2型糖尿病患者通过症状和NT-proBNP筛查心衰的诊断算法中的性别差异。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sarah Hofer-Zeni, Michael Leutner, Peter Klimek, Luise Bellach, Noemi Pavo, Suriya Prausmüller, Martin Hülsmann, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者通过症状和NT-proBNP筛查心衰的诊断算法中的性别差异。","authors":"Sarah Hofer-Zeni, Michael Leutner, Peter Klimek, Luise Bellach, Noemi Pavo, Suriya Prausmüller, Martin Hülsmann, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer","doi":"10.1186/s12933-024-02360-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the guideline recommended diagnostic tools NT-proBNP and NYHA classification, with a focus on sex-specific differences.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) face a heart failure (HF) risk up to four times higher than those without T2D, particularly affecting women more than twice as much as men. Despite distinct pathophysiological differences between men and women, there are currently no sex-specific recommendations for the diagnostic algorithm of HF in diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2083 patients with T2D were enrolled, and the primary endpoint was heart failure during hospitalization within a 5-year timeframe. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In female patients, frequency of HF diagnosis prior to or during hospitalization and mortality did not differ significantly between NYHA II and III, in contrast to male patients. Additionally, there was no notable difference in mean NT-proBNP levels between NYHA stage II and III only in female patients. The multivariable regression analysis highlighted NYHA classification not to be a predictor of NT-proBNP levels in female but solely in male patients. On multivariable Cox regression NYHA score was also no significant risk factor for occurence of HF in female patients. Furthermore, there was no significant disparity in mortality between men with NT-proBNP levels between 125 and 400 pg/ml and those below 125 pg/ml, whereas in women mortality was significantly higher in the group with NT-proBNP levels between 125 and 400 pg/ml than below 125 pg/ml.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that NYHA classification may not be the most suitable tool for assessing the diagnosis of HF in female patients with T2D. Moreover, the need for consideration of a more symptom-independent screening for HF in female patients with T2D and re-evaluation of current guidelines especially regarding sex-specific aspects is highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in the diagnostic algorithm of screening for heart failure by symptoms and NT-proBNP in patients with type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Hofer-Zeni, Michael Leutner, Peter Klimek, Luise Bellach, Noemi Pavo, Suriya Prausmüller, Martin Hülsmann, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12933-024-02360-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the guideline recommended diagnostic tools NT-proBNP and NYHA classification, with a focus on sex-specific differences.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) face a heart failure (HF) risk up to four times higher than those without T2D, particularly affecting women more than twice as much as men. Despite distinct pathophysiological differences between men and women, there are currently no sex-specific recommendations for the diagnostic algorithm of HF in diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2083 patients with T2D were enrolled, and the primary endpoint was heart failure during hospitalization within a 5-year timeframe. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In female patients, frequency of HF diagnosis prior to or during hospitalization and mortality did not differ significantly between NYHA II and III, in contrast to male patients. Additionally, there was no notable difference in mean NT-proBNP levels between NYHA stage II and III only in female patients. The multivariable regression analysis highlighted NYHA classification not to be a predictor of NT-proBNP levels in female but solely in male patients. On multivariable Cox regression NYHA score was also no significant risk factor for occurence of HF in female patients. Furthermore, there was no significant disparity in mortality between men with NT-proBNP levels between 125 and 400 pg/ml and those below 125 pg/ml, whereas in women mortality was significantly higher in the group with NT-proBNP levels between 125 and 400 pg/ml than below 125 pg/ml.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that NYHA classification may not be the most suitable tool for assessing the diagnosis of HF in female patients with T2D. Moreover, the need for consideration of a more symptom-independent screening for HF in female patients with T2D and re-evaluation of current guidelines especially regarding sex-specific aspects is highlighted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Diabetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02360-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02360-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估指南推荐的诊断工具 NT-proBNP 和 NYHA 分级,重点关注性别差异:本研究旨在评估指南推荐的诊断工具 NT-proBNP 和 NYHA 分级,重点关注性别差异:背景:2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的心力衰竭(HF)风险是非 T2D 患者的四倍,尤其是女性患者是男性患者的两倍多。尽管男性和女性在病理生理方面存在明显差异,但目前还没有针对不同性别的糖尿病患者心力衰竭诊断算法的建议:方法:共招募了 2083 名 T2D 患者,主要终点是 5 年住院期间的心力衰竭。次要终点是全因死亡:与男性患者相比,女性患者在住院前或住院期间被诊断为心力衰竭的频率和死亡率在 NYHA II 和 III 之间没有显著差异。此外,仅在女性患者中,NT-proBNP 的平均水平在 NYHA II 期和 III 期之间没有明显差异。多变量回归分析显示,NYHA 分级并不能预测女性患者的 NT-proBNP 水平,而只能预测男性患者的 NT-proBNP 水平。在多变量 Cox 回归中,NYHA 评分也不是女性患者发生 HF 的重要风险因素。此外,NT-proBNP 水平介于 125 和 400 pg/ml 之间的男性患者与低于 125 pg/ml 的男性患者之间的死亡率没有明显差异,而 NT-proBNP 水平介于 125 和 400 pg/ml 之间的女性患者的死亡率明显高于低于 125 pg/ml 的女性患者:这些研究结果表明,NYHA 分级可能不是评估诊断女性 T2D 患者是否患有 HF 的最合适工具。此外,有必要考虑对 T2D 女性患者进行更多与症状无关的心房颤动筛查,并对现行指南进行重新评估,尤其是在性别特异性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in the diagnostic algorithm of screening for heart failure by symptoms and NT-proBNP in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the guideline recommended diagnostic tools NT-proBNP and NYHA classification, with a focus on sex-specific differences.

Background: Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) face a heart failure (HF) risk up to four times higher than those without T2D, particularly affecting women more than twice as much as men. Despite distinct pathophysiological differences between men and women, there are currently no sex-specific recommendations for the diagnostic algorithm of HF in diabetic patients.

Methods: A total of 2083 patients with T2D were enrolled, and the primary endpoint was heart failure during hospitalization within a 5-year timeframe. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death.

Results: In female patients, frequency of HF diagnosis prior to or during hospitalization and mortality did not differ significantly between NYHA II and III, in contrast to male patients. Additionally, there was no notable difference in mean NT-proBNP levels between NYHA stage II and III only in female patients. The multivariable regression analysis highlighted NYHA classification not to be a predictor of NT-proBNP levels in female but solely in male patients. On multivariable Cox regression NYHA score was also no significant risk factor for occurence of HF in female patients. Furthermore, there was no significant disparity in mortality between men with NT-proBNP levels between 125 and 400 pg/ml and those below 125 pg/ml, whereas in women mortality was significantly higher in the group with NT-proBNP levels between 125 and 400 pg/ml than below 125 pg/ml.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that NYHA classification may not be the most suitable tool for assessing the diagnosis of HF in female patients with T2D. Moreover, the need for consideration of a more symptom-independent screening for HF in female patients with T2D and re-evaluation of current guidelines especially regarding sex-specific aspects is highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信