区分低风险胸腺瘤和高风险胸腺瘤:基于造影剂增强 CT 的术前放射组学提名图,以尽量减少不必要的侵入性开胸手术。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chao Gao, Liping Yang, Yuchao Xu, Tianzuo Wang, Hongchao Ding, Xing Gao, Lin Li
{"title":"区分低风险胸腺瘤和高风险胸腺瘤:基于造影剂增强 CT 的术前放射组学提名图,以尽量减少不必要的侵入性开胸手术。","authors":"Chao Gao, Liping Yang, Yuchao Xu, Tianzuo Wang, Hongchao Ding, Xing Gao, Lin Li","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01367-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed to develop a combined radiomics nomogram to preoperatively predict the risk categorization of thymomas based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) images.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>The clinical and CT data of 178 patients with thymoma (100 patients with low-risk thymomas and 78 patients with high-risk thymomas) collected in our hospital from March 2018 to July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 125) and a validation set (n = 53) in a 7:3 ratio. Qualitative radiological features were recorded, including (a) tumor diameter, (b) location, (c) shape, (d) capsule integrity, (e) calcification, (f) necrosis, (g) fatty infiltration, (h) lymphadenopathy, and (i) enhanced CT value. Radiomics features were extracted from each CE-CT volume of interest (VOI), and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was performed to select the optimal discriminative ones. A combined radiomics nomogram was further established based on the clinical factors and radiomics scores. The differentiating efficacy was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only one clinical factor (incomplete capsule) and seven radiomics features were found to be independent predictors and were used to establish the radiomics nomogram. In differentiating low-risk thymomas (types A, AB, and B1) from high-risk ones (types B2 and B3), the nomogram demonstrated better diagnostic efficacy than any single model, with the respective area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.974, 0.921, 0.962 and 0.900 in the training cohort, 0.960, 0.892, 0923 and 0.897 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the prediction probability and actual clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nomogram incorporating clinical factors and radiomics features provides additional value in differentiating the risk categorization of thymomas, which could potentially be useful in clinical practice for planning personalized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating low-risk thymomas from high-risk thymomas: preoperative radiomics nomogram based on contrast enhanced CT to minimize unnecessary invasive thoracotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Chao Gao, Liping Yang, Yuchao Xu, Tianzuo Wang, Hongchao Ding, Xing Gao, Lin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-024-01367-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed to develop a combined radiomics nomogram to preoperatively predict the risk categorization of thymomas based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) images.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>The clinical and CT data of 178 patients with thymoma (100 patients with low-risk thymomas and 78 patients with high-risk thymomas) collected in our hospital from March 2018 to July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 125) and a validation set (n = 53) in a 7:3 ratio. Qualitative radiological features were recorded, including (a) tumor diameter, (b) location, (c) shape, (d) capsule integrity, (e) calcification, (f) necrosis, (g) fatty infiltration, (h) lymphadenopathy, and (i) enhanced CT value. Radiomics features were extracted from each CE-CT volume of interest (VOI), and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was performed to select the optimal discriminative ones. A combined radiomics nomogram was further established based on the clinical factors and radiomics scores. The differentiating efficacy was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only one clinical factor (incomplete capsule) and seven radiomics features were found to be independent predictors and were used to establish the radiomics nomogram. In differentiating low-risk thymomas (types A, AB, and B1) from high-risk ones (types B2 and B3), the nomogram demonstrated better diagnostic efficacy than any single model, with the respective area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.974, 0.921, 0.962 and 0.900 in the training cohort, 0.960, 0.892, 0923 and 0.897 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the prediction probability and actual clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The nomogram incorporating clinical factors and radiomics features provides additional value in differentiating the risk categorization of thymomas, which could potentially be useful in clinical practice for planning personalized treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295358/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01367-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01367-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在开发一种基于对比增强计算机断层扫描(CE-CT)图像的综合放射组学提名图,以预测胸腺瘤的术前风险分类:本研究旨在根据造影剂增强计算机断层扫描(CE-CT)图像,开发一种联合放射组学提名图,用于术前预测胸腺瘤的风险分类:回顾性分析我院自2018年3月至2023年7月收集的178例胸腺瘤患者(低危胸腺瘤患者100例,高危胸腺瘤患者78例)的临床和CT数据。患者按 7:3 的比例随机分为训练集(n = 125)和验证集(n = 53)。记录的定性放射学特征包括:(a)肿瘤直径;(b)位置;(c)形状;(d)囊完整性;(e)钙化;(f)坏死;(g)脂肪浸润;(h)淋巴结病;(i)增强 CT 值。从每个 CE-CT 感兴趣容积(VOI)中提取放射组学特征,并采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)算法来选择最佳判别特征。根据临床因素和放射组学评分,进一步建立了综合放射组学提名图。采用接收器操作特征(ROC)分析法确定其分辨功效:结果:只有一个临床因素(不完全囊)和七个放射组学特征被认为是独立的预测因素,并被用于建立放射组学提名图。在区分低危胸腺瘤(A型、AB型和B1型)和高危胸腺瘤(B2型和B3型)时,提名图比任何单一模型都具有更好的诊断效果,训练队列的曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.974、0.921、0.962和0.900,验证队列的曲线下面积、准确性、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.960、0.892、0923和0.897。校准曲线显示,预测概率与实际临床结果之间具有良好的一致性:结合临床因素和放射组学特征的提名图为区分胸腺瘤的风险分类提供了额外的价值,有可能在临床实践中用于规划个性化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiating low-risk thymomas from high-risk thymomas: preoperative radiomics nomogram based on contrast enhanced CT to minimize unnecessary invasive thoracotomy.

Background: This study was designed to develop a combined radiomics nomogram to preoperatively predict the risk categorization of thymomas based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) images.

Materials: The clinical and CT data of 178 patients with thymoma (100 patients with low-risk thymomas and 78 patients with high-risk thymomas) collected in our hospital from March 2018 to July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 125) and a validation set (n = 53) in a 7:3 ratio. Qualitative radiological features were recorded, including (a) tumor diameter, (b) location, (c) shape, (d) capsule integrity, (e) calcification, (f) necrosis, (g) fatty infiltration, (h) lymphadenopathy, and (i) enhanced CT value. Radiomics features were extracted from each CE-CT volume of interest (VOI), and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was performed to select the optimal discriminative ones. A combined radiomics nomogram was further established based on the clinical factors and radiomics scores. The differentiating efficacy was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: Only one clinical factor (incomplete capsule) and seven radiomics features were found to be independent predictors and were used to establish the radiomics nomogram. In differentiating low-risk thymomas (types A, AB, and B1) from high-risk ones (types B2 and B3), the nomogram demonstrated better diagnostic efficacy than any single model, with the respective area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.974, 0.921, 0.962 and 0.900 in the training cohort, 0.960, 0.892, 0923 and 0.897 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the prediction probability and actual clinical findings.

Conclusions: The nomogram incorporating clinical factors and radiomics features provides additional value in differentiating the risk categorization of thymomas, which could potentially be useful in clinical practice for planning personalized treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信