancesco Agostoni MD, PhD, Jonathan M. Hill MD, Giovanni L. De Maria MD, PhD, Adrian P. Banning MD, Tomasz Roleder MD, PhD, Anouar Belkacemi MD, PhD, Carlo Trani MD, Francesco Burzotta MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) represents the gold standard in guiding the decision to proceed or not with coronary revascularization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesion (AICL). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows to carefully characterize coronary plaque morphology and lumen dimensions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We sought to develop machine learning (ML) models based on clinical, angiographic and OCT variables for predicting FFR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from a multicenter, international, pooled analysis of individual patient's level data from published studies assessing FFR and OCT on the same target AICL were collected through a dedicated database to train (<i>n</i> = 351) and validate (<i>n</i> = 151) six two-class supervised ML models employing 25 clinical, angiographic and OCT variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 502 coronary lesions in 489 patients were included. The AUC of the six ML models ranged from 0.71 to 0.78, whereas the measured F1 score was from 0.70 to 0.75. The ML algorithms showed moderate sensitivity (range: 0.68–0.77) and specificity (range: 0.59–0.69) in detecting patients with a positive or negative FFR. In the sensitivity analysis, using 0.75 as FFR cut-off, we found a higher AUC (0.78–0.86) and a similar F1 score (range: 0.63–0.76). Specifically, the six ML models showed a higher specificity (0.71–0.84), with a similar sensitivity (0.58–0.80) with respect to 0.80 cut-off.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ML algorithms derived from clinical, angiographic, and OCT parameters can identify patients with a positive or negative FFR.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.31167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of machine learning models for fractional flow reserve prediction in angiographically intermediate coronary lesions\",\"authors\":\"Marco Lombardi MD, Rocco Vergallo MD, PhD, Andrea Costantino MD, Francesco Bianchini MD, Tsunekazu Kakuta MD, PhD, Tomasz Pawlowski MD, PhD, Antonio M. Leone MD, PhD, Gennaro Sardella MD, PhD, Pierfrancesco Agostoni MD, PhD, Jonathan M. Hill MD, Giovanni L. De Maria MD, PhD, Adrian P. Banning MD, Tomasz Roleder MD, PhD, Anouar Belkacemi MD, PhD, Carlo Trani MD, Francesco Burzotta MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) represents the gold standard in guiding the decision to proceed or not with coronary revascularization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesion (AICL). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows to carefully characterize coronary plaque morphology and lumen dimensions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>We sought to develop machine learning (ML) models based on clinical, angiographic and OCT variables for predicting FFR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from a multicenter, international, pooled analysis of individual patient's level data from published studies assessing FFR and OCT on the same target AICL were collected through a dedicated database to train (<i>n</i> = 351) and validate (<i>n</i> = 151) six two-class supervised ML models employing 25 clinical, angiographic and OCT variables.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 502 coronary lesions in 489 patients were included. The AUC of the six ML models ranged from 0.71 to 0.78, whereas the measured F1 score was from 0.70 to 0.75. The ML algorithms showed moderate sensitivity (range: 0.68–0.77) and specificity (range: 0.59–0.69) in detecting patients with a positive or negative FFR. In the sensitivity analysis, using 0.75 as FFR cut-off, we found a higher AUC (0.78–0.86) and a similar F1 score (range: 0.63–0.76). Specifically, the six ML models showed a higher specificity (0.71–0.84), with a similar sensitivity (0.58–0.80) with respect to 0.80 cut-off.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>ML algorithms derived from clinical, angiographic, and OCT parameters can identify patients with a positive or negative FFR.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ccd.31167\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:分数血流储备(FFR)是指导决定是否对血管造影中级冠状动脉病变(AICL)进行冠状动脉血运重建的黄金标准。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)可以仔细描述冠状动脉斑块的形态和管腔尺寸:我们试图开发基于临床、血管造影和 OCT 变量的机器学习(ML)模型,用于预测 FFR:我们通过一个专门的数据库收集了来自多中心、国际性、对已发表的研究中评估同一目标 AICL 的 FFR 和 OCT 的单个患者水平数据的汇总分析数据,利用 25 个临床、血管造影和 OCT 变量训练(n = 351)和验证(n = 151)了六个两类有监督的 ML 模型:结果:共纳入了 489 名患者的 502 个冠状动脉病变。六个 ML 模型的 AUC 在 0.71 到 0.78 之间,而测量的 F1 分数在 0.70 到 0.75 之间。ML 算法在检测 FFR 阳性或阴性患者方面显示出中等的敏感性(范围:0.68-0.77)和特异性(范围:0.59-0.69)。在敏感性分析中,以 0.75 作为 FFR 临界值,我们发现 AUC 较高(0.78-0.86),F1 分数相似(范围:0.63-0.76)。具体而言,与 0.80 临界值相比,六个 ML 模型显示出更高的特异性(0.71-0.84)和相似的灵敏度(0.58-0.80):结论:根据临床、血管造影和 OCT 参数得出的 ML 算法可以识别 FFR 为阳性或阴性的患者。
Development of machine learning models for fractional flow reserve prediction in angiographically intermediate coronary lesions
Background
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) represents the gold standard in guiding the decision to proceed or not with coronary revascularization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesion (AICL). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows to carefully characterize coronary plaque morphology and lumen dimensions.
Objectives
We sought to develop machine learning (ML) models based on clinical, angiographic and OCT variables for predicting FFR.
Methods
Data from a multicenter, international, pooled analysis of individual patient's level data from published studies assessing FFR and OCT on the same target AICL were collected through a dedicated database to train (n = 351) and validate (n = 151) six two-class supervised ML models employing 25 clinical, angiographic and OCT variables.
Results
A total of 502 coronary lesions in 489 patients were included. The AUC of the six ML models ranged from 0.71 to 0.78, whereas the measured F1 score was from 0.70 to 0.75. The ML algorithms showed moderate sensitivity (range: 0.68–0.77) and specificity (range: 0.59–0.69) in detecting patients with a positive or negative FFR. In the sensitivity analysis, using 0.75 as FFR cut-off, we found a higher AUC (0.78–0.86) and a similar F1 score (range: 0.63–0.76). Specifically, the six ML models showed a higher specificity (0.71–0.84), with a similar sensitivity (0.58–0.80) with respect to 0.80 cut-off.
Conclusions
ML algorithms derived from clinical, angiographic, and OCT parameters can identify patients with a positive or negative FFR.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.