根据阿曼南部(奈杰德、佐法尔)和中南部(杜克姆、乌斯塔)的石质,研究旧石器时代中期努比亚石核的分布情况

IF 1.4 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Metin I. Eren, Michelle R. Bebber, David Singer, Chloe Pearson, Joseph D. Ortiz, Briggs Buchanan, Amir Beshkani, Dominik Chlachula, Rudolf Dellmour, Roman Garba, Anthony E. Marks, Vitaly Usyk, Jeffrey I. Rose
{"title":"根据阿曼南部(奈杰德、佐法尔)和中南部(杜克姆、乌斯塔)的石质,研究旧石器时代中期努比亚石核的分布情况","authors":"Metin I. Eren,&nbsp;Michelle R. Bebber,&nbsp;David Singer,&nbsp;Chloe Pearson,&nbsp;Joseph D. Ortiz,&nbsp;Briggs Buchanan,&nbsp;Amir Beshkani,&nbsp;Dominik Chlachula,&nbsp;Rudolf Dellmour,&nbsp;Roman Garba,&nbsp;Anthony E. Marks,&nbsp;Vitaly Usyk,&nbsp;Jeffrey I. Rose","doi":"10.1002/gea.22019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lithic raw material properties are often invoked to explain the presence, absence, form, or ontogeny of Paleolithic stone tools. Here, we explore whether the frequency of the Middle Paleolithic Nubian core form and core-reduction systems co-varies with toolstone quality in two neighboring regions in Oman: the southern region of Nejd, Dhofar, and the south-central region of Duqm, Al Wusta. Specifically, we predicted that if raw material differences were influencing the distribution of Nubian cores, the chert would be of higher quality in the southern region, where Nubian cores were frequent, and of lower quality in the south-central region, where they were scarce. We tested this prediction by collecting 124 chert samples from 22 outcrops and then quantitatively assessed two geochemical variables that are widely thought to influence knapping: impurity amount and silica content. We also examined the mineralogical composition, and the crystallite size and lattice strain for quartz (crystalline α-SiO<sub>2</sub>) of representative chert samples. Our results suggest that the cherts in the two regions are similar, which is not consistent with the hypothesis that lithic raw material quality contributed to Nubian core spatial distribution in Oman. We discuss potential alternative hypotheses to explain Nubian core geographic patterning, and provisionally suggest that the scarcity of Nubian cores in south-central Oman may be due to a concomitant scarcity of toolmakers, given a lack of water availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":55117,"journal":{"name":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gea.22019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the distribution of Middle Paleolithic Nubian cores relative to chert quality in southern (Nejd, Dhofar) and south-central (Duqm, Al Wusta) Oman\",\"authors\":\"Metin I. Eren,&nbsp;Michelle R. Bebber,&nbsp;David Singer,&nbsp;Chloe Pearson,&nbsp;Joseph D. Ortiz,&nbsp;Briggs Buchanan,&nbsp;Amir Beshkani,&nbsp;Dominik Chlachula,&nbsp;Rudolf Dellmour,&nbsp;Roman Garba,&nbsp;Anthony E. Marks,&nbsp;Vitaly Usyk,&nbsp;Jeffrey I. Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gea.22019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lithic raw material properties are often invoked to explain the presence, absence, form, or ontogeny of Paleolithic stone tools. Here, we explore whether the frequency of the Middle Paleolithic Nubian core form and core-reduction systems co-varies with toolstone quality in two neighboring regions in Oman: the southern region of Nejd, Dhofar, and the south-central region of Duqm, Al Wusta. Specifically, we predicted that if raw material differences were influencing the distribution of Nubian cores, the chert would be of higher quality in the southern region, where Nubian cores were frequent, and of lower quality in the south-central region, where they were scarce. We tested this prediction by collecting 124 chert samples from 22 outcrops and then quantitatively assessed two geochemical variables that are widely thought to influence knapping: impurity amount and silica content. We also examined the mineralogical composition, and the crystallite size and lattice strain for quartz (crystalline α-SiO<sub>2</sub>) of representative chert samples. Our results suggest that the cherts in the two regions are similar, which is not consistent with the hypothesis that lithic raw material quality contributed to Nubian core spatial distribution in Oman. We discuss potential alternative hypotheses to explain Nubian core geographic patterning, and provisionally suggest that the scarcity of Nubian cores in south-central Oman may be due to a concomitant scarcity of toolmakers, given a lack of water availability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gea.22019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gea.22019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoarchaeology-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gea.22019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

