在湿地地表高程变化分析中纳入陆地垂直运动测量数据

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Philippe Hensel, Donald R. Cahoon, Glenn Guntenspergen, Laura Mitchell, Matt Whitbeck, Galen Scott
{"title":"在湿地地表高程变化分析中纳入陆地垂直运动测量数据","authors":"Philippe Hensel, Donald R. Cahoon, Glenn Guntenspergen, Laura Mitchell, Matt Whitbeck, Galen Scott","doi":"10.1007/s12237-024-01406-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We compared elevation trajectories from 14 rod surface elevation table (RSET) stations and 60 real-time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS) transects within the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge (BNWR) from 2010–2013. The results were similar, 7.3 ± 0.9 (mean ± standard error; RSET) versus 6.2 ± 0.6 mm year<sup>−1</sup> (RTK) (<i>P</i> = 0.216), and were greater than relative sea level rise (RSLR) computed at the nearest long-term tide station (3.9 ± 0.29 mm year<sup>−1</sup>). Despite having shown elevation gain, these wetlands continue to drown and convert to open water. Episodic, multi-day GPS measurements on geodetic control marks at BNWR between 2005 and 2023 revealed a substantial vertical land motion (VLM) signal. From 2005 to 2015, three reference marks used to control the 2010–2013 RTK study lost on average 6.0 ± 0.7 mm year<sup>−1</sup>, corresponding to 80% and 94% of the elevation gain measured by the RSET and RTK techniques, respectively. The longer 18-year subsidence trend measured on one of these marks was lower, 3.9 ± 0.7 mm year<sup>−1</sup>, highlighting important interannual variability. Wetland elevation change measurements need to account for VLM occurring below the reference marks used to measure elevation change. Estimates from the nearest long-term tide station may not be applicable to the wetland if the tide station is in a different geological setting. At BNWR, VLM was higher than the VLM at the Cambridge tide station, which helps explain why wetlands at BNWR are not keeping pace with RSLR despite the measured high rates of elevation gain.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incorporating Measurements of Vertical Land Motion in Wetland Surface Elevation Change Analyses\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Hensel, Donald R. Cahoon, Glenn Guntenspergen, Laura Mitchell, Matt Whitbeck, Galen Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12237-024-01406-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We compared elevation trajectories from 14 rod surface elevation table (RSET) stations and 60 real-time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS) transects within the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge (BNWR) from 2010–2013. The results were similar, 7.3 ± 0.9 (mean ± standard error; RSET) versus 6.2 ± 0.6 mm year<sup>−1</sup> (RTK) (<i>P</i> = 0.216), and were greater than relative sea level rise (RSLR) computed at the nearest long-term tide station (3.9 ± 0.29 mm year<sup>−1</sup>). Despite having shown elevation gain, these wetlands continue to drown and convert to open water. Episodic, multi-day GPS measurements on geodetic control marks at BNWR between 2005 and 2023 revealed a substantial vertical land motion (VLM) signal. From 2005 to 2015, three reference marks used to control the 2010–2013 RTK study lost on average 6.0 ± 0.7 mm year<sup>−1</sup>, corresponding to 80% and 94% of the elevation gain measured by the RSET and RTK techniques, respectively. The longer 18-year subsidence trend measured on one of these marks was lower, 3.9 ± 0.7 mm year<sup>−1</sup>, highlighting important interannual variability. Wetland elevation change measurements need to account for VLM occurring below the reference marks used to measure elevation change. Estimates from the nearest long-term tide station may not be applicable to the wetland if the tide station is in a different geological setting. At BNWR, VLM was higher than the VLM at the Cambridge tide station, which helps explain why wetlands at BNWR are not keeping pace with RSLR despite the measured high rates of elevation gain.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01406-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01406-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们比较了 2010-2013 年黑水国家野生动物保护区 (BNWR) 内 14 个杆表高程表 (RSET) 站和 60 个实时运动学 (RTK) 全球定位系统 (GPS) 断面的海拔轨迹。结果相似,分别为 7.3 ± 0.9(平均值 ± 标准误差;RSET)和 6.2 ± 0.6 mm year-1(RTK)(P = 0.216),且高于最近的长期潮汐站计算的相对海平面上升(RSLR)(3.9 ± 0.29 mm year-1)。尽管海拔有所上升,但这些湿地仍在继续淹没并转化为开阔水域。2005 年至 2023 年期间,对 BNWR 的大地测量控制点进行的偶发性、多日 GPS 测量显示了大量的垂直陆地运动(VLM)信号。从 2005 年到 2015 年,用于控制 2010-2013 年 RTK 研究的三个基准点平均每年下沉 6.0 ± 0.7 毫米,分别相当于 RSET 和 RTK 技术所测高程增量的 80% 和 94%。在其中一个标记上测量到的更长的 18 年沉降趋势则更低,为 3.9 ± 0.7 毫米/年,凸显了重要的年际变化。湿地高程变化测量需要考虑用于测量高程变化的参考点下方发生的 VLM。如果潮汐站处于不同的地质环境中,则最近的长期潮汐站的估算值可能不适用于湿地。在 BNWR,VLM 高于剑桥潮汐站的 VLM,这有助于解释为什么 BNWR 的湿地尽管测得了较高的海拔上升率,却没有跟上 RSLR 的步伐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Incorporating Measurements of Vertical Land Motion in Wetland Surface Elevation Change Analyses

Incorporating Measurements of Vertical Land Motion in Wetland Surface Elevation Change Analyses

We compared elevation trajectories from 14 rod surface elevation table (RSET) stations and 60 real-time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS) transects within the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge (BNWR) from 2010–2013. The results were similar, 7.3 ± 0.9 (mean ± standard error; RSET) versus 6.2 ± 0.6 mm year−1 (RTK) (P = 0.216), and were greater than relative sea level rise (RSLR) computed at the nearest long-term tide station (3.9 ± 0.29 mm year−1). Despite having shown elevation gain, these wetlands continue to drown and convert to open water. Episodic, multi-day GPS measurements on geodetic control marks at BNWR between 2005 and 2023 revealed a substantial vertical land motion (VLM) signal. From 2005 to 2015, three reference marks used to control the 2010–2013 RTK study lost on average 6.0 ± 0.7 mm year−1, corresponding to 80% and 94% of the elevation gain measured by the RSET and RTK techniques, respectively. The longer 18-year subsidence trend measured on one of these marks was lower, 3.9 ± 0.7 mm year−1, highlighting important interannual variability. Wetland elevation change measurements need to account for VLM occurring below the reference marks used to measure elevation change. Estimates from the nearest long-term tide station may not be applicable to the wetland if the tide station is in a different geological setting. At BNWR, VLM was higher than the VLM at the Cambridge tide station, which helps explain why wetlands at BNWR are not keeping pace with RSLR despite the measured high rates of elevation gain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信