回避型、焦虑型和安全型依恋风格个体的苦恼与舒适的神经相关性:fMRI 研究。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Attachment & Human Development Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1080/14616734.2024.2384393
Alexandre Comte, Monika Szymanska, Julie Monnin, Thierry Moulin, Sylvie Nezelof, Eloi Magnin, Renaud Jardri, Lauriane Vulliez-Coady
{"title":"回避型、焦虑型和安全型依恋风格个体的苦恼与舒适的神经相关性:fMRI 研究。","authors":"Alexandre Comte, Monika Szymanska, Julie Monnin, Thierry Moulin, Sylvie Nezelof, Eloi Magnin, Renaud Jardri, Lauriane Vulliez-Coady","doi":"10.1080/14616734.2024.2384393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a growing literature, experiments directly related to attachment are still needed. We explored brain processes involved in two aspects of attachment, distress and comfort. Seventy-eight healthy adult males with different attachment styles (secure, avoidant, and anxious) viewed distress, comfort, complicity-joy and neutral images (picture database BAPS-Adult) in an fMRI block design. ROIs from the modules described in the functional Neuro-Anatomical Model of Attachment (Long et al. 2020) were studied. Secure participants used more co- and self-regulation strategies and exhibited a higher activation of the reward network in distress and comfort viewing, than insecure participants. Avoidant participants showed the lower brain activations. Their approach and reward modules were the least activated in distress and comfort. Anxious participants presented both higher activations of the approach and aversion modules during complicity-joy. In addition, comfort and complicity-joy were processed differently according to attachment styles and should be differentiated among positive stimuli to disentangle attachment processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8632,"journal":{"name":"Attachment & Human Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural correlates of distress and comfort in individuals with avoidant, anxious and secure attachment style: an fMRI study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Comte, Monika Szymanska, Julie Monnin, Thierry Moulin, Sylvie Nezelof, Eloi Magnin, Renaud Jardri, Lauriane Vulliez-Coady\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14616734.2024.2384393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite a growing literature, experiments directly related to attachment are still needed. We explored brain processes involved in two aspects of attachment, distress and comfort. Seventy-eight healthy adult males with different attachment styles (secure, avoidant, and anxious) viewed distress, comfort, complicity-joy and neutral images (picture database BAPS-Adult) in an fMRI block design. ROIs from the modules described in the functional Neuro-Anatomical Model of Attachment (Long et al. 2020) were studied. Secure participants used more co- and self-regulation strategies and exhibited a higher activation of the reward network in distress and comfort viewing, than insecure participants. Avoidant participants showed the lower brain activations. Their approach and reward modules were the least activated in distress and comfort. Anxious participants presented both higher activations of the approach and aversion modules during complicity-joy. In addition, comfort and complicity-joy were processed differently according to attachment styles and should be differentiated among positive stimuli to disentangle attachment processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attachment & Human Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attachment & Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2024.2384393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attachment & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2024.2384393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管相关文献越来越多,但与依恋直接相关的实验仍然需要。我们探索了与依恋的两个方面--苦恼和舒适--有关的大脑过程。78名具有不同依恋风格(安全型、回避型和焦虑型)的健康成年男性在fMRI分块设计中观看了痛苦、舒适、共谋-快乐和中性图片(图片数据库BAPS-Adult)。研究了依恋的功能神经解剖模型(Long 等人,2020 年)中描述的模块的 ROI。与缺乏安全感的参与者相比,安全感强的参与者使用了更多的共同和自我调节策略,并在苦恼和舒适观看时表现出更高的奖赏网络激活。回避型参与者的大脑激活程度较低。他们的接近和奖赏模块在苦恼和舒适中的激活程度最低。焦虑型参与者在共谋-快乐时,接近和厌恶模块的激活率都较高。此外,舒适和共谋-快乐根据依恋风格的不同而有不同的处理方式,因此应在积极刺激中加以区分,以区分依恋过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neural correlates of distress and comfort in individuals with avoidant, anxious and secure attachment style: an fMRI study.

Despite a growing literature, experiments directly related to attachment are still needed. We explored brain processes involved in two aspects of attachment, distress and comfort. Seventy-eight healthy adult males with different attachment styles (secure, avoidant, and anxious) viewed distress, comfort, complicity-joy and neutral images (picture database BAPS-Adult) in an fMRI block design. ROIs from the modules described in the functional Neuro-Anatomical Model of Attachment (Long et al. 2020) were studied. Secure participants used more co- and self-regulation strategies and exhibited a higher activation of the reward network in distress and comfort viewing, than insecure participants. Avoidant participants showed the lower brain activations. Their approach and reward modules were the least activated in distress and comfort. Anxious participants presented both higher activations of the approach and aversion modules during complicity-joy. In addition, comfort and complicity-joy were processed differently according to attachment styles and should be differentiated among positive stimuli to disentangle attachment processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Attachment & Human Development
Attachment & Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Attachment & Human Development is the leading forum for the presentation of empirical research, reviews and clinical case studies that reflect contemporary advances in attachment theory and research. The journal addresses the growing demand from the domains of psychology, psychiatry, psychotherapy and related disciplines including nursing and social work, for a clear presentation of ideas, methods and research based on attachment theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信