石器原材料的特性经常被用来解释旧石器时代石器的存在、缺失、形式或本体。在这里,我们探讨了在阿曼的两个相邻地区:佐法尔省内杰德(Nejd)南部地区和乌斯塔省杜克姆(Duqm)中南部地区,旧石器时代中期努比亚石核形式和石核还原系统的出现频率是否与工具石质量有关。具体来说,我们预测,如果原材料的差异影响了努比亚石核的分布,那么在努比亚石核较多的南部地区,这些石核的质量就会较高,而在努比亚石核较少的中南部地区,这些石核的质量就会较低。我们从 22 个露头采集了 124 块石灰岩样本,对这一预测进行了验证,然后定量评估了两个被普遍认为会影响敲击的地球化学变量:杂质含量和二氧化硅含量。我们还研究了代表性白垩岩样本的矿物成分、石英(结晶α-SiO2)的晶粒大小和晶格应变。我们的研究结果表明,这两个地区的白垩岩是相似的,这与石材原料质量导致努比亚岩芯在阿曼的空间分布的假说不一致。我们讨论了解释努比亚石核地理格局的潜在替代假说,并初步认为阿曼中南部努比亚石核稀少的原因可能是由于缺水而导致工具制造者稀少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Examining the distribution of Middle Paleolithic Nubian cores relative to chert quality in southern (Nejd, Dhofar) and south-central (Duqm, Al Wusta) Oman

Examining the distribution of Middle Paleolithic Nubian cores relative to chert quality in southern (Nejd, Dhofar) and south-central (Duqm, Al Wusta) Oman

Lithic raw material properties are often invoked to explain the presence, absence, form, or ontogeny of Paleolithic stone tools. Here, we explore whether the frequency of the Middle Paleolithic Nubian core form and core-reduction systems co-varies with toolstone quality in two neighboring regions in Oman: the southern region of Nejd, Dhofar, and the south-central region of Duqm, Al Wusta. Specifically, we predicted that if raw material differences were influencing the distribution of Nubian cores, the chert would be of higher quality in the southern region, where Nubian cores were frequent, and of lower quality in the south-central region, where they were scarce. We tested this prediction by collecting 124 chert samples from 22 outcrops and then quantitatively assessed two geochemical variables that are widely thought to influence knapping: impurity amount and silica content. We also examined the mineralogical composition, and the crystallite size and lattice strain for quartz (crystalline α-SiO2) of representative chert samples. Our results suggest that the cherts in the two regions are similar, which is not consistent with the hypothesis that lithic raw material quality contributed to Nubian core spatial distribution in Oman. We discuss potential alternative hypotheses to explain Nubian core geographic patterning, and provisionally suggest that the scarcity of Nubian cores in south-central Oman may be due to a concomitant scarcity of toolmakers, given a lack of water availability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal
Geoarchaeology-An International Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoarchaeology is an interdisciplinary journal published six times per year (in January, March, May, July, September and November). It presents the results of original research at the methodological and theoretical interface between archaeology and the geosciences and includes within its scope: interdisciplinary work focusing on understanding archaeological sites, their environmental context, and particularly site formation processes and how the analysis of sedimentary records can enhance our understanding of human activity in Quaternary environments. Manuscripts should examine the interrelationship between archaeology and the various disciplines within Quaternary science and the Earth Sciences more generally, including, for example: geology, geography, geomorphology, pedology, climatology, oceanography, geochemistry, geochronology, and geophysics. We also welcome papers that deal with the biological record of past human activity through the analysis of faunal and botanical remains and palaeoecological reconstructions that shed light on past human-environment interactions. The journal also welcomes manuscripts concerning the examination and geological context of human fossil remains as well as papers that employ analytical techniques to advance understanding of the composition and origin or material culture such as, for example, ceramics, metals, lithics, building stones, plasters, and cements. Such composition and provenance studies should be strongly grounded in their geological context through, for example, the systematic analysis of potential source materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信